TiLTNews Network: Earth Watch

Friday, July 17, 2015

FDA Legalizes Drug That Removes Free Will and Wipes Memories

Published on Jul 17, 2015

A hazardous drug that eliminates free will and can wipe the memory of its victims is currently being dealt on the streets of Colombia.
The drug is called scopolamine, but is colloquially known as ‘The Devil’s Breath,' and is derived from a particular type of tree common to South America.
Stories surrounding the drug are the stuff of urban legends, with some telling horror stories of how people were raped, forced to empty their bank accounts, and even coerced into giving up an organ.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...

Category
- News & Politics
License
- Standard YouTube License

Alex Jones Debunks Jade Helm Critics

The marching orders have been given to demonize Alex Jones for daring to expose Jade Helm. Jones reveals the decades-old plan for martial law using pentagon documents and establishment media reports to show that Jade Helm is part of the PsyOp to acclimate the American people to troops on the street and merge federal agencies with local law enforcement.
The media would rather distract you with Caitlin Jenner and her possible penis so you don't question if Jade Helm is more than just a routine exercise. Once again, media lies are exposed but they just hope you're too stupid to care.
Learn more about Jade Helm 15: http://www.infowars.com/jade-helm-dec...
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show
Follow Alex on TWITTER - https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
Like Alex on FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme...
Infowars on G+ - https://plus.google.com/+infowars/
:Web:
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.net/

OBAMA HONORS ISLAM BEFORE DEAD MARINES KILLED BY ISLAMIC TERRORIST; AMERICANS FURIOUS

White House sent out 'happy Ramadan' statement before commenting on Chattanooga attack

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | JULY 17, 2015

President Obama issued a statement yesterday urging Americans to respect the religion of Islam before he even commented on a terror attack by an Islamic extremist in Chattanooga which killed four Marines, prompting widespread anger.

The White House tweeted out a statement wishing Muslims “Eid Mubarak!” as Ramadan came to a close, adding that, “the holiday is a reminder to every American of the importance of respecting those of all faiths and beliefs.”

View image on Twitter

Follow

The White House
✔@WhiteHouse

"From my family to yours, Eid Mubarak!" —@POTUS to Muslims celebrating Eid-ul-Fitr: http://go.wh.gov/M6gdrS

4:48 PM - 16 Jul 2015

The statement was tweeted hours after the Chattanooga shooting and after it had been established that the culprit was 24-year-old Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez, a Kuwaiti Muslim whose blog revealed that Islam played a central role in his ideology.

It was only after Obama had lectured Americans about respecting Islam that he paid tribute to the four dead Marines killed by an Islamic terrorist.

Reaction to the timing was brutal.

LEFT MEDIA THAT BLAMED WHITES FOR CHARLESTON PETRIFIED OF TALKING ISLAMIC EXTREMISM AFTER CHATTANOOGA

Political correctness is king following attack on Marines

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | JULY 17, 2015

While the leftist media almost immediately suggested that all white people were collectively responsible for the Charleston massacre, even after the Chattanooga killer was named as Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, one CNN analyst asserted that he might even not be a Muslim.

Of course it was quickly revealed that Abdulazeez was a Muslim (the clue being the name Muhammad), but this one exchange illustrates yet again how progressives are obsessed with political correctness in their refusal to acknowledge the threat posed by radical Islam – or that violent Muslims are motivated by Islam at all.

Asked by John Berman what the name ‘Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez’ suggested about the nature of the attack, CNN analyst and former FBI assistant director Tom Fuentes was frightened to even acknowledge the likelihood that the shooter was an Islamic extremist.

“I know…what the name sounds like, but we don’t know that it’s a Muslim name. We know it’s an Arabic name. We don’t know what this individual was believing in, and that’s what they’re going to be trying to determine,” said Fuentes.

You could almost feel Fuentes quaking in his boots at the very thought of having to acknowledge that Islam may have played a role in the attack.

MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell also tried to divert attention from Abdulazeez’s own blog which revealed that Islam played a central role in his ideology, instead choosing to ask his bewildered former classmate whether or not the shooter liked to go hunting.

The revulsion that was (rightly) directed towards Dylann Roof was also mysteriously absent. CNN anchor Carol Costello called Abdulazeez “good looking” and “popular at high school.”

