Satanists Rally Behind Socialist Sanders!

Anatomy Of The Deep State: An Open Conspiracy

Feb 11 - What is the "deep state"? Is it a secret national security apparatus that spies on us and operates "black sites" overseas? Some judicial star chamber ruling in secret? Well, partly. But as Mike Lofgren, author of "The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government" points out, the whole truth is comparatively banal. The deep state consists of the multiple layers of government and quasi-government bureaucracies and the myriad of cottage industries they spring up around them, including the military-industrial complex and the election-industrial complex. They operate out in the open and are almost completely overlooked, while Americans instead to turn their attention to the latest election. But elections change very little in Washington with the deep state in the driver's seat:

Coming to Terms With Iraq

written by jacob g. hornberger friday february 12, 2016

 

It seems that Iraq will continue to haunt the American people for the indefinite future. And it should. Including the Persian Gulf intervention, the 11 years of sanctions, the no-fly zones, the post-9/11 invasion and and occupation, and the post-occupation bombing, the U.S. government has killed, injured, and maimed several hundreds of thousands of Iraqi citizens.

There is also the massive destruction of homes, businesses, automobiles, infrastructure, and other property in Iraq.

There are also the Iraqis who were rounded up, tortured, sexually abused, or executed, including those at Abu Ghraib.

Finally, today there are US presidential candidates who are practically foaming at the mouth in the hope that they will have the opportunity to order US troops to wreak even more death and destruction on Iraq, this time under the rationale of attacking ISIS.

Through it all, the American people have patriotically praised the troops, thanking them for their service in Iraq, expressing gratitude for protecting our rights and freedoms.

There is one significant fact that many Americans simply have not yet come to grips with: Neither the Iraqi government nor the Iraqi people ever attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. In that sense, every single Iraqi who has been killed, injured, or maimed or had his business or home or other property destroyed by US troops was innocent of that wrongdoing.

Until Americans come to grips with that important fact — that the US government has wrongfully killed several hundreds of thousands of innocent people in Iraq, I believe that Iraq will continue to haunt the American people for the rest of their lives.

Think of just the people who were tortured and sexually abused at Abu Ghraib. As they were being subjected to the brutality of the CIA and the Pentagon, one can easily imagine some of them asking, “Why are you doing this to me? What have I done to you to deserve this?”

Of course, the justification that US officials used at the time was that they had invaded Iraq to search for Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. But there were always problems with that justification, ones that many Americans still don’t want to deal with.

One, it was the United States and other Western regimes that furnished Saddam Hussein those WMDs. (See here and here.) That took place in the 1980s, when the US government was partnering with Saddam in his war against Iran. The reason the US government delivered those WMDs to Saddam was so that he could kill Iranians with them.

Recall that when US troops finally discovered WMDs in Iraq, buried and rusted out, US officials kept the find secret. Why would they do that? Wouldn’t that have been the perfect opportunity to say, “See, see—we were right!”? The reason they kept the find secret is that they didn’t want Americans to find out that the WMDs had been made in America and knowingly delivered to Saddam as part of the US-Saddam partnership to kill Iranians during the 1980s.

Two, the US government never had any legal authority to invade Iraq to search for WMDs. That’s because the US government was purportedly enforcing UN resolutions when it invaded Iraq to search for WMDs. But only the UN can enforce its resolutions and it did not authorize any invasion to enforce its WMD resolutions, in large part because it’s inspectors had already determined that there were no WMDs to find.

Three, the US government had already killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children with sanctions for the purpose of achieving regime change in Iraq. Recall US Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright’s infamous position that she declared to Sixty Minutes: that the deaths of half-a-million Iraq children from the sanctions were “worth it.” In their post 9/11 fear, Americans blinded themselves to the fact that US officials were using the WMD scare as a way to frighten them into supporting an invasion to accomplish a regime change that the sanctions had failed to accomplished.

Fourth, and perhaps most important, once it was determined that Saddam had been telling the truth and that he had in fact destroyed the WMDs that the US government had delivered to him during the 1980s, Americans continued supporting ten more years of military occupation, a brutal occupation in which countless more Iraqis were killed, tortured, incarcerated, abused, injured, and maimed and in which US bombs destroyed countless more buildings, homes, and infrastructure.

Through the entire occupation, Americans continued thanking the troops for their service in Iraq—glorifying them for defending our rights and freedoms.

Do you see something wrong with that picture?

Soon after the invasion, US officials determined that there were no WMDs — that Saddam had in fact destroyed the WMDs that the US government had delivered to him during the 1980s. The UN had been proven right in its decision not to enforce its resolutions with a military invasion of Iraq.

