Share

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

National Security Threats—Chain Migration and the Visa Lottery System

February 1, 2018

6 minute read

Our current immigration system jeopardizes our national security and puts American communities at risk. That’s why President Donald J. Trump has repeatedly called for common sense, mainstream immigration reforms such as ending chain migration and eliminating the visa lottery.

Chain Migration

Under our current immigration system, around 70 percent of legal immigrants admitted to the United States every year do so based on family ties rather than merit. Because most immigrants are selected on the basis of their family connections—rather than real selection criteria, like the skills they bring to our economy or their likelihood of assimilation into our society—our current family-based immigration system does not meet the needs of the modern United States economy and is incompatible with preserving our national security.

A recent joint report from the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security found that roughly three in four individuals convicted of international terrorism-related charges since September 11, 2001, were foreign-born. As the report outlines, a number of these terrorists were able to enter the United States on the basis of family ties and extended-family chain migration.

Visa Lottery

Each year, the diversity visa lottery program randomly selects up to 50,000 foreign nationals to apply for permanent residence (green cards) in the United States. Many of them have absolutely no ties to the United States, and are not required to have special skills or much education.

Randomly selecting foreign nationals from around the globe, including from state sponsors of terrorism, and admitting them into the United States invites large amounts of fraud and does not serve the national interest.

In 2004, the State Department’s Deputy Inspector General warned that the visa lottery “contains significant threats to national security as hostile intelligence officers, criminals, and terrorists attempt to use it to enter the United States as permanent residents.” In 2013, the Inspector General recorded with alarm that the visa lottery was subject to “pervasive and sophisticated fraud” perpetrated by “organized fraud rings.”

In the last decade, the United States issued nearly 30,000 immigrant visas through the visa lottery program to randomly selected nationals from countries designated as “State Sponsors of Terrorism” by the State Department. In addition, tens of thousands of immigrants admitted from these countries have been admitted permanently into the United States through other immigration categories (such as family-sponsored immigrants, as well as asylees, refugees, and others).

National Security Threats

Below are just a few examples of terrorists and criminals who entered the United States through chain migration or the visa lottery program:

Chain Migration

  • Akayed Ullah, a Bangladeshi national, entered the United States in 2011 through chain migration. Ullah was allowed to enter the country as the family member of a visa lottery winner. On December 12, 2017, Ullah allegedly attempted to detonate a homemade pipe bomb in the New York City Port Authority Bus Terminal. The failed explosion injured himself and four bystanders.
  • Ahmed Amin El-Mofty, an Egyptian national, entered the United States through a distant relative (chain migration) and became a United States citizen after arriving. Last month, El-Mofty was killed during a shootout after allegedly opening fire and targeting police at multiple locations in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
  • Zoobia Shahnaz, a national of Pakistan, entered the United States through chain migration as the distant relative of a United States citizen. On December 14, 2017, Shahnaz was indicted by the Department of Justice for allegedly laundering bitcoin and wiring funds to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
  • Mahmoud Amin Mohamed Elhassan, a national of Sudan, was admitted to the United States in 2012 as a family member of a lawful permanent resident from Sudan. In 2016, he pleaded guilty to attempting to provide material support to ISIS, and in 2017 was subsequently sentenced to 11 years in prison.
  • Khaleel Ahmed, a national of India, was admitted to the United States in 1998 as a family member of a naturalized United States citizen from India. In 2010, he was sentenced to more than eight years in prison for conspiring to provide material support to terrorists.
  • Mufid Elfgeeh, a national of Yemen, was admitted to the United States in 1997 as a family member of a naturalized United States citizen from Yemen. Elfgeeh subsequently became a United States citizen through naturalization. In 2016, Elfgeeh was sentenced to more than 22 years in prison for attempting to recruit fighters for ISIS.
  • Uzair Paracha, a national of Pakistan, was admitted to the United States in 1980 through chain migration. In 2006, he was sentenced to 30 years in Federal prison for providing material support to al Qaeda.
  • Mohamad Saeed Kodaimati, a national of Syria, was admitted to the United States in 2001 as a family member of a lawful permanent resident from Syria. Kodaimati entered the United States with the family member. That family member was previously admitted as the unmarried son or daughter of a lawful permanent resident, who earlier received status as the parent of a United States citizen. In 2016, Kodaimati was sentenced to 96 months in prison for making false statements in a terrorism investigation.