Meanwhile, Salon.com, which said that “White America must answer for the Charleston church massacre,” is not calling for all Muslims or Arabs to answer for the Chattanooga shooting. In fact, the story is barely even being covered by the leftist media outlet at all.

Political correctness is king following attack on Marines.

Nationwide mandatory vaccination bill is now here! New law will punish states that uphold medical choice

Friday, July 17, 2015 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

Tags: mandatory vaccines, vaccine exemptions, medical choice

(NaturalNews) Medical tyranny is apparently quite trendy in America these days, as a Florida congresswoman recently introduced a new legislative bill that, if passed, would restrict federal funding to states that don't require every single public school studentto be fully vaccinated according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended guidelines.
Representative Frederica S. Wilson, a Democrat from Florida's 24th District (which includes parts of Miami), has unveiled the aptly-titled "Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015," which sets as a requirement that "each student enrolled in one of the State's public elementary schools or public secondary schools ... be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices."
If a state doesn't abide by this draconian requirement, including every state that has vaccine exemption laws currently on the books, then it will no longer be eligible to receive federal grants, according to the provisions of the bill. In other words, live by Big Brother's rules or be cut off from the gravy train (wait, isn't this the type of despotism our forefathers fought to escape by settling in the new world?).
"This bill is essentially an attempt to blackmail states into abandoning any vaccination exemptions they currently have in place," writes Lily Dane for The Daily Sheeple about the proposed measure.

Forced vaccinations bill would require all Americans born into it get at least 184 jabs!

If you haven't taken a gander at the CDC's Recommended Childhood Vaccine Schedule in a while, you might be surprised to learn that quite a few new vaccines have been added to the list over the past several decades - and many more are on the way!
Compared to the schedule from 1983, which contained only 24 vaccine doses within the first year-and-a-half of a child's life, today's schedule contains an astounding 71 vaccine doses during this same time period. And this number balloons even further as a child grows older, swelling to a shocking 184 vaccine doses over a person's entire lifetime!
"Put simply, all philosophical and religious objections would have to be abolished by the States, in submission to the power of the Federal Purse," reads an announcement published in Dr. Rima Truth Reports. "All medical excuses would be subject to the state's very strict regulations that violate the patient/doctor relationship and unreasonably restrict the practice of medicine."

Parents, adults would also be subjected for forced jabs under Rep. Wilson's proposed bill

Children wouldn't be the only victims within this new mandatory jab paradigm. The CDC, it turns out, has already initiated a plan through Obama's Affordable Care Act to work with employers to push the CDC's vaccine schedule on adults. The so-called "National Adult Immunization Plan" currently being drafted would add an additional 114 vaccine doses to what an individual would receive throughout his lifetime.
"There are currently 271 vaccines in the development pipeline," explains The Daily Sheeple.
So what happens when people refuse Rep. Wilson's hypothetical plan to forcibly jab every American child and adult with live viruses, aluminum, mercury, and other deadly neurotoxins? In blatant violation of the Nuremberg Code, Wilson has suggested using "element[s] of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion." Put simply, you'll take the government's vaccines or you'll die, essentially.
"Our warning to all Federal and State legislators: Do not become accessories to the violation of International Humanitarian Law," warns Dr. Rima Laibow about this dangerous, treasonous bill that wages war on medical freedom in the U.S.
Sources:
http://wilson.house.gov
http://www.thedailysheeple.com
http://drrimatruthreports.com
http://www.truthwiki.org/Vaccine_Fanaticism/
http://www.truthwiki.org/Medical_Fascism/

Explore more on Mandatory vaccines by searching on GoodGopher.com, the search engine for truth seekers.

Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/050430_mandatory_vaccines_vaccine_exemptions_medical_choice.html#ixzz3gBUM9AE5

HOUSE COMMITTEE PASSED LEGISLATION TO CREATE SPECIAL DOMESTIC TERROR UNIT THE DAY BEFORE CHATTANOOGA SHOOTING

Act ignores role of FBI in creating terror attack plots

by KURT NIMMO | INFOWARS.COM | JULY 17, 2015

On Wednesday, prior to the shooting in Chattanooga blamed on a Muslim, the House Homeland

Security Committee voted in favor the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Act of 2015 (H.R. 2899).

The legislation will create an office within the Department of Homeland Security to address homegrown terrorism and will be allocated $10 million annually.