Yet, the WMDs had been the official justification for the invasion. That’s why Americans had supported it. That’s why US troops had been torturing, killing, and maiming Iraqis and destroying their homes, businesses, and properties.

At that point, the official justification for all that killing and destruction was gone. At that point, there was only one right course of action for US officials to take: apologize for their “mistake,” make amends for the death and destruction they had already wreaked with their “erroneous” invasion, and bring the troops home.

That’s not what they did. Instead, they remained in Iraq for 11 long years, killing, maiming, torturing, injuring, incarcerating, abusing, and humiliating more and more Iraqi people, all with the support of the American people, who by this time knew that the WMD rationale for the invasion had turned out to be bogus.

I repeat an important fact: Every one of those Iraqis who were killed, maimed, tortured, injured, abused, or humiliated had never attacked the United States nor had their government. In that sense, they were entirely innocent victims of US aggression against their country.

Why did US officials go through all the contortions of the WMD scare instead of just invading to effect regime change?

Two reasons: First, they knew that initiating a war against another country for the purpose of effecting regime change was a war crime as per Nuremberg and also pursuant to the laws of the United Nations. Two, they wanted Americans to think that US troops were defending America rather than aggressing against a Third World nation.

The irony in all this is that it was Iraq that was always the defending nation and it was always the US government that was the aggressing nation. It was the US government that was the war criminal the entire time. Under international law and the law set forth at Nuremberg, the Iraqi people had the absolute right to defend themselves from US aggression. Yet, US officials continually referred to Iraqis as the “bad guys” whenever they defended themselves against the foreign troops that had wrongfully invaded and occupied their land and glorified the troops for killing people who were doing nothing more than defending their country from foreign aggression. Would Americans consider themselves to be “bad guys” if they were defending the United States from a foreign invasion?

What has always been so bizarre is how Americans just continued mindlessly thanking the troops for “defending our rights and freedoms” in Iraq. They simply blinded themselves to the fact that our “rights and freedoms” were never threatened by the Iraqi government or the Iraqi people. At the risk of repeating myself, they had never attacked the United States or even threatened to do so. All they had done was defend themselves from troops who were instruments of foreign aggression against their country.

ISIS? It’s largely composed of people in the Saddam Hussein regime who were ousted from power in the US regime-change operation. Why should it surprise anyone that they are now trying to get back into power? People who are thrown out of power by foreign aggression don’t usually like that. That’s why there is now a civil war in Iraq, one that has spread to other areas that have been the targets of other US regime-change operations. It’s not the first time that a US regime-change operation has led to a violent civil war. Recall Guatemala, where the CIA’s coup in 1954 led to a decades-long civil war that killed hundreds of thousands of people.

Today, many Americans go gaga every time a US presidential candidate says that he’ll order the troops to kill even more Iraqis, this time in the name of destroying ISIS, which is the latest official enemy in the ever-changing cast of official enemies of the US national-security state. Americans would be better off putting such candidates in their place by booing them and by demanding, once and for all, that all US troops be brought home before they kill, maim, torture, or injure even one more person in the Middle East.

Reprinted with permission from the Future of Freedom Foundation.

The Three Republican Stooges Who Would Draft Your Daughters

written by shane kastler

thursday february 11, 2016

We have a word in English to describe the act of taking someone against their will and forcing them to work for you. It's called slavery. One form of this, indeed the most heinous form of this, would be a military draft. Because this particular form of slavery involves much more than being forced to pick cotton on a plantation; it involves the high possibility of being blown to smithereens on a battlefield. All while working a profession that you did not choose, fighting a war that you might not agree with, to benefit politicians that you probably don't even know. Regardless of whether you are drafting men or women; the very premise of a draft is completely at odds with the idea of liberty.

Drafting men is evil. Drafting women is evil and insane.

Some would say that drafts are sometimes necessary to defend liberty. But what type of liberty is this defending? The liberty of a nation to say that certain people have no liberty at all? That certain people are required by law to be killed if their government gods dictate it is so? To die for such a liberty as this is to die for liberty as a myth. True liberty means you choose what you will and won't do with your life. And no one, including the self-perceived federal masters can force you to.

The great economist Walter Williams (who happens to be black) once stated that requiring young men to register for the draft is like asking black people to register for slavery, just in case the government decides they want to change their mind and re-institute it. Williams dramatic illustration is right on point. Should black people be forced to do something against their will just because they are black? Of course not. Should 18-25 year old males be forced to? Presently they at least have to “register” to be government slaves even though there currently is no draft. And if some people have their way this military slavery should be extended and forced upon our daughters as well. This is taking an already evil practice; and expanding the evil to include even more unwilling participants. And Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Chris Christie are fine with that. The Larry, Moe, and Curly of the recent Republican debates stated this without reservation. And their answers to the question of women being drafted were bizarre at best.

