Hoax article received an astonishing 21,000 Facebook shares

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | JULY 7, 2015

---

Local officials were forced to deny a fake news story that claimed two black teens were murdered by white supremacists at a July 4th festival in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina after the post went viral on Facebook.

The article, posted by the ‘NewsWatch 33‘ website, reported that three black teens were brutally attacked by a group of “white guys” after they protested against the Confederate flag. The black teens were subjected to racial slurs before being attacked with bats, the site claimed. Two of the victims were pronounced dead at the scene while another was in critical condition. Police subsequently labeled the massacre a “hate crime”.

However, the incident never occurred. As ABC 15 reports, “There was no hate crime attack in Myrtle Beach over the July 4th holiday weekend.”

“There’s no reason for that (story) to exist, it’s false, it’s made up. I can’t explain that,” said city spokesman Mark Kruea. After receiving numerous calls about the story, Myrtle Beach police also sent out a post on Facebook and Twitter asserting that the incident did not happen.

Kruea pleaded with other media outlets to report the hoax and “expose this darkness from wherever it came.”

The fake story was shared an incredible 21,000 times on Facebook despite being completely bogus.

Numerous respondents to the article were also fooled by the post, apparently oblivious to the content of the rest of the website, which includes stories entitled ‘Obama Expected To Sign Executive Order Entitling African-Americans To Reparations’ and ‘Woman Stabbed Husband Over Him Ignoring Candy Crush Life Requests’.

“I’m at a loss for words. America is heading towards an all out racial war,” remarked Steve Spencer.

“I am praying for the families of these courageous teens,” said Shirley Venton.

The incident highlights the danger of fake news websites which post incredibly irresponsible content, misleading thousands of people in the process.

Earlier this year, Facebook announced that it was cracking down on fake news websites by filtering out bogus stories, but on this evidence, the problem seems to be only getting worse.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

http://www.infowars.com/officials-forced-to-deny-fake-news-story-about-white-supremacist-murder-of-black-teens/

WOMAN WHO DIED OF MEASLES WAS VACCINATED

Public health authorities predictably spin incident to push for more inoculations

by ADAN SALAZAR | INFOWARS.COM | JULY 7, 2015

---

Last week, the corporate media scrambled to spin the story of the first US measles patient who died in 12 years, despite her being vaccinated against the very disease which killed her.

The Associated Press reported the Washington State woman, whose name and age was not released, was believed to have contracted the disease while at the hospital in poor health.

“Officials didn’t say whether the woman was vaccinated, but they did note she had a compromised immune system,” the AP reported at the time. “They withheld her age to protect her identity but said she was not elderly.”

In a follow up article the next day, it emerged the woman had in fact been vaccinated against measles, “but because she had other health problems and was taking medications that interfered with her response to an infection ‘she was not protected,’” a doctor told the AP.

The death is reported to be the first case attributed to measles since 2003.

Despite the vaccine doing nothing to help the poor woman who died, public health authorities predictably exploited the incident to push for more inoculations.

“This tragic situation illustrates the importance of immunizing as many people as possible to provide a high level of community protection against measles,” Washington State Department of Health spokesman Donn Moyer said. “’People with compromised immune systems cannot be vaccinated against measles. Even when vaccinated, they may not have a good immune response when exposed to disease; they may be especially vulnerable to disease outbreaks.”

So basically, vaccines may or may not work if you get sick.

Establishment health officials also invariably neglect to mention the chemical soup in vaccines can produce serious adverse reactions, which can be so severe as to include death.

“…[A]s of December 14, 2014 there have been 6,962 serious adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with measles vaccine since 1990, with over half of those occurring in children three years old and under,” reports the National Vaccine Information Center. “Of these events 329 were deaths, with over half of the deaths occurring in children under three years of age.”

Moreover, the sheer controversy regarding the M-M-R (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine should give the public cause for concern.

The toxicity of various heavy metals in M-M-R and other vaccines has been blamed by foremost health experts for the recent sharp increase in childhood autism rates.