Pilot CVE programs have already been launched in Boston, Los Angeles and Minneapolis.

Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican and Homeland Security Committee chairman, sponsored the bill. According to The Washington Times, McCaul said something needs to be done to protect the United States from the growing number of Islamic State inspired-attacks against military facilities, law enforcement officers and Americans.

Congress claims the number of people facing prosecution for planning terror attacks in the United States has increased from 13 in 2014 to 61 in 2015.

Left unmentioned is the fact virtually all high profile domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 9/11 have included the “direct involvement” of government agents or informants, according to a report released last July by Human Rights Watch.

“The problem with the cases we’re talking about is that defendants would not have done anything if not kicked in the ass by government agents,” Martin Stolar, a lawyer for an accused terror suspect, told Mother Jones. “They’re creating crimes to solve crimes so they can claim a victory in the war on terror.”

Forty-two organizations have raised concerns over CVE.

“Given the lack of a sound research basis for CVE programming, establishing a high-level DHS office devoted to the matter would be a further waste of security resources,” states a letter sent to McCaul and Rep. Bennie G. Thompson on July 10 by a number of civil rights groups.

The letter also indirectly addresses the work of the FBI in conjuring up terror plots.

“We note that the bill would require the CVE office to ensure that all CVE-related activities ‘fully respect the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties of all Americans.’ Unfortunately, given the history of and ongoing abuses in federal counterterrorism policy, including the use of community outreach to gather intelligence and the pressuring of American-Muslims to become informants against their own communities, these words have little meaning.”

FACEBOOK CENSORS POST REVEALING SECRET BILL TO BAN GMO LABELING

Social media giant suppresses spread of information on damning legislation

by ADAN SALAZAR & ANTHONY GUCCIARDI | INFOWARS.COM | JULY 17, 2015

11400

Facebook is actively censoring shares of an article regarding a federal bill aiming to ban GMO food labeling.

Multiple users of the social media platform are finding themselves unable to share an article entitled, “This New Bill Could Ban GMO Labeling For Good,” which discusses H.R. 1599 – a bill known as the “Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015.”

Instead of allowing immediate shares, Facebook prompts users with an error that reads, “This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems,” according to a screen capture provided by author Anthony Gucciardi.

Other users are required to answer “security check” questions in order to share the article after a message prompt reads, “It looks like a link that you’re sharing might be unsafe.”

The official March Against Monsanto Facebook page is also filled with comments from people who say they were initially prevented from sharing the story.

Infowars.com mirrored the article, and was also prevented from sharing it on their Facebook page.

The apparently-controversial report, posted yesterday to NaturalSociety.com and published onInfowars.com as a featured story, breaks down how the bill, sponsored by Monsanto supporter Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS), “could soon ban all mandatory GMO labeling in the US.”

“More precisely, it has been dubbed to be the‘Monsanto Protection Act’ on steroids,‘”Gucciardi states in the article, describing how the bill “was drafted up by the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), and pushed on us by all the usual suspects. All the ones who are afraid of you actually knowing what’s in your food.”

According to Gucciardi, Facebook’s efforts to prevent the spread of information represents a sinister suppression of ideas, and only serves to magnify the importance of the article.

“We’ve seen thousands of reports regarding the censorship of content by Facebook and others regarding the TPP, Monsanto, and similar topics,” says Gucciardi.

“The bottom line here is that this article is being blocked across numerous platforms under the guise of a ‘security’ threat, when we know full well that these sites are perfectly safe.

“This content blocking only further acts to highlight the powerful message behind the secretive bill being put forth by congress to ban GMO labeling and dismantle the opposition against Monsanto.”

http://www.infowars.com/facebook-censors-post-revealing-secret-bill-to-ban-gmo-labeling/

4 Simple Questions

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

THOSE WHO BECOME TIRESOME OF SEEKING THE TRUTH...AND SUBMIT AND KNEEL TO A LIE...WILL EVENTUALLY SUBMIT AND KNEEL TO ANYTHING. WOE BE UNTO THEM.

Here are 4 Simple questions from a reputable attorney .......... Are there ANY logical answers ???? You be the judge...... Here's what I would like to know. If the TRUTH ever comes out, and it is decided that Obama was never eligible to be president, what happens to all the laws he signed into being and all the executive orders? Should they all be null and void? Here are 4 Simple questions from a reputable attorney............... This really should get your "gray matter" to churning, even if you are an Obama fan. I wouldn't want YOUR hero to be made out to be a liar, would you? For all you "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from Fox. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein). It is very easy for someone to check out. 4 Simple Questions
.....