All three of these hacks tried to spin the question to mean “opportunity for women.” Christie said, “There is no reason why one young woman should be discriminated against from registering for the selecting service. The fact is we need to be a party and a people that makes sure that our women in this country understand anything they can dream, anything they want to aspire to, they can do.” With all do respect, what the heck is Christie talking about?!?!? Who “dreams” of being drafted? If a woman dreams of serving in the military she can VOLUNTEER for that! A draft means you're taking someone against their will and FORCING them to serve. That's not a dream, its a nightmare! Christie is either ignorant of what a draft is, or he's banking on the fact that YOU are ignorant of what a draft is, or he was trying to dodge the question by sounding “inclusive.” My belief is that Christie was not speaking out of ignorance. He knows full well about the government's power to force it's views on it's citizens because he's done it numerous times as governor of New Jersey. Christie isn't stupid. Rubio, on the other hand, might very well be.

Rubio was exposed, ironically enough by Christie himself, to be the mindless political hack that he is. When confronted on his readiness to be President, Rubio dove into his canned mantra about “the fiction that Barack Obama doesn't know what he is doing....” Even when Christie openly mocked Rubio and twice pointed out that Rubio was simply repeating a canned line that his advisers gave him, Rubio inexplicably continued to repeat it. While sweating profusely and giggling nervously, Rubio showed no ability whatsoever to think on his feet and engage in a true debate when knocked off of his talking points. Rubio exhibited for all the world to see why so many Americans are disgusted with politics in general, and politicians in specific. Rubio the Robot is likely finished as a candidate and will soon head back to Little Havana where he can charm the deceived dolts that put him into office. And the sooner he is gone the better, for he too would gladly take your daughters and have them blown up on the battlefield for his benefit. Here's what he said in response to the question of drafting women: “I do believe that selective service should be opened up to both men and women if a draft is ever re-instituted.”

Similar to Christie, Rubio tried to spin it as an “equal opportunity” for women. As though it would be discriminatory to not force women to die the same way we would force men to. And so I repeat my previous point that the “opportunity” to serve already exists by volunteering for service. Forced servitude is not an “opportunity.” It is slavery. A slavery that Rubio supports.

And what about Jeb Bush? What do we make of him? He's simply pathetic. From day one in this campaign he has run as fast as he could from the Bush name. Until now that he is being pummeled in the poles. Now he has his aged mother shilling for him in New Hampshire in the vain hopes that the Bush monarchy might continue. But Jeb is soon to be finished as well. Thankfully. Here's his take on drafting women: “I think that we should not impose any kind of political agenda on the military. There should be—if women can meet the requirements, the minimum requirements, for combat service, they ought to have the right to do it, for sure.” More nonsensical drivel from the third of the three stooges. And once again we see a putrid attempt to dress up the draft with language of “rights.” A woman has the “right” to be drafted. Earth to Bush, “Being forced to do something against your will isn't a right!” In fact a “right” is just the opposite. Women have the “right” to be left alone and pursue whatever occupation they please. So do men. But not in Bush's world.

Some see this talk of the military draft as a moot point since currently we have no draft. But the very fact that young men are still required BY LAW to register for a hypothetical draft proves the point that hypothetical slavery is still possible. If any one of these poor excuses for a man had any real nerve they would have blasted the entire idea of a draft as being anti-liberty. They would have cried out with loudest voice that they would never dream of sending someone else's son to die against his will just to protect their interests. And they most certainly would had the spine to refuse, even the thought, of sending daughters to die for their interests. The fact is we have a very limited freedom in America today. Rubio is free to wear his fancy Italian boots. Christie is free to eat until his gut is content. And Bush is free to sip fine wine and nibble on caviar. I'm glad we have such freedom. But I'm not glad that these three stooges would be willing to have my daughters (or my son) killed so they can live like the king pigs of the national pig pen. They should be ashamed. I doubt they are, but they should be.

Reprinted with permission from Target Liberty.

Study Proves Electromagnetic Fields Can Amplify Pain

Alex Pietrowski, Staff
Waking Times

If you’ve ever wondered if the thousands of cell phone towers and electromagnetic signals permeating society nowadays could be potentially harmful to your body, mind and to the natural environment, you’re not alone. A small minority of people are so sensitive to electromagnetic radiation they’ve even been forced to move into cave-like domiciles designed to insulate them from such signals. We are, after all, energetic beings, as are all lifeforms, and although something may lie outside of our ordinary perception does not imply that it is harmless.

