Share

Sunday, December 17, 2017

Why It’s Becoming Increasingly Obvious Adam Schiff Probably Leaked Trump Jr.-WikiLeaks #FakeNews To CNN

December 16, 2017 by Joshua Caplan 103 Comments

In a letter sent to Congressman Michael Conaway (R-TX) this week, Donald Trump Jr. attorney Alan S. Futerfas, called for an investigation into leaks from the House Intelligence Committee, suggesting the individual who leaked the false WikiLeaks story did so knowingly. 

But first, here is a recap of the “story.”

The mainstream media embarrassed itself once again after it was caught pushing ‘Trump-Russia’ fake news. Both CNN and CBS fell for inaccurate reports alleging a WikiLeaks email was sent to Donald Trump Jr. with an encryption key to access future leaks.

However, WikiLeaks had tweeted a link to the information to the general public days before the email reached Trump Jr. inbox.

Washington Post reports:

A 2016 email sent to President Trump and top aides pointed the campaign to hacked documents from the Democratic National Committee that had already been made public by the group WikiLeaks a day earlier. The email — sent the afternoon of Sept. 14, 2016 — noted that “Wikileaks has uploaded another (huge 678 mb) archive of files from the DNC” and included a link and a “decryption key,” according to a copy obtained by The Washington Post. The writer, who said his name was Michael J. Erickson and described himself as the president of an aviation management company, sent the message to the then-Republican nominee as well as his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and other top advisers. The day before, WikiLeaks had tweeted links to what the group said was 678.4 megabytes of DNC documents. The full email — which was first described to CNN as being sent on Sept. 4, 10 days earlier — indicates that the writer may have simply been flagging information that was already widely available.

“The Sept. 14 email to Trump campaign advertising WikiLeaks emails promoted publicly available info, was riddled with typos and came from a Trump backer who had given $40 to the campaign months earlier, per email viewed by @WSJ,” confirmed Wall Street Journal reporter Rebecca Ballhaus.

Rebecca Ballhaus

@rebeccaballhaus

The Sept. 14 email to Trump campaign advertising WikiLeaks emails promoted publicly available info, was riddled with typos and came from a Trump backer who had given $40 to the campaign months earlier, per email viewed by @WSJ.

10:14 AM - Dec 8, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Now back to Futerfas’ letter to Conaway:

“From the moment the Erickson email story broke at 8 a.m. on Dec. 7 until the moment [CNN] issued [its] retraction at about 4 p.m. that same day, the individuals responsible for disseminating this inaccurate information to the press stood by and did nothing, all the while knowing that the story they had leaked was inaccurate and that the implications thereby suggested were grossly misleading,” wrote Futerfas.

“Republicans suspect that the staff of Rep. Adam Schiff, California Democrat, leaked the erroneous “scoop” to CNN. They say his staff regularly leaks, with CNN being a favorite, with a spin that is not accurate,” wrote Rowan Scarborough of The Washington Times.

All eyes are on ranking member of the House Select Intel Committee Rep Adam Schiff as being the leaker.

James Freeman of the Wall Street Journal asked Monday, “Is CNN protecting Adam Schiff?”

That’s the hope anyway. In practice Rep. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.) rarely misses an opportunity to publicly characterize the non-public information that he claims to have seen. This raises the question of whether he’s violating the rules of the committee by discussing classified intelligence, or perhaps misleading the public about what he’s seen. Before giving him yet another platform to hurl allegations of treasonous behavior, journalists should first demand that he show up with some facts.

As previously reported, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint against Ranking Member of the Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff and Rep. Jackie Speier for violating House ethics rules in April for disclosing “classified information to the public in violation of House ethics rules.”

As The Gateway Pundit‘s Cristina Laila pointed out on Friday, Schiff came unhinged after Mueller, Rosenstein and co. came under fire following reports about FBI agent Peter Strzok’s anti-Trump text messages and revelations concerning Justice Department Bruce Ohr’s demotion for his contacts with Fusion GPS. It’s also plausible Schiff’s meltdown down is in part because of an effort by Trump Jr. to find the leaker.

Below is Schiff’s tweetstorm:

I’m increasingly worried Republicans will shut down the House Intelligence Committee investigation at the end of the month.  Here’s why:

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

I’m increasingly worried Republicans will shut down the House Intelligence Committee investigation at the end of the month.
Here’s why:

10:32 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“Since March, our investigation has made important progress. We’ve interviewed numerous key witnesses behind closed doors, held public hearings, reviewed thousands of documents, identified new leads — all to understand and expose Russia’s meddling and protect our democracy.”

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

I’m increasingly worried Republicans will shut down the House Intelligence Committee investigation at the end of the month.
Here’s why:

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Since March, our investigation has made important progress. We’ve interviewed numerous key witnesses behind closed doors, held public hearings, reviewed thousands of documents, identified new leads — all to understand and expose Russia's meddling and protect our democracy.