Aside from that, a host of research studies show a causal effect between vaccines and autism, proving the shots may be more detrimental than beneficial to public health.

http://www.infowars.com/american-woman-who-died-of-measles-was-vaccinated/

GAY MARRIAGE: STATE AGENCY ORDERS CHRISTIANS TO STOP TALKING ABOUT THEIR FAITH

Christians denied First Amendment rights for refusing to cater a gay wedding

Tom / Flickr
by KIT DANIELS | INFOWARS.COM | JULY 7, 2015

---

After a Christian couple said they refused to bake a gay wedding cake because they have “faith in the Lord,” an Oregon state agency ordered them to “cease and desist” talking about their faith.

The couple, Aaron and Melissa Klein, were also ordered to pay $135,000 to the lesbian couple they refused to serve as compensation for “emotional damages.”
Claiming the Kleins violated Oregon’s anti-discriminatory laws, Oregon’s Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) Commissioner Brad Avakian ordered them to “cease and desist” discussing their Christian beliefsbecause they made the following statements on the Christian Broadcasting Network:

1. Aaron Klein: “I didn’t want to be a part of her marriage, which I think is wrong.”
2. Melissa Klein: “I am who I am and I want to live my life the way I want to live my life and, you know, I choose to serve God.”
3. Aaron Klein: “It’s one of those things where you never want to see something you’ve put so much work into go belly up, but on the other hand, I have faith in the Lord and he’s taken care of us up to this point and I’m sure he will in the future.”

“Avakian took these general statements of the Kleins talking about their religious beliefs, the attack launched on them by Avakian’s agency, and their determination to not give in to government persecution, to ‘constitute notice that discrimination will be made in the future by refusing such services,'” The Daily Signalreported.
The commissioner even singled out a handwritten sign the Kleins posted on their bakery’s front door which stated:

Closed but still in business. You can reach me by … this fight is not over. We will continue to stand strong. Your religious freedom is becoming not free anymore. This is ridiculous that we cannot practice our faith. The LORD is good and we will continue to serve HIM with all our heart.

“Aaron Klein did not only say that he would not do [the lesbian couple’s] specific marriage and cake but that [they] ‘don’t do’ same-sex marriages and cakes,” Avakian wrote. “[The Kleins] joint statement that they will ‘continue’ to stand strong relates to their denial of service and is prospective in nature.”
“The statements, therefore, indicate their clear intent to discriminate in the future just as they had done with [the lesbian couple].”
In other words, if you decline to cater a gay wedding, you must surrender your First Amendment rights entirely, according to BOLI.
http://www.infowars.com/gay-marriage-state-agency-orders-christians-to-stop-talking-about-their-faith/

Ron Paul: Western Agitation Boosts Sectarianism in the Middle East

JUDICIAL WATCH: NEW DOCUMENTS REVEAL DOJ, IRS, AND FBI PLAN TO SEEK CRIMINAL CHARGES OF OBAMA OPPONENTS

Lois Lerner and IRS concoct reason to put Obama’s opponents in jail before reelection

by JUDICIAL WATCH | JULY 7, 2015

---

Judicial Watch today released new Department of Justice (DOJ) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) documents that include an official “DOJ Recap” report detailing an October 2010 meeting between Lois Lerner, DOJ officials and the FBI to plan for the possible criminal prosecution of targeted nonprofit organizations for alleged illegal political activity.
The newly obtained records also reveal that the Obama DOJ wanted IRS employees who were going to testify to Congress to turn over documents to the DOJ before giving them to Congress. Records also detail how the Obama IRS gave the FBI 21 computer disks, containing 1.25 million pages of confidential IRS returns from 113,000 nonprofit social 501(c)(4) welfare groups  – or nearly every 501(c)(4) in the United States – as part of its prosecution effort. According to a letter from then-House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, “This revelation likely means that the IRS – including possibly Lois Lerner – violated federal tax law by transmitting this information to the Justice Department.”
The documents were produced subsequent to court orders in two Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits: Judicial Watch v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:14-cv-1956) and Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 1:14-cv-1239).
The new IRS documents include a October 11, 2010 “DOJ Recap” memo sent by IRS Exempt Organizations Tax Law Specialist Siri Buller to Lerner and other top IRS officials explaining an October 8 meeting with representatives from the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section and “one representative from the FBI” to discuss the possible criminal prosecution of nonprofit organizations for alleged political activity:

On October 8, 2010, Lois Lerner, Joe Urban [IRS Technical Advisor, TEGE], Judy Kindell [top aide to Lerner], Justin Lowe [Technical Advisor to the Commissioner of Tax-Exempt and Government Entities], and Siri Buller met with the section chief and other attorneys from the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section, and one representative from the FBI, to discuss recent attention to the political activity of exempt organizations.
The section’s attorneys expressed concern that certain section 501(c) organizations are actually political committees “posing” as if they are not subject to FEC law, and therefore may be subject to criminal liability. The attorneys mentioned several possible theories to bring criminal charges under FEC law. In response, Lois and Judy eloquently explained the following points:

• Under section 7805(b), we may only revoke or modify an organization’s exemption retroactively if it omitted or misstated a material fact or operated in a manner materially different from that originally represented.

• If we do not have these misrepresentations, the organization may rely on our determination it is exempt. However, the likelihood of revocation is diminished by the fact that section 501(c)(4)-(c)(6) organizations are not required to apply for recognition of exemption.

• We discussed the hypothetical situation of a section 501(c)(4) organization that declares itself exempt as a social welfare organization, but at the end of the taxable year has in fact functioned as a political organization. Judy explained that such an organization, in order to be in compliance, would simply file Form 1120-POL and paying tax at the highest corporate rate.

Lois stated that although we do not believe that organizations which are subject to a civil audit subsequently receive any type of immunity from a criminal investigation, she will refer them to individuals from CI who can better answer that question. She explained that we are legally required to separate the civil and criminal aspects of any examination and that while we do not have EO law experts in CI, our FIU agents are experienced in coordinating with CI.
The attorneys asked whether a change in the law is necessary, and whether a three-way partnership among DOJ, the FEC, and the IRS is possible to prevent prohibited activity by these organizations. Lois listed a number of obstacles to the attorneys’ theories:
[REDACTED]
She pointed to Revenue Ruling 2004-6, which was drafted in light of the electioneering communication rules before they were litigated.

Just prior this meeting, the IRS began the process of providing the FBI confidential taxpayer information on nonprofit groups. An IRS document confirms the IRS supplied the FBI with 21 disks containing 1.25 million pages of taxpayer records:

FROM: Hamilton David K
SENT: Tuesday, October 5, 2010  2:49 PM
TO: Whittaker Sherry [Director, GE Program Management], Blackwell Robert M
SUBJECT: RE: Question
There are 113,000 C4 returns from January 1, 2007 to now. Assuming they want all pages including redacted ones, that’s 1.25 million pages … If we get started on it right away, before the 10^th when the monthly extracts start, we can probably get it done in a week or so….

The DOJ documents also include a July 16, 2013, email from an undisclosed Justice Department official to a lawyer for IRS employees asking that the Obama administration get information from congressional witnesses before Congress does:

One last issue. If any of your clients have documents they are providing to Congress that you can (or would like to) provide to us before their testimony, we would be pleased to receive them. We are 6103 authorized and I can connect you with TIGTA to confirm; we would like the unredacted documents.

“These new documents show that the Obama IRS scandal is also an Obama DOJ and FBI scandal,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The FBI and Justice Department worked with Lois Lerner and the IRS to concoct some reason to put President Obama’s opponents in jail before his reelection. And this abuse resulted in the FBI’s illegally obtaining confidential taxpayer information. How can the Justice Department and FBI investigate the very scandal in which they are implicated?”
On April 16, 2014, Judicial Watch forced the IRS to release documents revealing for the first time that Lerner communicated with the DOJ in May 2013 about whether it was possible to launch criminal prosecutions against targeted tax-exempt entities. The documents were obtained due to court order in an October 2013 Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the IRS.
Those documents contained an email exchange between Lerner and Nikole C. Flax, then-chief of staff to then-Acting IRS Commissioner Steven T. Miller discussing plans to work with the DOJ to prosecute nonprofit groups that “lied” (Lerner’s quotation marks) about political activities. The exchange included aMay 8, 2013, email by Lerner:

I got a call today from Richard Pilger Director Elections Crimes Branch at DOJ … He wanted to know who at IRS the DOJ folk s [sic] could talk to about Sen. Whitehouse idea at the hearing that DOJ could piece together false statement cases about applicants who “lied” on their 1024s –saying they weren’t planning on doing political activity, and then turning around and making large visible political expenditures. DOJ is feeling like it needs to respond, but want to talk to the right folks at IRS to see whether there are impediments from our side and what, if any damage this might do to IRS programs. I told him that sounded like we might need several folks from IRS…

Democratic Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse held a hearing on April 9, 2013, during which, “in questioning the witnesses from the DOJ and IRS, Whitehouse asked why they have not prosecuted 501(c)(4) groups that have seemingly made false statements about their political activities…”
The House Oversight Committee followed up on these Judicial Watch disclosures with hearings and interviews of Pilger and his boss, DOJ Public Integrity Chief Jack Smith. Besides confirming the DOJ’s 2013 communications with Lerner, Pilger admitted to the committee that DOJ officials met with Lerner in October 2010. Judicial Watch obtained new documents about these meetings in December 2014 showing the Obama DOJ initiated outreach to the IRS about prosecuting tax-exempt entities.
Following Judicial Watch’s lead, the House also found out about the IRS transmittal of the confidential taxpayer information to the FBI. Because of this public disclosure, the FBI was forced to return the 1.25 million pages to the IRS.
http://www.infowars.com/judicial-watch-new-documents-reveal-doj-irs-and-fbi-plan-to-seek-criminal-charges-of-obama-opponents/

‘WE’RE TRAINING ISIL': WHITE HOUSE WEBSITE CORRECTS OBAMA’S SPEECH BLOOPER

President's embarrassing error during press briefing amended on official transcript

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | JULY 7, 2015

---

The White House.gov website has corrected an embarrassing mistake made by Barack Obama during his press briefing yesterday about the Islamic State when the President said that U.S. forces were “training ISIL.”



During his speech, Obama uttered the line, “with the additional steps I ordered last month, we’re speeding up training of ISIL forces.”
The White House.gov transcript left in the original quote, but placed the word ‘Iraqi’ in brackets after the word ISIL, correcting Obama’s mistake.

This is by no means the first time that the White House has edited transcripts of Obama’s speeches to put the president in a better light or cover up for his mistakes.
Last October, the White House completely scrubbed a reference Obama made to unpaid pills being stacked up at his home in Chicago, replacing it with the quote, “there’s still junk on my desk, including some — newspapers and all kinds of stuff.”
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest later dubiously claimed that the line about Obama’s bills was left out because the recording equipment malfunctioned.
The White House again edited Obama’s remarks in March when he mistakenly stated, “the bond between the United States and America is unbreakable.”
When the Bush administration caught flak for amending transcripts, they immediately switched to providing the president’s remarks verbatim, which was not an easy decision considering George W. Bush’s notorious “Bushisms”.
However, the Obama White House seems happy to continue amending history instead of providing an accurate record of what the president actually said.
Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet
*********************

Newseum: Only 19% Know 1st Amendment Guarantees Freedom of Religion

By Terence P. Jeffrey | July 6, 2015 | 10:37 AM EDT

The Newseum in Washington, D.C., features the words of the First Amendment on its facade. (AP Photo)

(CNSNews.com) - Only 19 percent of American adults know that the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights guarantees the freedom of religion, according to a new survey by the Newseum Institute.

Only 10 percent know the First Amendment guarantees the freedom of the press.

And 33 percent of Americans have no idea at all what rights the First Amendment guarantees.

The First Amendment says: “Congress shall make no law resepecting an establishment of religion, or abridging the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

The Newseum Institute survey conducted by Dr. Ken Dautrich, president of the Stats Group, interviewed 1,002 American adults from May 14 through 23. The survey had a margin of error of +/- 3.2 percentage points.

The respondents were asked: “As you may know, the First Amendment is part of the U.S. Constitution. Can you name any of the specific rights that are guaranteed by the First Amendment?”