It turns out that electromagnetic signals from cell phone towers do in fact directly affect the human body in physical ways, and surprisingly, for amputees, common cellular signals can amplify sensations of pain in the body, when in the presence of such emissions.

A recently completed study led by members The University of Texas at Dallas gives concrete evidence that these types of now ubiquitous signals can actually amplify pain in some amputees by immediately stimulating nerve tissue that had suffered traumatic damage.

Prior to this study, the bulk of research into cell tower radiation focused on people without any pre-existing conditions or serious health issues, however, when a disabled veteran who lost limbs in the Iraq war alerted his physicians to the fact that his sense of pain seemed to increase dramatically whenever his cell phone went into roaming mode, a study was launched to test this hypothesis on lab rats.

“Our study provides evidence, for the first time, that subjects exposed to cellphone towers at low, regular levels can actually perceive pain,” said Dr. Mario Romero-Ortega, senior author of the study and an associate professor of bioengineering in the University’s Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science. “Our study also points to a specific nerve pathway that may contribute to our main finding.” [1]

This is the first study of its kind that has found a direct link to immediate physical changes in the human body when absorbing cell tower radiation.

“Until a recent study led by researchers at The University of Texas at Dallas was published online last month in PLOS ONE, there was no scientific evidence to back up the anecdotal stories of people, such as Underwood, who reported aberrant sensations and neuropathic pain around cellphone towers and other technology that produce radio-frequency electromagnetic fields.” [1]

To validate the wounded soldier’s claim that pain was amplified by cell tower signals researchers crafted a simulation using lab rats who were subjected to the types and levels of electromagnetic radiation that many of us are exposed to everyday.

“To test this, the team randomly assigned 20 rats into two groups — one receiving a nerve injury that simulated amputation, and the other group receiving a sham treatment. Researchers then exposed the subjects to a radiofrequency electromagnetic antenna for 10 minutes, once per week for eight weeks. The antenna delivered a power density equal to that measured at 39 meters from a local cellphone tower — a power density that a person might encounter outside of occupational settings.

Researchers found that by the fourth week, 88 percent of subjects in the nerve-injured group demonstrated a behavioral pain response, while only one subject in the sham group exhibited pain at a single time point, and that was during the first week.” [1]

These towers are being installed across the world right now, right amongst densely populated areas and even on public school grounds. Cell phones have already been proven to cause brain cancer, yet the both the cell industry and the general public refuse to consider this sufficient reason to re-think the use and widespread proliferation of this technology.

Now that we have evidence that cell tower signals can amplify pain, is it that unreasonable to consider that cell tower radiation may be causing other health problems that we simply have yet to identify?

Read more articles from Alex Pietrowski.

About the Author

Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.

Sources:

[1] http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2016/2/3-31891_Study-Uncovers-How-Electromagnetic-Fields-Amplify-_story-wide.html

This article (Study Proves Electromagnetic Fields from Cell Towers Can Amplify Pain) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2016/02/11/study-proves-electromagnetic-fields-from-cell-towers-can-amplify-pain/

EXCLUSIVE– Donald J. Trump First Candidate to Reply to the ‘Sessions Test’

AP

by Breitbart News8 Feb 2016Washington D.C.6,232

On February 5th, Breitbart News exclusively reported that

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)

issued a list of five questions that all candidates must answer if they wish to seek the Republican nomination. In recent years, Sessions has emerged as the intellectual thought leader of the nation-state conservative movement. Sessions has articulated how mass immigration combined with reckless trade deals is compressing wages and decimating America’s middle class.

Sessions’ questionnaire consisted of five straightforward questions addressing immigration, trade, and crime in the United States.

The first candidate to reply to Sessions’ questionnaire was GOP frontrunner Donald J. Trump. In his response, Trump declares, “After my inauguration, for the first time in decades, Americans will wake up in a country where their immigration laws are enforced.”

Trump’s full, unedited answers to the Sessions’ test are below:

Question 1: How would you vote (or how did you vote) on fast-track, and would you support or oppose advancing a final trade agreement which enters the United States into a new international commission with binding authority on future United States trade policy?

ANSWER: I was steadfastly opposed to giving Obama his Fast-Track powers, and would have absolutely voted against it. This is one of the strongest distinctions between me and the other candidates in this race.  The Congress, apparently under the magical spell of donors, gave massive new powers to a President who has repeatedly abused his authority.  The other candidates in this race actually fought on Obama’s side to give him more power to abuse.

