Share

Monday, July 13, 2015

VIDEO: AMERICANS WANT TO REPEAL 1ST AMENDMENT ‘BECAUSE BEYONCE SAID SO’

"Yeah, it gets people thinking. I like it."

by STEVE WATSON | INFOWARS | JULY 13, 2015


Activist Mark Dice, who routinely exposes the increasingly worrying stupidity of the nation at large, told a bunch of beach goers that “singing stripper” Beyonce had called for repealing the First Amendment, then asked them if they agreed with her. Everyone he interviewed bar one person said they did.

Falsely stating that Beyonce had performed a big concert at an annual secret Bohemian Grove gathering, knowing full well that virtually no one would have a clue what that is, Dice also claimed that Beyonce had called for limiting freedom of speech in order to temper racism.

Of course, this is all pure BS that almost anyone would realise is farcical – that is, if they used their brain at all.

However, almost every single person Dice spoke to not only unquestioningly accepted that Beyonce had said those things, they then said that they AGREED with her and that other people should jump on board with the movement.

“Absolutely, people listen to her, she definitely has a voice around everybody,” one woman said when Dice asked if Americans should heed her call to repeal the First Amendment.

“So that’s the right idea, you think… to repeal the First Amendment?” Dice asked the woman for clarification.

“Yeah, it gets people thinking. I like it.” the woman immediately replied without realizing the devastating irony in her answer.

Speaking with another woman, Dice asked if everyone should support Beyonce’s plan to repeal the First Amendment.

“Of course,” she replied, adding that “racism still hasn’t changed much,” and agreeing that free speech “facilitates that”.

“Lets go with it!” another person told Dice when he asked them if it was time to scrap the Bill of Rights at Beyonce’s behest. “She probably knows what’s best.” Dice deadpanned.

Another shifty looking character clearly had no clue what the First Amendment even was, and essentially just repeated back what Dice said to him, claiming that without Beyonce’s plan “there’s a lot of violence.”

The guy then looked utterly confused when Dice told him he disagreed and explained that the Bill of Rights is the foundation of freedom in America.

“Ok, well I think she should because other than that, people think alike, so maybe so.” the guy nonsensically replied.

“So you disagree with me and agree with Beyonce?” Dice asked.

“Yeah pretty much.” the guy answered.

Only one person Dice encountered realized how ridiculous what he was saying was, “No, dude, I don’t give a sh*t what she has to say,” the man stated, adding “Is she really the person that should be on the forefront of fighting racism?”

“So you mean you wouldn’t mindlessly believe anything that she has to say?” DIce asked.

When the guy confirmed that he would not, Dice told him that he’d “been trying to find someone like you.”

“Someone normal you mean?” the guy balked.

“Unfortunately mentally enslaved moron is the new normal.” Dice quipped, telling the man “thank you for thinking.”

Dice’s findings highlight how many Americans are completely brainwashed, particularly by celebrity culture – indicating just how dangerous it can be when celebrities, whether knowingly or ignorantly, really get behind issues that are detrimental to our fundamental rights.

—————————————————————-

Steve Watson is a London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

Welcome to the ALEX JONES INFOWARS STORE

Welcome to the ALEX JONES INFOWARS STORE



ALEX JONES INFOWARS STORE



Best health products bar none!  Extremely reasonable too!


GOVERNMENT SECRET POLICE PROGRAM EXPOSED

Federal agencies teaching agents how to fabricate evidence and commit perjury under oath in order to conceal illegal sources of investigations, otherwise known as 'parallel construction'

by INFOWARS.COM | JULY 13, 2015

Federal agencies are circumventing constitutional obligations by utilizing a secret fusion center where illegally obtained information is passed on to be used against American citizens.

All federal law enforcement agencies are teaching their agents how to fabricate evidence and commit perjury under oath if necessary in order to protect and conceal the illegal sources of their investigations.

Attorney Robert Bernhoft and Former IRS Special Agent Joe Banister tell you how this unprecedented case will affect you.

FLASHBACK: Check out Mr. Banister’s previous work appearing in, among others, the Alex Jones documentary Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Exposed.