Visa Lottery

  • Sayfullo Saipov, a national of Uzbekistan, entered the United States in 2010 through the visa lottery program. On October 31, 2017, Saipov was arrested after he allegedly used a truck to run down numerous pedestrians on a bike lane on the west side of Manhattan, killing eight individuals.
  • Abdurasaul Hasanovich Juraboev, a national of Uzbekistan, was admitted to the United States as a visa lottery recipient in 2011. In 2015, he pleaded guilty to conspiring to support ISIS, and in 2017 was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
  • Ali Shukri Amin, a national of Sudan, was admitted to the United States in 1999 as the child of a visa-lottery recipient, and subsequently obtained United States citizenship through naturalization. In 2015, he was sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for conspiring to provide material support and resources to ISIS.
  • Hesham Mohamed Ali Hedayet, a national of Egypt, was able to claim Lawful Permanent Resident status through a family member who received their status via visa lottery in 1997. In July 2002, Hedayet opened fire at the El Al Airlines ticket counter at LAX airport, murdering two ticket agents and wounding three others.
  • Imran Mandhai, a national of Pakistan, was able to immigrate to the United States because he was the child of visa lottery winners. Mandhai pled guilty in August 2002 to conspiring to bomb a National Guard Armory and electrical power substations near Miami.
  • Syed Haris Ahmed, a national of Pakistan, entered the United States as a visa lottery winner. Ahmed was convicted in 2009 of terrorism-related activities in the United States and abroad.
  • Mousa Mohammed Abu Marzook, alleged United States Hamas leader, received his green card through a predecessor program to the visa lottery. Marzook was deported in 1997 for terrorist activities.

White House Logo

The White House



By The Grace of God For: Eric Davis

https://www.gofundme.com/by-the-grace-of-god-for-eric-davis

This is my brother in law whose future just smacked him in the face. Please send prayers and $ if you got it. Thanks so much in advance. #Prayers

DONATE HERE

Friday, February 2, 2018

President Trump Speaks at the 2018 House and Senate Republican Member Conference

FISA MEMO CONFIRMS SURVEILLANCE OF TRUMP CAMPAIGN WAS BASED ON DODGY STEELE DOSSIER

McCabe: No FISA warrant would have been approved without dossier

Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - FEBRUARY 2, 2018 14 Comments

FISA Memo Confirms Surveillance of Trump Campaign Was Based on Dodgy Steele Dossier

The FISA memo confirms that the FBI relied on the notorious and hyper-partisan Steele dossier to justify its surveillance of the Trump campaign.

The memo has now been declassified and made public and can be read below.

House Intelligence Committee Report On FISA Abuses by The Federalist on Scribd

“The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications,” according to the Washington Examiner.

The Steele dossier was funded by the HIllary Clinton campaign and the DNC via Fusion GPS.

“DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele’s bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.”

The memo also reportedly details how, “Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.”

The memo proves everything we’ve been saying. The Obama administration conspired with the Clinton campaign to abuse the power of government in an effort to to sabotage Trump’s campaign.

In addition, the entire “Russian collusion” narrative is a hoax based on this hyper-partisan scheme.

Reaction to the revelations are already rolling in.

Harry Khachatrian

@Harry1T6

Clinton campaign working w/ a foreign govt to concoct a damaging nonsense dossier on Trump, giving it to the FBI to open an investigation on Trump is CLEARLY proof Trump was colluding with a foreign govt #MemoDay

9:21 AM - Feb 2, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Jack Posobiec

@JackPosobiec

Reminder: Steele claims his dossier was based on Kremlin intelligence sources
We now know the FBI took Kremlin and Hillary campaign information and used it to spy on Trump

9:45 AM - Feb 2, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Tom Fitton

@TomFitton

Memo shows FISA court was misled by Comey, McCabe, Yates, and Rosenstein. Will Rosenstein be fired? Will he have to recuse himself, in the least? @RealDonaldTrump may have to act.

9:43 AM - Feb 2, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

James Woods

@RealJamesWoods

So Obama’s government, the #DNC, and members of the #MSM all conspired to fix a presidential election by deceiving a secret court allowed to spy on American citizens? Russians couldn’t have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than #Democrats have.

9:38 AM - Feb 2, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Paul Joseph Watson

@PrisonPlanet

What in this memo were FBI top brass & Dems panicking all week about being revealed aside from their own hyper-partisan corruption? #MemoDay

9:53 AM - Feb 2, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Andrew Meyer@TheAndrewMeyer

REMINDER: Dossier maker Fusion GPS has PAID JOURNALISTS.
The memo proves the FBI, media, and intelligence agents were complicit in creating fiction to spy on President Trump.
Collusion.
Bribery.
Treason.#LockThemUphttps://www.cernovich.com/chris-steele-investigate/ …

9:12 AM - Feb 2, 2018

Senators Call For Criminal Investigation Into Fusion GPS “Trump Dossier” Author

Featured Image Credit: AP Senators Chuck Grassley and Lindsay Graham have called for a criminal investigation into the Fusion GPS “Trump dossier” created by Christopher Steele, who has …

cernovich.com

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Byron York

@ByronYork

House Intel memo key point: The FBI's Andrew McCabe confirmed to the committee that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information. Story posting soon.