As for creating a new international commission with authority over United States trade policy I am, again, steadfastly opposed.  No foreign power should be given any control over the United States.  Yet the other candidates who supported Fast Track allowed President Obama to do just that.  It’s not too late to save our sovereignty: when I win the nomination, I will put America back in charge.

Question 2: If the vote on the Trans-Pacific Partnership were held today, and you had a vote to cast in Congress, would you vote for it or against it?

ANSWER: I have strongly and consistently opposed the TPP.  For decades, I have warned about how our terrible trade deals are killing the middle class.  We are getting taken to the cleaners.  My message on trade has been consistent from the beginning, and if politicians had listened to me years ago we would have saved millions of jobs, rebuilt our crumbling infrastructure, and saved trillions of dollars.

My candidacy is the only way to stop this terrible deal that will send our manufacturing – including our auto manufacturing – overseas.

TPP allows foreign countries to cheat by manipulating their currency, making it impossible for American companies to fairly compete.  Yet other candidates in this race have voted in favor of the currency manipulation that is killing our middle class.

What our incompetent leaders don’t understand is that the United States holds all the cards.  Other countries need access to our markets.  Yet we refuse to use that leverage, and we negotiate one terrible job-killing deal after another.  We buy from other countries, but they refuse to buy from us.

Under my Administration, we are bringing these jobs back to America.  No more one-sided deals.

Stopping the TPP is a matter of economic security and national security.  When I am the nominee, I will stop Obamatrade in its tracks and bring millions of new voters into our party — putting new states in play in the general election.

Question 3: Upon entering office, will you promptly and unconditionally terminate and rescind all of President Obama’s illegal executive amnesties – which provide work permits and entitlements to illegal aliens – including President Obama’s first executive amnesty in 2012, which remains in effect?

ANSWER: I will immediately cancel both of President Obama’s illegal executive amnesties, and all other unconstitutional executive orders.  After my inauguration, for the first time in decades, Americans will wake up in a country where their immigration laws are enforced.

Question 4: A supermajority of GOP voters say immigration is too high. Every year, on autopilot, we let in another one million immigrants on green cards, 700,000 foreign guest workers, half a million foreign students, and 100,000 refugees and asylees. Historical precedent would be to reduce record-breaking immigration, rather than continuing to surge it beyond all historical precedent. Will you support legislation to reduce immigration numbers, and will you oppose legislation that would add to the number?

ANSWER: I will support legislation to reduce the numbers, and will oppose legislation to increase the numbers.  I have laid out a detailed plan to accomplish this goal on my website www.DonaldJTrump.com.  My suggested reforms include a requirement to give all open jobs to Americans first — instead of importing foreign replacements.  This plan will appeal to voters from all walks of life by making it easier for workers in this country to find jobs and support their families.  It will also help minority workers, youth, and previous immigrants who face intense job competition from waves of incoming foreign workers.

I also proposed a temporary timeout on Muslim immigration until we can figure out what is going on and get our security situation under control.

Question 5: Today, law enforcement are under increasing scrutiny and face excessive criticism from the political elites and the media, and are being targeted by criminals and terrorists. Meanwhile, since 2011, the federal prison population has declined by over 20,000, and is on track to be at its lowest level since 2005. Since 2009, the total state prison population has dropped every year, and is over 56,000 lower than it was then. These circumstances may have contributed to a nationwide spike in crime. The FBI recently reported an overall increase in violent crime and a 17 percent increase in homicides in the nation’s 50 largest cities. At the same time, the CDC reports that heroin and opioid drug overdoses have reached an all-time record high. Do you support efforts by President Obama and some Republicans in Congress to reduce penalties for drug-trafficking and further reduce the federal prison population, or do you think government should do more to keep drug traffickers off the streets?

ANSWER: The way our cops are being treated is terrible, and our spineless politicians are not defending them.  Some politicians are mute, others are throwing fuel on the fire.

Policing saves lives, especially in our poorest communities.  Policing makes schools safe, increases property values, encourages investment and job growth.  We must stop attacks on police.  I have been the only candidate with a clear message on this issue.  As for drug traffickers, they are wreaking havoc on our communities and I oppose efforts to reduce penalties for drug traffickers: we must do more to keep traffickers out of our neighborhoods.

I have been pro-law enforcement all of my life.  The American people are crying out for safer communities, and I will bring this message of supporting law enforcement and safe communities to a general election.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/08/exclusive-donald-j-trump-first-candidate-reply-sessions-test/

Judicial Watch: New Emails Show Hillary Clinton and Aides Had Classified Information on Non-Government Email Accounts

FEBRUARY 09, 2016

Hillary Clinton Forwarded Huma Abedin Classified Info. for Printing

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released nearly 70 pages of State Department records that show that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides, Deputy Chiefs of Staff Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan, received and sent classified information on their non-state.gov email accounts.  The documents, also available on the State Department website, were obtained in response to a court order from a May 5, 2015,lawsuit filed against the State Department (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)) after it failed to respond to a March 18 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking:

• All emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-“state.gov” email address.