Fifty-seven percent were able to say that the First Amendment guarantees the freedom of speech. But only 19 percent were able to say that it guarantees freedom of religion. Only 10 percent were able to say it guarantees freedom of the press. Only 10 percent were able to say it guarantees the right of assembly, and only 2 percent were able to say it guarantees the right to petition.

Thirty-three percent of the Americans surveyed were unable to cite a single right that was guaranteed by the First Amendment.

In the second question in the Newseum poll, the surveyors read respondents the actual words of the First Amendment.

They then asked this question: “Based on your feelings about the First Amendment, please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following statement: The First Amendment goes too far in the rights in guarantees.”

19 percent agreed that the First Amendment goes too far, and 75 percent of the respondents disagreed.

The Newseum Institute has asked this question in 17 annual surveys starting in 1999.  The percentage who disagreed with the assertion that the First Amendment “goes too far” peaked at 81 percent in 2012. It has declined since then.

The highest percentage of Americans agreed that the First Amendment goes too far in 2002. That year, 49 percent agreed that it goes too far and 47 percent disagreed.

In 18 annual surveys dating back to 1997, the highest percentage who were ever able to say that the First Amendment protects freedom of religion was 29 percent in 2014.

Last year also saw the highest percentage who were able to say that the First Amendment guaranteed freedom of speech. But that high point was only 68 percent.

In the 18 years of surveys, awareness that the First Amendment guarantees freedom of the press peaked in 2010—at 18 percent.

In the Newseum Institutes’s 2008 survey complete ignorance of the First Amendment had its peak. In that year, 40 percent of those surveyed could not name a single right guaranteed by the First Amendment.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/newseum-only-19-know-1st-amendment-guarantees-freedom-religion

US PREPARING COUP TO PREVENT GREECE FROM FALLING UNDER RUSSIAN INFLUENCE

Coup master Victoria Nuland dispatched

Image Credits: Voice of America.
by KURT NIMMO | INFOWARS.COM | JULY 6, 2015

---

The United States and Germany are prepared to engineer a coup in Greece to keep the country operating as a strategic asset on NATO’s vulnerable southeast European flank.

“A putsch in Athens to save allied Greece from enemy Russia is in preparation by the US and Germany, with backing from the non-taxpayers of Greece – the Greek oligarchs, Anglo-Greek shipowners, and the Greek Church,” writes John Helmer, the longest continuously serving foreign correspondent in Russia not connected to the corporate media.
The primary tip-off something is brewing can be detected by the presence of Victoria Nuland, assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, in Athens in March.
Nuland, The Guardian reported on March 17, “flew into the capital amid mounting US concerns that the great euro debt crisis has begun to pose a geopolitical threat. Allowed to veer out of control, Greece could end up in the ambit of Russia, financially bereft and without the EU links that keep it bounded to the west. Nato’s south-eastern flank would be immeasurably weakened at a time of mounting global security worries over Islamic fundamentalists in the Middle East.”
Nuland and the United States may be working closely with Greek military to foment a coup following the historic “No” vote in a referendum of the demands of the banksters.
She is notorious for her role in the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine and it now appears she has been assigned for a repeat in Greece. Helmer writes that when Nuland

visited Athens to issue an ultimatum against breaking the anti-Russian sanctions regime, and the Anglo-American think-tanks followed with warnings the Russian Navy is about to sail into Piraeus, the object of the game [became] clear. The line for Operation Nemesis has been that Greece must be saved, not from itself or from its creditors, but from the enemy in Moscow.

Russia to Rescue Greece from Bankers

Russia is reportedly prepared to help Greece as it battles the banksters on Wall Street and Brussels. It is believed a Greek exit from the eurozone will move the country closer to Russia and deepen divisions within NATO.
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras of the socialist Syriza party said in mid-June an alignment with Russia is possible and hinted Greece was “ready to go to new seas to reach new safe ports.”
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov and Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich said during the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum Russia would consider providing loans to Greece if requested.