10:33 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“Yet, Republicans have scheduled no witnesses after next Friday and none in 2017. We have dozens of outstanding witnesses on key aspects of our investigation that they refuse to contact and many document requests they continue to sit on.”

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Replying to @RepAdamSchiff

Since March, our investigation has made important progress. We’ve interviewed numerous key witnesses behind closed doors, held public hearings, reviewed thousands of documents, identified new leads — all to understand and expose Russia's meddling and protect our democracy.

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Yet, Republicans have scheduled no witnesses after next Friday and none in 2017. We have dozens of outstanding witnesses on key aspects of our investigation that they refuse to contact and many document requests they continue to sit on.

10:34 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“It appears Republicans want to conduct just enough interviews to give the impression of a serious investigation.”

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Replying to @RepAdamSchiff

Yet, Republicans have scheduled no witnesses after next Friday and none in 2017. We have dozens of outstanding witnesses on key aspects of our investigation that they refuse to contact and many document requests they continue to sit on.

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

It appears Republicans want to conduct just enough interviews to give the impression of a serious investigation.

10:35 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“Next week, they scheduled critical witness interviews out of state, when we are voting on the tax bill and vital government funding bills and no Members will be able to ask questions, in an effort to squeeze them in before end of year. These witnesses are willing to come to DC.”

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Replying to @RepAdamSchiff

It appears Republicans want to conduct just enough interviews to give the impression of a serious investigation.

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Next week, they scheduled critical witness interviews out of state, when we are voting on the tax bill and vital government funding bills and no Members will be able to ask questions, in an effort to squeeze them in before end of year.
These witnesses are willing to come to DC.

10:37 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“Despite our repeated urging, Majority has declined to issue subpoenas in numerous avenues of the investigation, where there’s simply no other way to get the information. Some refusals we’ve made public, like witnesses hiding behind nonexistent privileges, many others we haven’t.”

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Replying to @RepAdamSchiff

Next week, they scheduled critical witness interviews out of state, when we are voting on the tax bill and vital government funding bills and no Members will be able to ask questions, in an effort to squeeze them in before end of year.
These witnesses are willing to come to DC.

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Despite our repeated urging, Majority has declined to issue subpoenas in numerous avenues of the investigation, where there's simply no other way to get the information. Some refusals we’ve made public, like witnesses hiding behind nonexistent privileges, many others we haven’t.

10:38 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“The responsibility to conduct a thorough investigation, or to prevent one, ultimately falls on @SpeakerRyan. I’m concerned he’s heeding the calls of Bannon and @POTUS to “DO SOMETHING” by closing down the Russia investigation & opening up another investigation of Hilary Clinton.”

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Replying to @RepAdamSchiff

Despite our repeated urging, Majority has declined to issue subpoenas in numerous avenues of the investigation, where there's simply no other way to get the information. Some refusals we’ve made public, like witnesses hiding behind nonexistent privileges, many others we haven’t.

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

The responsibility to conduct a thorough investigation, or to prevent one, ultimately falls on @SpeakerRyan. I’m concerned he's heeding the calls of Bannon and @POTUS to “DO SOMETHING” by closing down the Russia investigation & opening up another investigation of Hilary Clinton.

10:40 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“Beyond our investigation, here’s what has me really concerned: The attacks on Mueller, DOJ and FBI this week make it clear they plan to go after Mueller’s investigation. Aggressively and soon,” added Schiff.

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Replying to @RepAdamSchiff

The responsibility to conduct a thorough investigation, or to prevent one, ultimately falls on @SpeakerRyan. I’m concerned he's heeding the calls of Bannon and @POTUS to “DO SOMETHING” by closing down the Russia investigation & opening up another investigation of Hilary Clinton.

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Beyond our investigation, here’s what has me really concerned: The attacks on Mueller, DOJ and FBI this week make it clear they plan to go after Mueller’s investigation.
Aggressively and soon.

10:41 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“By shutting down the congressional investigations when they continue to discover new and important evidence, the White House can exert tremendous pressure to end or curtail Mueller’s investigation or cast doubt on it. We cannot let that happen,” Schiff concluded.

15 Dec

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

Replying to @RepAdamSchiff and 2 others

Beyond our investigation, here’s what has me really concerned: The attacks on Mueller, DOJ and FBI this week make it clear they plan to go after Mueller’s investigation.
Aggressively and soon.

Adam Schiff

@RepAdamSchiff

By shutting down the congressional investigations when they continue to discover new and important evidence, the White House can exert tremendous pressure to end or curtail Mueller’s investigation or cast doubt on it. We cannot let that happen.