The new documents show that Hillary Clinton used the clintonemail.com system to ask Huma Abedin (also on a non-state.gov email account) to print two March 2011 emails, which were sent from former British Prime Minister Tony Blair (using the moniker “aclb”) to Jake Sullivan on Sullivan’s non-state.gov email account.  The Obama State Department redacted the Blair emails under Exemption (b)(1) which allows the withholding of classified material.  The material is marked as being classified as “Foreign government information” and “foreign relations or foreign activities of the US, including confidential sources.”

Another email shows that Clinton wanted to know how meetings in Washington, including a four-hour meeting concerning America’s war on Libya, would impact her Hampton vacation.  Responding to an email that details the sensitive meetings in DC, Clinton emails Abedin on August 26, 2011, “Ok. What time would I get back to Hamptons?”  Again, this email discussion takes place on non-state.gov email accounts.

The documents also include advice to Clinton on Libya from Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton Foundation employee who, according to a Judicial Watch investigative report, also had business interests in Libya.  Clinton wanted Blumenthal’s March 9, 2011, Libya memo to be printed “without any identifiers.”

The newly released Abedin emails include a lengthy exchange giving precise details of Clinton’s schedule using unsecured government emails. The email from Lona J. Valmoro, former Special Assistant to Secretary of State Clinton, to Abedin and Clinton reveals exact times (including driving times) and locations of all appointments throughout the day. Another itinerary email provides details about a meeting at the United Nations in New York at 3:00 on Tuesday, January 31, 2012, with the precise disclosure, “that would mean wheels up from Andrews at approximately 12:00pm/12:15pm.”

“These emails show that Hillary Clinton isn’t the only Obama official who should be worried about being prosecuted for mishandling classified information.  Her former top State aides (and current campaign advisers) Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan should be in the dock, as well,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “The Obama State Department has now confirmed that Clinton, Abedin, and Sullivan used unsecured, non-government email accounts to communicate information that should now be withheld from the American people ‘in the interest of national defense or foreign policy, and properly classified.’ When can we expect the indictments?”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-emails-show-hillary-clinton-and-aides-had-classified-information-on-non-government-email-accounts/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Judicial%20Watch%20Tipsheet%20-%20Template%202%20(8)&utm_content=

‘THE SPEED OF EXECUTION’ OF A TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ‘WOULD BE LIKE SOMETHING NEVER SEEN BEFORE’

- FEBRUARY 09, 2016 -Breitbart

“He doesn’t need this job,” said Eric Trump, “He’s doing it because America has given him everything in the world. It’s given him an amazing company. It’s given him us as a family. It’s given him great success and the country is just going down the tube.”
“We’ve got nineteen trillion dollars worth of debt. We’re going bankrupt. We’ve got a nation that’s ranked 28th in the world in terms of education. You have Third World countries that are beating us in terms of educating our youth and he problems go on and on,” he added.
“That’s why he hopped into this. That’s why he self-funded. Very simply, it’s love of country” that’s motivating his Father Donald to run for President, said his son, Eric.

It’s not an enjoyable process. It’s a tough process. You’re getting hit from every angle. You’re getting beat up everyday. It’s a very expensive process. Again, he’s putting his money where his mouth is. He’s doing it because he loves this country and he can’t stand the incompetence of what’s happening. We have leaders out there who have never made payroll themselves. We have leaders out there who can’t balance their own checkbooks, let alone the national debt and national expenditures. That’s why he’s doing it and he would do such a great job whipping this into shape.

“The speed of execution at which we’d work as a government under Trump would be like something never seen before. He has high expectations … he loves this nation, that’s why he’s in the race. He’s not doing it because he’s bored and needs another job”, concluded Donald Trump’s son Eric.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/09/2979373/

NEIL KEENAN UPDATE | They Are All Watching You: ‘Malaysia’

FEBRUARY 9, 2016 / KEENAN TEAM | GROUPK / 25 COMMENTS

A few days ago I received an anonymous message advising me that a major global scam was about to take place that would inflict economic damage beyond belief on most of the world.

They Are All Watching You: ‘Malaysia’

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak

At first I shook my head to make sure everything was actually working right and that I was reading it right, and hearing right and so on. Once I said ‘okay let’s get down to it’ and find out where this is taking us - I learned that in just one more day; on February 9 2016, this scam would be taking place (the deal has now been postponed until after the Chinese New Year).

