Share

Thursday, February 1, 2018

The Bitcoin Pullback: Why Elites Are Fighting

FULCRUM

FEBRUARY 01, 2018

What's happening now in cryptocurrency is that some major governments and banks are taken aback at how popular some of these Internet currencies have been over the last 6 months, and it scares them.

Bitcoin-Cover.jpg

They run what is known as a "fractional reserve banking" system, and peer to peer online currencies like Bitcoin are an existential threat to everything they do.

How does your bank make money?

Well, you give them a deposit and with that deposit, many times over the initial amount you gave them, they re-loan it and "fractionalize" it across various investments, loans, and gambles.

If you and all other customers - or even many customers - were to simultaneously demand your deposit back, the bank would be simply unable to service that demand, as the money has been loaned in the form of various long-term commitments.

Normally, there's no need for the public to withdraw all or most of their money at once, as they know their bank is FDIC insured and as the bank takes reasonable precautions to protect their balance.

Yet, if a product emerges - apples, tulips, rocketships, or peer to peer online currency software - that seems to be producing short term returns for millions of holders of cash, it is not unreasonable that consumers would withdraw... needing and wanting access to all of their purchasing power at once, to try out this new system or product, whatever it is.

Coinbase is just one cryptocurrency exchange of many reputable ones, and yet it already has 10 million customers and supports access to crypto in 32 countries around the world. The company claims the equivalent of more than $50 billion in crypto has been exchanged on its platform.

Blockchain.info, another popular cryptocurrency service working with Bitcoin and now Ether also, reportedly has users in 140 countries and now boasts 22 million total wallets on its platform.

And those are, again, simply two English language cryptocurrency services out of many others around the world - not to mention the remaining large Asian exchanges.

Cryptocurrency - this emergent product set and community - is an existential threat to not only "fractional reserve banking," but to the idea of a bank account itself!

Again, Blockchain.info services users in 140 countries. 22 million wallets. A wallet allows users to send, receive, or store online currencies 24/7. No bank holidays. Minimal fees. Settlement times between users in the minutes typically, rather than days.

For many young, Internet savvy workers and consumers around the world, this very well could be the "email account" to the archaic "post office" they've always known and used beforehand.

So no, it doesn't bother me that low-level bank employees sneer at cryptocurrency, especially when their higher-level colleagues appear to be buying. It doesn't bother me that government bureaucrats around the world have threatened to cut off their citizens' access to cryptocurrency, as aside from China, the actual damage to the global ecosystem appears very minimal. And it's so hard to stomp out P2P value sharing, which is what cryptocurrency amounts to. In fact, some have argued it is impossible to eliminate it.

An Indian bureaucrat's opinions have little impact on the tastes of a Norwegian or American or Canadian Bitcoin buyer thousands of miles away - which is the beauty of crypto, in my view.

Most important of all at the moment, these networks do not appear to be dying. More than 867,000 transactions yesterday on the Ethereum network (https://www.etherchain.org/charts/transactionsPerDay), still not far from last month's all time high of around 1.3 million transactions in a day.

Did Napster go away the first time music executives condemned it? Did Bittorrent go away with a few lawsuits? Has porn gone away with all the outcry of various moral groups and organizations over the years?

The Internet is resilient, and cryptocurrency is its first truly native product. Even email is to a large extent reliant on "email service providers" who host and maintain your inbox on a server somewhere. Crypto - if need be - could be entirely P2P. You boot up your Bitcoin or Ether wallet, send some Bitcoin to a roommate or landlord to pay your rent, and they receive it into their wallet without involving any third party or traditional financial institution whatsoever.

Regulated institutions like Coinbase are a luxury in the ecosystem, not a necessity.

And as most millennials don't own any stocks directly and view the entire traditional financial system as a thinly veiled con, I still think they are very open to experimenting wholeheartedly with new systems and ideas about money, especially systems that work natively with the Internet - the place so many millennials truly identify with.

As that population ages, they are likely to experiment MORE with peer to peer currency systems at the edges, rather than LESS. And I see no reason why they would become more faithful to the traditional systems in the future.

Although nothing here should be construed as financial advice, I am not worried. Crypto has a bright future of some kind - party on, currency revolutions are fun and necessary from time to time.

I highly recommend everybody get the newsletter. It is an incredible value, it helps support FULCRUM financially, and you'll get our weekly in-depth thoughts on crypto and politics. It is also the only way to get all future episodes of the monthly podcast interview we do. Sign up now at https://fulcrumnews.com/subscribe.