10:43 AM - Dec 15, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

As Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller pointed out, CNN has yet to provide a full explanation as to why they published the story, opting instead to protect its sources. Reporters, some more direct than others, pointed to Rep. Schiff as being the source for the false story.

Jeffrey Blehar of Decision Desk HQ says sources have told him ‘Dems on the House Intelligence committee intentionally misled CNN to affect news cycle,’ in respect to the ‘massively botched,’ Donald Trump Jr. / WikiLeaks story. Some were more direct than others.

Jeff B/DDHQ

@EsotericCD

.@ChuckRossDC drills down into what informed ppl are already telling me was source of CNN's massively botched DJT Jr/Wikileaks: Dems on the House Intelligence committee intentionally misleading CNN to affect news cycle: http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/08/cnn-botches-major-bombshell-alleging-contacts-between-don-jr-and-wikileaks/ …

3:47 PM - Dec 8, 2017

CNN Botches Major ‘Bombshell’ Alleging Contacts Between Don Jr. And WikiLeaks Via @dailycaller

Oops!

dailycaller.com

Twitter Ads info and privacy

The Federalist’s Sean Davis tweeted, “If CNN is worried about its credibility, it will burn its source. If it wants to protect Adam Schiff and his political agenda, it’ll stay mum about who lied.”

Sean Davis

@seanmdav

If CNN is worried about its credibility, it will burn its source. If it wants to protect Adam Schiff and his political agenda, it'll stay mum about who lied. https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/939246887676317696 …

1:55 PM - Dec 8, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Former NYPD officer and The Rebel radio host John Cardillo noted Rep. Adam Schiff “seems awfully nervous that his leaking might be investigated.”

“We see how well being a leaker went for Reince’s career,” added Cardillo.

The tweet was retweeted by Trump Jr., seemingly suggesting the president’s son believes the Democrat lawmaker was the leaker.

Nick Short of Michelle Malkin Investigates tweeted Fox News correspondent Ed Henry’s report about how “Schiff was seen leaving the room multiple times,” during Trump Jr.’s closed door testimony before House investigators.

Nick Short

@PoliticalShort

.@edhenry last night reported that during the closed door testimony by Trump Jr. before the House Intel Committee on Dec 6th, Adam Schiff was seen leaving the room multiple times, stories then started popping up on CNN about the testimony while it was ongoing...

10:09 AM - Dec 16, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“As Trump Jr. and his attorney said in a letter to the House Intel Committee this week, while DTJr was still being interviewed, “members of the committee and/or staff began selectively leaking information provided during the interview to various press outlets, most notably CNN,” tweeted Short.

22h

Nick Short

@PoliticalShort

.@edhenry last night reported that during the closed door testimony by Trump Jr. before the House Intel Committee on Dec 6th, Adam Schiff was seen leaving the room multiple times, stories then started popping up on CNN about the testimony while it was ongoing... pic.twitter.com/oRel4b1BpB

Nick Short

@PoliticalShort

As Trump Jr. and his attorney said in a letter to the House Intel Committee this week, while DTJr was still being interviewed, “members of the committee and/or staff began selectively leaking information provided during the interview to various press outlets, most notably CNN.”

10:11 AM - Dec 16, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy

“Moreover, after the interview, several members of the Minority, including Schiff, Speier and Swalwell, appeared on the news to discuss certain details of the interview in an attempt to discredit Trump Jr,” added Short.

21h

Nick Short

@PoliticalShort

Replying to @PoliticalShort @edhenry

As Trump Jr. and his attorney said in a letter to the House Intel Committee this week, while DTJr was still being interviewed, “members of the committee and/or staff began selectively leaking information provided during the interview to various press outlets, most notably CNN.”

Nick Short

@PoliticalShort

Moreover, after the interview, several members of the Minority, including Schiff, Speier and Swalwell, appeared on the news to discuss certain details of the interview in an attempt to discredit Trump Jr. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/12/donald-trump-jr-requests-inquiry-into-committee-leaks.html …pic.twitter.com/mLKQnd5Uyg

10:12 AM - Dec 16, 2017

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Twitter Ads info and privacy

The lawmaker’s office vehemently denied the charges, stating “Ranking Member Schiff and his staff do not leak classified or confidential information, and any disclosure of non-public information by the congressional committees undertaking investigations is singularly unhelpful.”

A frantic tweetstorm coupled with savvy media folks pointing the finger at Schiff amid an ongoing ethics complaint brought by justice-seeking missile Judicial Watch, makes it increasingly obvious that the old adage “where there’s smoke there’s fire,” applies to the Democrat lawmaker’s case as being the source of the false Trump Jr.-WikiLeaks story.