THIS IS A MUST READ! AMERICA IS JUST AS CLOSE!

The End of Freedom of Speech in Spain

Martin Armstrong
July 13, 2015

Spain has shown that it is fully on board with the Brussels authoritarian direction of ending democracy. Those in power have simply convinced themselves that the people do not understand what is good for them so they must impose their will upon the people but raw force. How does this differ in any what from the justification of imposing communism? This is the death of all freedom and it is upon our doorstep.

Here are the new laws in Spain:

1. If you photograph security personnel and then share these images on social media: up to €30.000 fine (particularly if photo exposes violence used against a member of the public). This fine could increase depending on the number of Instagram or social media followers you have.

2. Tweet or retweet information or the “location of an organized protest” can now be interpreted as an act of terrorism as it incites others to “commit a crime” (now that “demonstrating” in many ways has become a crime). Sound “1984”-ish? Read about Orwell and his time in Spain.

3. Snowden-like whistle blowing is now defined as an act of terrorism. If you write for a local publication, be careful what you print, whom you speak to, and whether the government is listening.

4. Visiting or consulting terrorist websites – even for investigative purposes – can be interpreted as an act of terrorism. Make sure you use “Tor” browser, reject cookies, and don’t allow pop-ups. Not to mention, don’t post it on your Facebook timeline!

5. Be careful with the royal jokes! Any satirical comment against the royal family is a new crime “against the Crown”. For example, “What did Leticia and the Bishop have to say after they ––“ (SORRY CENSORED).

6. No more hassling elected members of the government or local authorities – even if they say one thing in order to be elected, but then go and do the exact opposite. Confronting them about this hypocritical behavior. Even if you see them in the street chatting to a street cleaner, dining at their favorite expensive restaurant, or having their shoes shined by that physics graduate who cannot find a decent job in the country, hassling them about their behavior is now a criminal offence.

7. Has your local river been so polluted by that plastic factory along the edge that all life has extinguished? Well, tough! Greenpeace or similar protests are now finable from €601–€30.000.

8. Protests in a spontaneous way outside Parliament are now illegal. For example if Parliament passes a hugely unpopular bill, or are debating something extremely important to you or your community, it is now finable from €601 – €30.000. Tip: Use Google Maps to protest just around the corner – but don’t tweet the location!

9. Obstructing an officer in the course of their business, “resisting arrest”, refusing to leave a demonstration when told, or getting in the way of a swinging baton are all now finable offences from €601 – €30.000.

10. Showing lack of respect to officers of the law is an immediate fine of €100 – €600. Answering back, asking a disrespectful question, making a funny face, showing your bottom to an officer of the law, or telling him/her that their breath reminds you of your dog’s underparts is now, sadly, not advisable.

11. Occupying, squatting, or refusing to leave an office, business, bank or other place until your complaint has been heard as a protest is now a €100 – €600 fine (no more flash mobs).

12. Digital protests: Writing something that could technically “disturb the peace” is a now a crime. Bloggers beware, for no one has yet defined whose peace you could be disturbing.

This article was posted: Monday, July 13, 2015 at 7:48 am

...And now you've heard it all - America is a Republic and not looking to remove capitalism or our inherent rights to live, work and prosper without being undermined or oppressed. ‪#‎SandersSillySocialism‬ - WAKE UP AMERICA!

BERNIE SANDERS: JESUS WAS A SOCIALIST

"I think Jesus was a socialist," he said

Bernie Sanders: Jesus Was a Socialist

by HOWARD KOPLOWITZ | AL.COM | JULY 13, 2015


In the 22 years that she’s been eligible to vote, Elizabeth Hewitt was never motivated to cast a ballot.

“I didn’t like either candidate. I didn’t care who won because I felt it didn’t matter,” Hewitt said.

But the 40-year-old Blount County resident is no longer apathetic about politics, now that independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is running for president. Hewitt said Sanders’ platform on income inequality persuaded her to get off the sidelines in 2016.

Hewitt was one of some 300 people who attended the first Alabama for Bernie Sanders meetup Sunday at Good People Brewing Company in Birmingham. The gathering was a way for Sanders supporters to organize and spread the word about the senators’ Democratic campaign for president.