7 LIKES

SHARE

Watch Live! Memogate Release Imminent


Americans are about to be shown the corrupt nature of the Deep State.


By Infowars.com Thursday, February 01, 2018


Today, the Trump administration is set to release the FISA memo that has the Deep State running scared. The FBI and other intelligence agencies are attempting to stall the release of the memo, claiming it is inaccurate and a threat to national security.


2

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Pro-life student group surpasses 1200 chapters nationwide

Toni Airaksinen
Toni AiraksinenNew York Campus CorrespondentToday at 6:20 PM EDT

Students for Life, the nation's largest pro-life non-profit, recently surpassed more than 1,200 active students chapters, more than double that of Planned Parenthood.
Students involved in the movement spoke with Campus Reform, expressing confidence that "the pro-life generation will be on the right side of history."



The nation’s largest nonprofit dedicated to promoting the sanctity of life recently surpassed more than 1,200 active student chapters across the United States.
Founded in 1988 by Georgetown University students, the nonprofit, now known as Students for Life, seeks to educate and mobilize high-school and college students to “transform culture by helping young people make abortion unthinkable and obsolete.”
“The pro-life generation will be on the right side of history, and I'm so excited for the future of our movement."    Tweet This
[RELATED: Pro-life group hidden by abortion advocates at social justice fair]
To that end, the organization trains thousands of students every year through its annual conference and its campus programs, all of which aim to strike a delicate balance among opportunities to “converse, confront, advocate, and support.”
In addition to its pro-life advocacy, many of its chapters also provide support services for women, including fundraisers for pregnant women in need and organizing donation drives for expectant mothers.
“There are people out there that are really concerned about this atrocity, because I do think it's the biggest civil rights issue of our day,” Matt Lamb, chief communications officer of Students for Life, told Campus Reform.
Lamb explained that while Students for Life recently surpassed 1,200 chapters across the United States, more than 500 of them are based on college campuses, including the University of Kansas, the University of Mississippi, Brown University, and many more.
[RELATED: Pro-life group sues school for mandating ‘trigger warnings’]
As Campus Reform previously reported, these chapters have challenged their school’s ties to Planned Parenthood, have been protested for their “traumatizing” views, and have even filed lawsuits against their colleges to fight viewpoint discrimination.
They also provide an ideological counterpoint to the growth of Planned Parenthood on campus, which has 500 college chapters across the United States.
Kristen Wood, a student at the University of Missouri, initially joined her school’s Students for Life group during her freshman year. Now in her senior year, Wood has become the group’s president, and leads its efforts in pro-life advocacy.
“Our organization's positive impact on campus is undeniable. We grew from around 6 active members to over 30 in a single semester,” she told Campus Reform, adding that the group was even recently awarded a Chancellor’s Award from her school’s administration.
"This organization has allowed me to devote myself to a cause that is truly meaningful and even has introduced me to my closest friends,” she continued. “The pro-life generation will be on the right side of history, and I'm so excited for the future of our movement."
Audrey Nitzel joined Students for Life as the Michigan Regional Coordinator, telling Campus Reform that she’s amazed at how many students ask her “what is abortion” during her travels around the state.
[RELATED: Student for Life touts 600 more campus groups than Planned Parenthood]
“They have no clue that a genocide is occurring around them,” she remarked. “Our constitution protects our right to life and I believe that all humans, no matter race, gender, intelligence, level of dependability, location, or circumstance deserve that innate human right.”
She went on to suggest that history shows “the impact that arises” when society and the government proclaim that “a certain group of people do not deserve that right to life.”
“This discrimination has caused the holocaust and slavery and countless other infringements of our rights,” she concluded. “I support the pro-life movement because I do not support the murder of billions of human lives.”
Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Toni_Airaksinen
: @Toni_Airaksinen

Will you help expose liberal bias on America's campuses?