Saturday, December 16, 2017

It's Time To End Chain Migration | The White House

It's Time To End Chain Migration | The White House

Soros-funded Women’s Group Hosts ‘Confront White Womanhood’ Panel

Soros-funded Women’s Group Hosts ‘Confront White Womanhood’ Panel

BREAKING: Investigative reporter says DOZENS of Reps will resign within next 72 hours; "Mark my words...

BREAKING: Investigative reporter says DOZENS of Reps will resign within next 72 hours; "Mark my words...

EU Freaks Out As Bitcoin Usage Skyrockets

The Votes Are in: Obama's 'Net Neutrality' Is Ending “This is a case of classic government overreach...”

By Jason Hopkins
December 14, 2017 at 11:18am

The Federal Communications Commissions voted Thursday to roll back net neutrality, a set of rules enacted under the Obama administration that greatly regulated how internet service providers can treat traffic on their networks.

Five people make up the commission, and the vote fell along party lines, with three Republicans — including FCC Chairman Ajit Pai — voting in favor of undoing net neutrality rules. Two Democrats voted against the measure, as seen on the FCC website.

As Pai explained in the months leading up to the vote, he believed net neutrality rules were unnecessary, burdensome regulations placed upon internet service providers, otherwise known as ISPs.

Under the net neutrality rules enacted in 2015, broadband providers must treat all traffic equally, without slowing or blocking content, and are not allowed to provide “fast lanes” for favored sites that would be willing to pay more for better service.

Critics of the Obama-era guidelines argue the rules are not needed and only serve to stifle innovation and infrastructure investment.

“This is a case of classic government overreach,” argued Pai. “The previous administration trying to solve a problem that didn’t exist and making the internet economy worse then it had to be.”

“We find that these heavy-handed regulations have led to less investment in high-speed networks, less innovation in terms of services and they simply weren’t necessary. I think it’s critical we return to the free market, light-touch vision that governed the internet from the very beginning.”

However, supporters believe these regulations placed upon ISPs are necessary in providing a fair internet experience, warning that big service providers, such as Comcast and Verizon, will have the power to dictate who gets premier internet service, to the detriment of smaller online companies.

Interestingly enough, both sides argue their approach is better for small business. Pai and other critics of net neutrality say rolling back the regulations will allow small providers to compete with big providers and be in the best interest of consumers.

Supporters, though, argue the rules are crucial in allowing small content startups to be able to compete with big content companies such as Netflix or Facebook.

The debate proved to be extremely controversial, with supporters of net neutrality demonstrating a surprising amount of passion over the issue.

“Your plan gives a broadband provider the ability to significantly alter their subscribers’ internet experience,” three dozen Democrat lawmakers wrote in a letter to Chairman Pai, a plea for him to scrap the vote.

“Once adopted, this proposal will permit that provider to freely block, slow down or manipulate a consumer’s access to the internet as long as it discloses those practices.”

Internet activists rallied in support of net neutrality on sites such as Reddit, garnering major attention and mobilizing online campaigns aimed at contacting congressman urging them to oppose the changes.

View image on Twitter

View image on Twitter

Cory Doctorow

@doctorow

Net neutrality activists just took over Reddit with protest posts https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/12/net-neutrality-activists-just-took-over-reddit-with-protest-posts/ …

11:11 AM - Dec 1, 2017

Unfortunately for Pai — an Indian-American who was appointed to his current position by President Donald Trump — he has been forced to endure harassment and racist attacks by critics.

Pro-net neutrality activists posted signs outside his Virginia home last month listing his children by name while calling him an “evil” man who “murdered democracy,” according to The Daily Caller.

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Brendan Bordelon

@BrendanBordelon

I have a friend that lives near @AjitPaiFCC. Net neutrality "activists" posted these signs, featuring his children's names, outside his house. Pizzas also reportedly sent to his house every half-hour last night.

5:47 AM - Nov 25, 2017

“I would also hope that people, and not just the anonymous folks, but some of the publicly named people, publicly prominent people, who’ve said, ‘Oh, well yeah, he’s not a real Indian American because, you know, he’s taking this position, you know, the Indian American community disavows him.’” Pai said, referencing people who have questioned his Indian heritage.

“And, you know, it’s just the kind of ridiculous commentary that, if the tables were turned, I think they would quite confidently call it racist,” he added.

Opponents gathered outside the FCC building ahead of Thursday’s vote in a last-minute show of force. With the vote over and the rules now rolled back, Democrats on Capitol Hill have vowed to press on and take the fight to Congress.

Tags: Congress, Democrats, Donald Trump, FCC, Internet, Obama administration, Republicans

By: Jason Hopkins on December 14, 2017 at 11:18am

http://go.shr.lc/2k2HPL1

President Trump’s Weekly Address: 12/16/2017

President Trump Delivers a Statement Upon Departure 12/16/2017