8:49 AM - Feb 2, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“It’s a disgrace what’s going on in our country, a lot of people should be ashamed of themselves,” President Trump commented moments ago.

This article will be updated as information becomes available.

SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:

Follow on Twitter:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Rand Paul Exposes NSA/FBI Soviet-Style Tactics

The Bitcoin Pullback: Why Elites Are Fighting

FULCRUM

FEBRUARY 01, 2018

What's happening now in cryptocurrency is that some major governments and banks are taken aback at how popular some of these Internet currencies have been over the last 6 months, and it scares them.

Bitcoin-Cover.jpg

They run what is known as a "fractional reserve banking" system, and peer to peer online currencies like Bitcoin are an existential threat to everything they do.

How does your bank make money?

Well, you give them a deposit and with that deposit, many times over the initial amount you gave them, they re-loan it and "fractionalize" it across various investments, loans, and gambles.

If you and all other customers - or even many customers - were to simultaneously demand your deposit back, the bank would be simply unable to service that demand, as the money has been loaned in the form of various long-term commitments.

Normally, there's no need for the public to withdraw all or most of their money at once, as they know their bank is FDIC insured and as the bank takes reasonable precautions to protect their balance.

Yet, if a product emerges - apples, tulips, rocketships, or peer to peer online currency software - that seems to be producing short term returns for millions of holders of cash, it is not unreasonable that consumers would withdraw... needing and wanting access to all of their purchasing power at once, to try out this new system or product, whatever it is.

Coinbase is just one cryptocurrency exchange of many reputable ones, and yet it already has 10 million customers and supports access to crypto in 32 countries around the world. The company claims the equivalent of more than $50 billion in crypto has been exchanged on its platform.

Blockchain.info, another popular cryptocurrency service working with Bitcoin and now Ether also, reportedly has users in 140 countries and now boasts 22 million total wallets on its platform.

And those are, again, simply two English language cryptocurrency services out of many others around the world - not to mention the remaining large Asian exchanges.

Cryptocurrency - this emergent product set and community - is an existential threat to not only "fractional reserve banking," but to the idea of a bank account itself!

Again, Blockchain.info services users in 140 countries. 22 million wallets. A wallet allows users to send, receive, or store online currencies 24/7. No bank holidays. Minimal fees. Settlement times between users in the minutes typically, rather than days.

For many young, Internet savvy workers and consumers around the world, this very well could be the "email account" to the archaic "post office" they've always known and used beforehand.

So no, it doesn't bother me that low-level bank employees sneer at cryptocurrency, especially when their higher-level colleagues appear to be buying. It doesn't bother me that government bureaucrats around the world have threatened to cut off their citizens' access to cryptocurrency, as aside from China, the actual damage to the global ecosystem appears very minimal. And it's so hard to stomp out P2P value sharing, which is what cryptocurrency amounts to. In fact, some have argued it is impossible to eliminate it.

An Indian bureaucrat's opinions have little impact on the tastes of a Norwegian or American or Canadian Bitcoin buyer thousands of miles away - which is the beauty of crypto, in my view.

Most important of all at the moment, these networks do not appear to be dying. More than 867,000 transactions yesterday on the Ethereum network (https://www.etherchain.org/charts/transactionsPerDay), still not far from last month's all time high of around 1.3 million transactions in a day.

Did Napster go away the first time music executives condemned it? Did Bittorrent go away with a few lawsuits? Has porn gone away with all the outcry of various moral groups and organizations over the years?

The Internet is resilient, and cryptocurrency is its first truly native product. Even email is to a large extent reliant on "email service providers" who host and maintain your inbox on a server somewhere. Crypto - if need be - could be entirely P2P. You boot up your Bitcoin or Ether wallet, send some Bitcoin to a roommate or landlord to pay your rent, and they receive it into their wallet without involving any third party or traditional financial institution whatsoever.

Regulated institutions like Coinbase are a luxury in the ecosystem, not a necessity.

And as most millennials don't own any stocks directly and view the entire traditional financial system as a thinly veiled con, I still think they are very open to experimenting wholeheartedly with new systems and ideas about money, especially systems that work natively with the Internet - the place so many millennials truly identify with.

As that population ages, they are likely to experiment MORE with peer to peer currency systems at the edges, rather than LESS. And I see no reason why they would become more faithful to the traditional systems in the future.

Although nothing here should be construed as financial advice, I am not worried. Crypto has a bright future of some kind - party on, currency revolutions are fun and necessary from time to time.

I highly recommend everybody get the newsletter. It is an incredible value, it helps support FULCRUM financially, and you'll get our weekly in-depth thoughts on crypto and politics. It is also the only way to get all future episodes of the monthly podcast interview we do. Sign up now at https://fulcrumnews.com/subscribe.