Campus Reform exposes the liberal bias and abuse against conservatives on America’s colleges and universities.
As a Campus Reform reader, you know about the abuse taking place at our nation’s higher education institutions, and you know how important it is to bring these stories to light.
College campuses are no longer bastions of higher learning. Professors indoctrinate students with their agendas. They even silence conservative students with their attempts to suppress free speech.
Campus Reform depends on the financial support of concerned Americans like you to report on leftist indoctrination on college campuses and uncover the blatant misconduct of university administrators, faculty, and students.
Your tax-deductible gift will expose these attacks to millions of Americans.
SUPPORT CAMPUS REFORM NOW

President Trump Delivers the State of the Union Address Tonight 9PM EST

January 30, 2018

Live 9:10 PM EST

President Trump Delivers the State of the Union Address

Monday, January 29, 2018

McCabe Is Going To Sing Like A Canary

FBI’s McCabe Escorted From The Building, 2010


McCabe Lashed Out at Colleagues Who Demanded He Resign, 2011

McCabe Threatens to Torch the FBI, 2012

Sunday, January 28, 2018

What Is QAnon? What Is The Storm? What Is Next?

FTC, FDA Warn Companies about Marketing and Selling Opioid Cessation Products

January 26, 2018

By:

Federal Trade Commission

ALL NEWS

FTC, SAMHSA also issue fact sheet on how to get the right help for addiction and withdrawal

The Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today posted warning letters to the marketers and distributors of 11 opioid cessation products for illegally marketing products with unproven claims about their ability to help in the treatment of opioid addiction and withdrawal.

“Opioid addiction is a serious health epidemic that affects millions of Americans,” said Acting FTC Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen. “Individuals and their loved ones who struggle with this disease need real help, not unproven treatments. We will continue to work together with the FDA to address this important issue.”

Health fraud scams like these can pose serious health risks. These products have not been demonstrated to be safe or effective and may keep some patients from seeking appropriate, FDA-approved therapies. Selling these unapproved products with claims that they can treat opioid addiction and withdrawal is a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Making unsubstantiated therapeutic claims is also a violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits deceptive advertising.

Also today, the FTC, in coordination with SAMHSA of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), issued a fact sheet to help consumers get real help for opioid addiction or withdrawal, while avoiding products that promise but do not deliver help. The fact sheet has tips that consumers and health practitioners alike can share with those considering help for opioid addiction or withdrawal. Patients receiving FDA-approved medication-assisted treatment cut their risk of death in half, according to SAMHSA.

The FDA and FTC issued joint warning letters to 11 companies for their products: Opiate Freedom Center (Opiate Freedom 5-Pack); U4Life, LLC (Mitadone); CalmSupport, LLC (CalmSupport); TaperAid (TaperAid & TaperAid Complete); Medicus Holistic Alternatives, LLC (Natracet); NutraCore Health Products, LLC (Opiate Detox Pro); Healthy Healing, LLC (Withdrawal Support); Soothedrawal, Inc. (Soothedrawal); Choice Detox Center, Inc. (Nofeel); GUNA, Inc. (GUNA-ADDICT 1); and King Bio, Inc. (AddictaPlex).

The FTC sent four additional warning letters to other marketers of opioid cessation products.

All of the companies use online platforms to make unproven claims about their products’ ability to cure, treat, or prevent a disease. Examples of claims made include:

  • “#1 Selling Opiate Withdrawal Brand”
  • “Imagine a life without the irritability, cravings, restlessness, excitability, exhaustion and discomfort associated with the nightmare of addiction and withdrawal symptoms.”
  • “Safe and effective natural supplements that work to ease many physical symptoms of opiate withdrawal.”
  • “Break the pain killer habit.”
  • “Relieve Your Symptoms…addiction, withdrawal, cravings.”

The FTC and FDA have requested responses from each of the companies within 15 working days. The companies are directed to inform each agency of the specific actions taken to address each agency’s concerns. The warning letters also state that failure to correct violations may result in law enforcement action such as seizure or injunction.

Health care professionals and consumers are encouraged to report any adverse events related to these products to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program. To file a report, use the MedWatch Online Voluntary Reporting Form.The completed form can be submitted online or via fax to 800-FDA-0178.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, promotes and protects the public health by, among other things, assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.

For more information click here.

Trump Ignores DOJ Warning, Notifies Sessions He Wants FISA Memo Released

Profile picture for user Tyler Durdenby Tyler Durden

Sun, 01/28/2018 - 19:55

President Trump broke with the Department of Justice last week by calling for the release of a four-page "FISA memo" purportedly summarizing widespread surveillance absues by the FBI, DOJ and Obama Administration, reports the Washington Post.

The President's desire was relayed to Attorney General Jeff Sessions by White House Chief-of-Staff John Kelly last Wednesday - putting the Trump White House at odds with the DOJ - which said that releasing the classified memo written by congressional republicans "extraordinarily reckless" without allowing the Department of Justice to first review the memo detailing its own criminal malfeasance during and after the 2016 presidential election.