Read More;

GREECE #THISISACOUP: BANKSTERS SEIZE SOVEREIGNTY & ASSETS

Greek finance leader said “Come & Take It” - in the spirit of capitulation, not defiance

by INFOWARS.COM | JULY 13, 2015


Last week the world was astounded when the Greek people refused to capitulate to economic blackmail and said in defiance, “Molon Labe”.

But this weekend, their leader, after 16 hours of closed meetings, said “Come & Take It” in the spirit of capitulation, not defiance.

Austerity measures including tax increases, pension cuts, even milk & bakery regulations will be made by the creditors, not Greece.

Creditors will seize 50 Billion Euros of Greek assets and infrastructure, placing them into a private investment fund for crony capitalists.

In a move that’s as symbolic as it is financial — Greek power generation will be among the assets seized.

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Wow! MO State Democratic Senator Posts ‘Bounty’ Online on Facebook Critics

 

Missouri State Senator and Democratic Leader Maria Chappelle-Nadal posted a bounty online for information on her online critic.

Via Dana Loesch Radio:
maria chappell nadal threat

KTVI reported:

Senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal a University City democrat says she was alerted to the comments Friday night found on a public page called Pro-Union St. Louis. She says the comments centered around her stand on the school transfer bill.

Chappelle-Nadal says some of the posts included racially charged comments and vulgarities aimed at her.

‘I wanted people to know who these individuals are,’ she said.

The comments, she says, were removed from the Pro-Union Facebook page, but not before she was able to trace back the identities of those making the nasty posts.

She says she went to the public versions of their Facebook pages and copied photos of them and posted them on her Twitter feed under the headline, ‘racist union members.’

Some of the photos also showed family members, including children.

Several Twitter users have been highly critical of that tactic, but the senator defends her actions.

In January Chappelle-Nadal threatened Missouri voters over their “white privilege.”

In 2013 Chappelle-Nadal proposed legislation to force parents to notify schools if the family owned a gun.

The post Wow! MO State Democratic Senator Posts ‘Bounty’ Online on Facebook Critics appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Wow! MO State Democratic Senator Posts ‘Bounty’ Online on Facebook Critics
Jim Hoft
Wed, 08 Jul 2015 01:12:35 GMT

The Facts That Gun Grabbers Can’t Wrap Their Minds Around

 

pistol shooting wikimedia

It seems like there are irreconcilable differences between those who are pro-Second Amendment, and those who advocate gun control, and I think it goes beyond their personal beliefs. They think about the world in fundamentally different ways, which becomes plainly obvious when you see how these two groups compile data on homicides and gun ownership. Let’s take a look at how anti-gun folks see these numbers:

Higher ownership of guns in the United States has been linked to more violent crimes and overall homicides, according to a new study by researchers at Harvard University.

I was intrigued when I first read that. I don’t think it would change my overall position on the rights of human beings if this were true, but I’d like to know if the statistics I give readers are true or not, so I decided to read more into this study.

Firearm assaults were 6.8 times more common in US states with the most guns versus states with the least, said study researcher Michael Monuteaux, an epidemiologist and professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School.

“We found no support for the hypothesis that owning more guns leads to a drop or a reduction in violent crime, instead, we found the opposite,” Monuteaux told Live Science.

“This study suggests that it’s really hard to find evidence that where there are more guns, there are less crimes, but you can easily find evidence that where there are a lot more guns, there are a lot more gun crimes,” he said.

Numerous studies have found that gun ownership is directly associated with gun-related homicides, and homicide by gun is the most common type of homicide in the United States.

Boston University researcher Michael Siegel and colleagues found in a 2013 study published in the American Journal of Public Health that over 30 years, gun ownership levels correlated with firearm homicides, such that the higher the gun ownership rate, the higher the firearm homicide rate.

Do you see what they did there? At first, the article was about gun ownership causing violent crime. Then it shifts back and forth between that, and claiming that more guns cause more gun related crimes. I swear the next time I hear the words “gun homicide” “gun crimes” or “firearm homicides” I’m gonna scream.