The players are ‘major players’ on the Eastern stage being manipulated by the Western or Western-educated. There is no question we are talking about the New World Order and the one person they are squeezing is Malaysia’s Prime Minister: Najib Razak.

The Prime Minister is apparently a good man who walked into a very bad situation, but it was his doing that set the entire situation off.

You can read about this all over the internet but this is not what the problem is.

This could be considered an internal problem but is in fact far greater than just Malaysia, seeing it effects many nations which thereby creates a second level part of the scam, or the scurry to find the funds to cover up the first scam.

This second level is meant not only to enslave the Malaysian people / economy for the next 49 years to their new founded foreign masters, but it would put a quick finish to the USD as we know it.

You see, the $USD14 Trillion in a cash deposit, in an offshore bank is what is of grave concern now.  It is real and it is deposited, but the Feds, the CIA, Switzerland and others – have made it clear to this person that these funds cannot be used.

Swiss Attorney General Michael Lauber

Yet, here we have this sneaking up onto center stage ready to engulf the world and destroy many an economy – and who is responsible for this? No other than “Bongbong”, who is the previous Philippino President, Ferdinand Marcos’ son; Ferdinand (Bongbong) Romualdez Marcos, Jr. born September 13, 1957 - widely known as Bongbong Marcos.

Bongbong Marcos

As many in my circle know, President Marcos was an appointed M1, not electedand he was a nominee for the Dragon Family. He was never a depositor of assets but a holder of them; and it was predominantly family assets that were used to develop most of the world at that time.

The payments relating to the leasing of these assets would end up in many bunkers throughout Asia and this is from where the $14 Trillion arose.

Allegedly, this grand amount emerged from much smaller beginnings; but went into a trade (PPP) and turned and rolled-over and rolled and rolled until it became such a number.

It is real and it is in place, but it cannot be used as it would destroy much of the world’s economy, and if not destroy then damage.

The releasing of such funds would destroy the world reserve USD as it is now – and inevitably it is on a course to destroy itself, with the Kazarian Mafia characters running the US show – and intent on doing  just this.

But this play by Bongbong is pushing the time schedule forward to today, not tomorrow.

He might be part of the plan seeing he is New World Order as his father was, but if so then – why is he intentionally not listening to those that are telling him he cannot do anything with such an amount?

Why? Because he has the green light to move forward and if so then it is up to the rest of the world to stop such a move.  It is destructive enough to each and every nation.

4.5 Riggits to $1 USD is the exchange to take place on February 9, 2016. (The deal has now been postponed, in order to sneak it through around / after the Chinese New Year).

30% of this is to be returned to kickback the Cabal cronies who are involved in the deal with the rest being turned over to Bongbong.

The original 1MBD deal was so shaky that even Goldman Sachs has run away from it, with Chairman Tim Leissner resigning his post in Singapore.

He has taken “personal leave” amidst corruption scandals associated with Malaysia’s state-owned 1MDB fund, with which Goldman Sachs worked closely - and they seem to be getting the hell out of Dodge.

On the other hand the PM would love for this to end BUT he has nowhere to go.

Mr. Razak is to be the scapegoat for this entire fiasco and he is helpless. They have cornered him and are about to toss him under the ‘world’ bus.

In the meanwhile there has been political infighting for the PM’s position as well as the Governor of the Bank and this smells like something we are getting used to – that being the New World Order.

Yeah, they would love to get their guy into the PM’s position or Governor of the bank and if so then they control Malaysia and would have begun their Asian conquest.

This one is not very hard for us to figure out but it might be difficult to prevent this from happening, so everyone needs to call the Governor of the Central Banks’ office and let them know that we are aware of this scam, and “All eyes are on you” - and we do not want or need it. Our plate is full thank you!

Remember this is not a David Copperfield magic act – this is just the fact that now you see it and now you don’t… One minute Malaysia will have $14 Trillion minus the 30% kickbacks and the next day they will have nothing. That leaves Mr. Marcos with the Trillions in Ringgits, and the Malaysian Government with absolutely Nothing, and the New World Order Brokers with 30%.

What more does one have to say? On the other hand yes you will have a new PM and or Governor of the Central Bank and I guess you could bet your eye tooth they will be positioned into place by the NWO, similar to what we have already seen in Italy and Greece.

Remember, from what I have seen from accounts; Bongbong never held any such numbers in any account and if something had been left to him in his fathers’ will (I have read the will) then he should understand his father was a Nominee not a Depositor – and there is a big difference.