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes'. So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 and lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". (check it below)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_%28http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya%29

3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", Respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978 ? (CHECK IT BELOW)
http://http/http/www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx ( http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx ) Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media ?

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes? Very truly yours, RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB Attorney at Law 354 Eisenhower Parkway Livingston, NJ 07039 "A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens."

Thursday, July 16, 2015

Vaccine Associated Narcolepsy Genetically Changing the Brain Forever!

By Experimental Vaccines
More information continues to emerge about the link between the Pandemrix H1N1 flu vaccine and the incurable sleeping disorder, narcolepsy. Kenny Valenzuela explains the importance of how vaccines can cross the blood-brain barrier.

Research links posted below:

Pandemrix Flu Vaccine Linked To Narcolepsy
Vaccine Induced Narcolepsy Court Awards Millions
Vaccine Exemption Forms
Vaccine Inserts and Ingredients

NBCNEWS Study Could Explain Flu Vaccine Link to Narcolepsy
Study offers clue to link between swine flu vaccine, narcolepsy Fox News
Antibodies to influenza nucleoprotein cross-react with human hypocretin receptor 2
Clinical Trails 26 Studies on Pandemrix Flu Vaccine
Italy Bans Flu Shot 9 Dead
You can find more of Kenny Valenzuela's informative videos at his site ExperimentalVaccines.org

Vaccine Associated Narcolepsy Genetically Changing the Brain Forever!
Activist
Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:24:00 GMT

Old pic of Confederate flag a safety threat?

The chief of a publicly funded university has backtracked quickly on his claim that the image of a Confederate flag in a three-year-old photograph was “offensive” and “possibly even threatening.”
That claim was made by University of Missouri-Columbia Chancellor R. Bowen Loftin in a statement that was posted online.
At the Reason.com blog, Robby Soave wrote about it and quoted from it.
He reported that a Twitter account was collecting images of fraternities around the country, and one of them showed several people holding the Confederate flag in front of Columbia’s Phi Kappa Theta house.
The Maneater blog reported that the photograph “was likely taken in the days surrounding a September 8, 2012, football game between the University of Georgia and MU. Three of the five men in the photo are wearing Bulldogs apparel and a University of Georgia flag flies alongside the Confederate Navy Jack.”
Loftin immediately jumped at the challenge, announcing an investigation to identify those in the picture.
“Especially considering recent events in South Carolina concerning the Confederate flag, this photo may be considered offensive and possibly even threatening to some of our community members,” his statement said.
“MU officials do not condone any activities that could threaten the safety of our community.”
See the wide range of flags in the WND Superstore collection, including the Gadsden, the Union Civil War, the Continental Colors, the Bennington and more.
However, by Thursday, his statement had vanished from the school website.
In its place was one that backtracked rapidly.
“Yesterday, I received several messages via social media from concerned students and friends of MU about a photo taken at a Greek fraternity house near campus where individuals were posing with a Confederate flag,” he wrote. “After reviewing the photo and the context in which it was taken, we determined that it was taken three years ago and no MU students were in the photo.
“Based on this information, we will not be taking any additional actions.”
The Reason commentary noted, “Saying a photograph of the Confederate flag is offensive is one thing. Labeling it a threat is quite another. No one’s safety is impugned by the old photo, and it’s ludicrous to think otherwise.”
Lawmakers in South Carolina recently voted to remove a Confederate flag that had been flying outside their statehouse in Columbia because of June 17 mass shooting in Charleston.
The suspect there, Dylann Roof, is accused of murdering nine members of a Bible study group at a church.
During the investigation, photographs of Roof with a Confederate flag surfaced, sparking outrage at the emblem some people feel represents an era of hate, while others feel it represents a southern heritage.
The nation reacted to extremes, with networks taking old “Dukes of Hazzard” reruns off the air because the car, the General Lee, had a Confederate flag painted on its top. Major retailers all over suspended sales of Confederate-themed products, too.

Old pic of Confederate flag a safety threat?
Bob Unruh
Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:49:06 GMT

Subscribe to: Comments ( Atom )