7 LIKES

SHARE

Watch Live! Memogate Release Imminent


Americans are about to be shown the corrupt nature of the Deep State.


By Infowars.com Thursday, February 01, 2018


Today, the Trump administration is set to release the FISA memo that has the Deep State running scared. The FBI and other intelligence agencies are attempting to stall the release of the memo, claiming it is inaccurate and a threat to national security.


2

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Pro-life student group surpasses 1200 chapters nationwide

Toni Airaksinen
Toni AiraksinenNew York Campus CorrespondentToday at 6:20 PM EDT

Students for Life, the nation's largest pro-life non-profit, recently surpassed more than 1,200 active students chapters, more than double that of Planned Parenthood.
Students involved in the movement spoke with Campus Reform, expressing confidence that "the pro-life generation will be on the right side of history."



The nation’s largest nonprofit dedicated to promoting the sanctity of life recently surpassed more than 1,200 active student chapters across the United States.
Founded in 1988 by Georgetown University students, the nonprofit, now known as Students for Life, seeks to educate and mobilize high-school and college students to “transform culture by helping young people make abortion unthinkable and obsolete.”
“The pro-life generation will be on the right side of history, and I'm so excited for the future of our movement."    Tweet This
[RELATED: Pro-life group hidden by abortion advocates at social justice fair]
To that end, the organization trains thousands of students every year through its annual conference and its campus programs, all of which aim to strike a delicate balance among opportunities to “converse, confront, advocate, and support.”
In addition to its pro-life advocacy, many of its chapters also provide support services for women, including fundraisers for pregnant women in need and organizing donation drives for expectant mothers.
“There are people out there that are really concerned about this atrocity, because I do think it's the biggest civil rights issue of our day,” Matt Lamb, chief communications officer of Students for Life, told Campus Reform.
Lamb explained that while Students for Life recently surpassed 1,200 chapters across the United States, more than 500 of them are based on college campuses, including the University of Kansas, the University of Mississippi, Brown University, and many more.
[RELATED: Pro-life group sues school for mandating ‘trigger warnings’]
As Campus Reform previously reported, these chapters have challenged their school’s ties to Planned Parenthood, have been protested for their “traumatizing” views, and have even filed lawsuits against their colleges to fight viewpoint discrimination.
They also provide an ideological counterpoint to the growth of Planned Parenthood on campus, which has 500 college chapters across the United States.
Kristen Wood, a student at the University of Missouri, initially joined her school’s Students for Life group during her freshman year. Now in her senior year, Wood has become the group’s president, and leads its efforts in pro-life advocacy.
“Our organization's positive impact on campus is undeniable. We grew from around 6 active members to over 30 in a single semester,” she told Campus Reform, adding that the group was even recently awarded a Chancellor’s Award from her school’s administration.
"This organization has allowed me to devote myself to a cause that is truly meaningful and even has introduced me to my closest friends,” she continued. “The pro-life generation will be on the right side of history, and I'm so excited for the future of our movement."
Audrey Nitzel joined Students for Life as the Michigan Regional Coordinator, telling Campus Reform that she’s amazed at how many students ask her “what is abortion” during her travels around the state.
[RELATED: Student for Life touts 600 more campus groups than Planned Parenthood]
“They have no clue that a genocide is occurring around them,” she remarked. “Our constitution protects our right to life and I believe that all humans, no matter race, gender, intelligence, level of dependability, location, or circumstance deserve that innate human right.”
She went on to suggest that history shows “the impact that arises” when society and the government proclaim that “a certain group of people do not deserve that right to life.”
“This discrimination has caused the holocaust and slavery and countless other infringements of our rights,” she concluded. “I support the pro-life movement because I do not support the murder of billions of human lives.”
Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Toni_Airaksinen
: @Toni_Airaksinen

Will you help expose liberal bias on America's campuses?

Campus Reform exposes the liberal bias and abuse against conservatives on America’s colleges and universities.
As a Campus Reform reader, you know about the abuse taking place at our nation’s higher education institutions, and you know how important it is to bring these stories to light.
College campuses are no longer bastions of higher learning. Professors indoctrinate students with their agendas. They even silence conservative students with their attempts to suppress free speech.
Campus Reform depends on the financial support of concerned Americans like you to report on leftist indoctrination on college campuses and uncover the blatant misconduct of university administrators, faculty, and students.
Your tax-deductible gift will expose these attacks to millions of Americans.
SUPPORT CAMPUS REFORM NOW

President Trump Delivers the State of the Union Address Tonight 9PM EST

January 30, 2018

Live 9:10 PM EST

President Trump Delivers the State of the Union Address