The decision to release the memo ultimately lies with congress.

Somehow WaPo knew that Kelly and Sessions spoke twice last Wednesday - once in person during a "small-group afternoon meeting" and again that night over the phone.

Trump "is inclined to have that released just because it will shed light," said a senior administration official who was speaking on the condition of anonymity to recount private conversations. "Apparently all the rumors are that it will shed light, it will help the investigators come to a conclusion."

The memo, written by staffers for House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), was made available for all Congressional House members in mid-January for viewing in a secure room. Lawmakers who have seen the document have called for its release to the general public, as it is said to contain "jaw dropping" revelations of extensive abuse of power and highly illegal collusion between the Obama administration, the FBI, the DOJ and the Clinton Campaign against Donald Trump and his team during and after the 2016 presidential election.

"I have read the memo," tweeted Rep. Steve King (R-IA), adding "The sickening reality has set in. I no longer hold out hope there is an innocent explanation for the information the public has seen. I have long said it is worse than Watergate. It was #neverTrump & #alwaysHillary. #releasethememo."

"It is so alarming the American people have to see this," Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan told Fox News. "It's troubling. It is shocking," North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows said. "Part of me wishes that I didn't read it because I don't want to believe that those kinds of things could be happening in this country that I call home and love so much."

Lee Zeldin

@RepLeeZeldin

Immediately #ReleaseTheMemo #FISAMemo & ALL relevant material sourced in it. Every American needs to know the truth! We wouldn't be revealing any sources & methods that we shouldn't; only feds' reliance on bad sources & methods.

5:28 PM - Jan 18, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Meanwhile, The Washington Post is spinning Trump's desire to release the memo as yet another example of the President's "year-long attempts to shape and influence an investigation that is fundamentally outside his control," pointing to reports that he wanted to fire special counsel Robert Mueller III last summer (which Trump denies). WaPo also points to Trump's complaints over Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for not properly supervising the Mueller probe, and the President's alleged comments to former FBI Director James Comey demanding loyalty and asking him to back off the investigation into former National Security advisor Michael Flynn, who was fired for misleading Vice President Mice Pence over his contact with Russians.

In other words, Trump has been resisting an active investigation which has yet to prove any collusion, and which has experienced significant mission creep into the personal finances of the Trump team - and The Washington Post is spinning it as Trump once again interfering with an investigation.

So now the President is calling for the release of the four-page FISA memo, which will reportedly put an end to the Russia investigation while quite possibly setting the stage for the criminal prosecution of those involved in trying to frame Trump.

That said, the Washington Post article appears to be nothing more than an exercise in pearl clutching over Trump's demands for loyalty - as the paper notes that nothing the President has done is likely to lead to criminal charges.

To prove obstruction of justice, Mueller would have to show that Trump didn't just act to derail the investigation but did so with a corrupt motive, such as an effort to hide his own misdeeds. Legal experts are divided over whether the Constitution allows for the president to be indicted while in office. As a result, Mueller might seek to outline his findings about Trump's actions in a written report rather than bring them in court through criminal charges. It would probably fall to Rosenstein to decide whether to submit the report to Congress, which has the power to open impeachment proceedings.

As Trump faced growing questions about everything from his June directive to fire Mueller to his more recent grousing about Rosenstein, the White House was largely silent. In response to several specific queries, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley offered a written statement that addressed few of them. -WaPo

"The president has been clear publicly and privately that he wants absolute transparency throughout this process," Gidley said in the statement. "Based on numerous news reports, top officials at the FBI have engaged in conduct that shows show bias against President Trump and bias for Hillary Clinton. The president has said repeatedly for months there is no consideration of terminating the special counsel."

So future leaders of the free world take note; you're not allowed express dissatisfaction when a federal agency allegedly colludes with the previous administration and an establishment candidate to rob you of an election using unverified evidence from Russian officials; it is also frowned upon to have a problem with a kangaroo-court witch hunt launched to push the invented narrative.

http://go.shr.lc/2FoNymq

Mueller Redacts Newly Found Texts??, 2008

Trump White House Assistant Marc Short: Trump Supports Transparency - Wants Memo Released (VIDEO)

Trump White House Assistant Marc Short: Trump Supports Transparency - Wants Memo Released (VIDEO)