That’s because gun control advocates can always find plenty of statistics that show higher gun ownership rates correlate with gun related crimes. Obviously, if you live in a state or country with an easy access to firearms, there will be more crimes committed with firearms. Human beings always seek out the most effective tools for the job, so they will always spring for best weapons they can get a hold of, regardless of whether or not they are criminals or law-abiding citizens.

But gun control advocates have a tendency to ignore overall homicides, and instead focus on homicides that are caused by firearms. When you do that, you’re missing the bigger picture. You’ll always fail to recognize that, while more guns equal more gun related crimes, they may also cause the overall violent crime rate to go down, a fact which has been proven time and time again.

Now it’s true that the Harvard study did claim to find a relationship between more guns and a higher overall homicide rate. I decided to look for another article that had more details on the study, which I did find. The researchers behind the study admitted that while there did appear to be a connection between more guns and more crime, they weren’t sure which came first. Do guns cause more crime, or does a higher crime rate cause people to buy more guns?

This reminds me of another falsehood that gun controllers fall for over and over again. They love comparing the statistics of criminal homicides and justifiable homicides. Criminal homicides account for many more deaths than the former, so they conclude that guns are much more likely to be used by a criminal to kill, then they are to be used by a law-abiding citizen to protect themselves. But there’s a serious problem with that conclusion.

As many of us now know, police departments in America are famously bad at reporting the number of “justified” homicides their officers commit. And apparently, they’re even worse at reporting justified homicides committed by average Americans. These numbers also don’t account for how often someone uses a gun to protect themselves, which don’t result in injury or death. It’s a number we’ll probably never know for sure, since some people probably don’t even bother reporting these incidents to the police.

So the next time you read about any study that draws a conclusions between gun ownership, crime, and self-defense, always read between the lines and dig a little deeper. The truth is often elusive.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Joshua Krause of The Daily Sheeple.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

The Facts That Gun Grabbers Can’t Wrap Their Minds Around
Joshua Krause
Wed, 08 Jul 2015 01:08:16 GMT

Breaking: Gun Used By San Francisco Shooting Suspect BELONGED TO FEDERAL AGENT

 

The gun used by Mexican illegal alien Francisco Sanchez in San Francisco belonged to a federal agent.
Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez
Francisco Sanchez, 45, shot Kathryn Steinle, 32, last week in San Francisco.

FOX News reported:

The gun used by a Mexican illegal immigrant when he allegedly shot dead a 32-year-old woman at a San Francisco pier belonged to a federal agent, a source confirmed to Fox News Tuesday.

It was not immediately clear how Francisco Sanchez, 45, would have obtained the weapon. However, the San Francisco Chronicle reported sources told the paper the gun had been stolen during a car burglary in June.

Earlier Tuesday, Sanchez pled not guilty to first-degree murder in last week’s shooting of Kathryn Steinle, 32, while she was walking with her father and a family friend at Pier 14. Police said witnesses heard no argument or dispute before the shooting, suggesting it was a random attack.

Sanchez had previously told KGO-TV Sunday in a mix of Spanish and English that he found a gun wrapped inside a shirt while he was sitting on a bench at the pier and smoking a cigarette.

“So I picked it up and … it started to fire on its own,” Sanchez said, adding that he heard three shots go off.

A source familiar with the investigation told the San Francisco Chronicle that Sanchez said he was at the popular pier to shoot at sea lions, and discarded the firearm after realizing he had shot Steinle.

The post Breaking: Gun Used By San Francisco Shooting Suspect BELONGED TO FEDERAL AGENT appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Breaking: Gun Used By San Francisco Shooting Suspect BELONGED TO FEDERAL AGENT
Jim Hoft
Wed, 08 Jul 2015 02:24:56 GMT

SPREAD THIS: Former Judge Comes Forward With PROOF Hillary Is Guilty of Treason

Hillary’s secret war

Clinton approved arms for terrorist enemies of the United States

Hillary's Illegal War Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

Hillary’s Illegal War Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times more >

Washington Times

By Andrew P. Napolitano - - Wednesday, July 1, 2015

In the course of my work, I am often asked by colleagues to review and explain documents and statutes. Recently, in conjunction with my colleagues Catherine Herridge and Pamela Browne, I read the transcripts of an interview Ms. Browne did with a man named Marc Turi, and Ms. Herridge asked me to review emails to and from State Department and congressional officials during the years when Hillary Clinton was the secretary of state.