Greek Military Sends Strong Message

On Friday a number of Greek military officers publicly called for a “yes” vote.
“Retired General Fragkoulis Fragkos, a former defense minister and one-time head of the Greek army general staff, called for a ‘loud yes on Sunday.’ In 2011, Fragkos was cashiered by then-Prime Minister George Papandreou amid rumors of a coup,” writes Alex Lantier.

Clearly referring to Tsipras, Fragkos said that “the moral values and principles that have always defined us Greeks are not under negotiation with any clueless and historically ignorant politicianwho is advancing his own party interest.”
A group of 65 retired high-ranking officers issued a statement citing their “oath to the Fatherland and the Flag” and warning, “By choosing isolation, we place the Fatherland and its future in danger.”

Tsipras and Syriza prepared for a possible coup in January by shuffling military staff.
“The leadership (of the military and intelligence services) was changed,” sources told Heller, “but not radically. The defense minister (Panos Kammenos) is rightist so there are no ‘radicals’ in command.”

Greek Military is an Operation Gladio Asset

US intervention in Greece is nothing new. Between 1987 and 1989 the US made a concerted effort to overthrow the elected Greek government of Prime Minister Andreas Papandreou.
Prior to this in 1967 the Greek military installed the Regime of the Colonels following a coup d’état .
The Greek military was under the control of the CIA following Greece’s entrance into NATO in 1952. Elements of the Greek military were part of the CIA’s “stay behind” network under Operation Gladio and these elements (specifically LOK, or Lochoi Oreinōn Katadromōn, i.e. “Mountain Raiding Companies”) were directly involved in the 1967 coup.

http://www.infowars.com/us-preparing-coup-to-prevent-greece-from-falling-under-russian-influence/

» Notorious Hacking Firm Hit with Large-Scale Hack Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

» Notorious Hacking Firm Hit with Large-Scale Hack Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Black Woman Schools Liberals On Why Confederate Flag Not Racist (VIDEO)

woundedamericanwarrior.com

From Mad World: As they literally have no defense, there’s nothing in this world that can shut up the left faster than a black conservative. So, when a black woman stepped up to speak about their most recent hot button issue – the Confederate flag – well, let’s just say they weren’t expecting what she was about to say.
Karen Cooper is a member of The Virginia Flaggers and believes that those who disapprove of the Confederate flag “worship ignorance, historical revisionism, and Political Correctness.” Unfortunately for the left, those are just a few of her more softly spoken words.
For Karen, the Confederate flag means so much more than what so-called progressives are making it out to be, and she has lived the experience to prove it. According to the Confederate flag bearing woman, she was born in New York, where she followed the Nation of Islam. However, at some point in her life, she moved down South, where she made quite the startling revelation — “the races are more together,” allowing her to feel “more welcome in the South.”
She quickly became involved in the local community and realized that many of her newly acquired friends were members of the Tea Party. However, when people started attacking the flag she’d grown to understand and love, she just couldn’t keep quiet about it.

“I actually think that it represents freedom,” said Karen. “It represents a people who stood up to tyranny.” She then proceeded to make liberal heads explode by expressing her belief that “slavery was a choice,” as slaves had the choice to go compliantly or fight and die.
“I say that because of what Patrick Henry said: ‘Give me liberty, or give me death.’ If we went back to that kind of slavery — no I couldn’t do it. Give me death,” she went on to explain.

“I feel I’m a slave now because the federal government does control me. I can’t smoke what I want to smoke. I can’t drink what I want to drink. If I want to put something into my body, it’s my body, not theirs,” Karen noted. “That’s tyranny!”
It is because of that reason that she states she will continue to fly the flag in order to “protest those who have attacked us, our flags, our ancestors or our heritage.” She later stated, “I know what people think about when they see the battle flag: the KKK, racism, bringing slavery back. So, I knew it would be something for people to see a black woman with the battle flag.”

Bringing home the aforementioned point, she concluded by asking, “How can it be racist if I’m out there with them?” Liberals cannot stand when someone chooses to open their eyes and not blindly follow along with their oppressive agenda.

Black Woman Schools Liberals On Why Confederate Flag Not Racist (VIDEO)
Luckee 1
Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:10:41 GMT