Should anything transpire of such significant magnitude, then the banks have to be personally held responsible; along with Bongbong and the lower level players who are being paid to shut up,  and they must all be tossed into the mix and brought to justice.

Malaysia – you have your hands full but you can do it with just a few phone calls to the PM’s and AG’s office immediately.

You must stop this. The world must stop this. Let them know you are watching them because right now as I write this the satellites in the skies are on them and the jails are getting warmed up for them.

One final note and I want those involved in this to think about what I say:

“If I know the above then can you imagine what they know and will do with you when they arrest you?”

”I am only the messenger but I want to prevent this so this is why I submit it for the world at large to see.” – Neil Keenan

The picture graphic below provides the Malaysian names, corporations and government representatives involved with the 1MDB, you can see for yourself who’s who in this game.  Many have fled or are about to flee but others stay for greed.

1MDB Saga: The Players: (But in many ways they are also the scapegoats)

Click here to open a larger version of this image in a new window

One further question I have is “If they are allowed to dump $14 Trillion USD into the Market just how much value will the US Dollar have?”

I will tell you how much… and I have no idea of the money game… Nothing!

Neil Keenan & Group K.

Video:

Copyright © 2016, GROUP K, Ltd.

http://neilkeenan.com/neil-keenan-update-they-are-all-watching-you-malaysia/

‘Mandatory Depression Screening is A Depressing Thought’ By Former Congressman Doctor Ron Paul

written by ron paul

sunday february 7, 2016

The United States Preventive Services Task Force recently recommended mandatory depression screening for all Americans. The task force wants to force health insurance companies to pay for the screening. Basic economics, as well as the Obamacare disaster, should have shown this task force that government health insurance mandates harm Americans.
Government health insurance mandates raise the price of health insurance. Consumers will respond to this increase by either choosing to not carry health insurance or by reducing their consumption of other goods and services. Imposing new health insurance mandates will thus make consumers, many of whom are already suffering from Obamacare’s costly mandates, worse off by forcing them to deviate from their preferred consumption patterns.
Mandatory depression screening will not just raise insurance costs. In order to ensure that the screening mandate is being properly implemented, the government will need to create a database containing the results of the screenings. Those anti-gun politicians who want to forbid anyone labeled “mentally ill” from owning a firearm will no doubt want to use this database as a tool to deprive individuals of their Second Amendment rights.
If the preventive task force has its way, Americans could lose their Second Amendment, and possibly other, rights simply because they happened to undergo their mandatory depression screening when they were coping with a loved one’s passing or a divorce, or simply having a bad day. As anyone who has been mistakenly placed on the terrorist watch list can attest, it is very difficult to get off a government database even when the government clearly is in error. Thus, anyone mistakenly labeled as depressed will have to spend a great deal of time and money in what may be a futile attempt to get his rights back.
Mandatory depression screening will endanger people’s health by increasing the use of psychotropic drugs. These drugs often have dangerous side effects. Their use has even been linked to suicide. The fact that almost every mass shooter was on psychotropic drugs is another good reason to oppose any policy that will increase reliance on these medicines.
The Preventive Services Task Force’s mandatory depression screening mandate is based on the fallacy that diagnosing mental health problems is analogous to diagnosing cancer or diabetes. Even mental health professionals acknowledge that there is a great deal of subjectivity in mental health diagnosis.
Consider that until 1973 homosexuality was considered a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association. Today, some mental health professionals think that those who believe in limited government, free-market economics, or traditional values suffer from mental disorders. If mandatory depression screening becomes a reality, it is likely this mental health screening will be expanded to cover screening for other mental illnesses. This could result in anyone with an unpopular political belief or lifestyle choice being labeled as “mentally ill.”
Even if mandatory health screening could be implementing without increasing costs or threatening liberty it would still be a bad idea. Government health care mandates undermine the basic principles of a free society. If it is legitimate for government to tell us what types of health care we must receive, then it is also legitimate for the government to tell us what to eat, when to exercise, and even how to raise our children. To paraphrase C.S. Lewis, a tyranny imposed for our own good is the worst form of tyranny because it is a tyranny without limits. All who love liberty must therefore oppose mandatory depression screening, or any other health care mandate.
-------------

Do you have your copy of Ron Paul's Swords Into Plowshares? Consider it a handbook for peace -- pick up your copy here.

---

Copyright © 2016 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute

Related

• Ron Paul: Why Are US Special Forces in 81 Countries? - 27 April 2015
• A Return to the Peace Party - 28 April 2015
• Unending War on Terror - 28 April 2015
• Absolute Perversion of the Law in US Drone Killings - 13 March 2014
• Who's Starving Yemen's Children? - 29 April 2015