What I saw has persuaded me beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty that Mrs. Clinton provided material assistance to terrorists and lied to Congress in a venue where the law required her to be truthful. Here is the backstory.

Mr. Turi is a lawfully licensed American arms dealer. In 2011, he applied to the Departments of State and Treasury for approvals to sell arms to the government of Qatar. Qatar is a small Middle Eastern country whose government is so entwined with the U.S. government that it almost always will do what American government officials ask of it.

In its efforts to keep arms from countries and groups that might harm Americans and American interests, Congress has authorized the Departments of State and Treasury to be arms gatekeepers. They can declare a country or group to be a terrorist organization, in which case selling or facilitating the sale of arms to it is a felony. They also can license dealers to sell.

Mr. Turi sold hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of arms to the government of Qatar, which then, at the request of American government officials, were sold, bartered or given to rebel groups in Libya and Syria. Some of the groups that received the arms were on the U.S. terror list. Thus, the same State and Treasury Departments that licensed the sales also prohibited them.

How could that be?

That’s where Mrs. Clinton’s secret State Department and her secret war come in. Because Mrs. Clinton used her husband’s computer server for all of her email traffic while she was the secretary of state, a violation of three federal laws, few in the State Department outside her inner circle knew what she was up to.

Now we know.

She obtained permission from President Obama and consent from congressional leaders in both houses of Congress and in both parties to arm rebels in Syria and Libya in an effort to overthrow the governments of those countries.

Many of the rebels Mrs. Clinton armed, using the weapons lawfully sold to Qatar by Mr. Turi and others, were terrorist groups who are our sworn enemies. There was no congressional declaration of war, no congressional vote, no congressional knowledge beyond fewer than a dozen members, and no federal statute that authorized this.

When Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, asked Mrs. Clinton at a public hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Jan. 23, 2013, whether she knew about American arms shipped to the Middle East, to Turkey or to any other country, she denied any knowledge. It is unclear whether she was under oath at the time, but that is legally irrelevant. The obligation to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to Congress pertains to all witnesses who testify before congressional committees, whether an oath has been administered or not. (Just ask Roger Clemens, who was twice prosecuted for misleading Congress about the contents of his urine while not under oath. He was acquitted.)

Here is her relevant testimony:

Mr. Paul: My question is is the U.S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons buying, selling anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?

Mrs. Clinton: To Turkey? … I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody’s ever raised that with me. I, I .

Mr. Paul: It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that they may have weapons and what I’d like to know is the [Benghazi] annex that was close by . Were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons and were any of these weapons transferred to other countries any countries, Turkey included?

Mrs. Clinton: Senator, you will have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex. And I will see what information is available and ahhhh .

Mr. Paul: You are saying you don’t know .

Mrs. Clinton: I do not know. I don’t have any information on that.

At the time that Mrs. Clinton denied knowledge of the arms shipments, she and her State Department political designee, Andrew Shapiro, had authorized thousands of shipments of billions of dollars’ worth of arms to U.S. enemies to fight her secret war. Among the casualties of her war were U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three colleagues, who were assassinated at the American consulate in Benghazi, by rebels Mrs. Clinton armed with American military hardware in violation of American law.

This secret war and the criminal behavior that animated it was the product of conspirators in the White House, the State Department, the Treasury Department, the Justice Department, the CIA and a tight-knit group of members of Congress. Their conspiracy has now unraveled. Where is the outrage among the balance of Congress?

Hillary Clinton lied to Congress, gave arms to terrorists and destroyed her emails. How much longer can she hide the truth? How much longer can her lawlessness go unchallenged and unprosecuted? Does she really think the American voters will overlook her criminal behavior and put her in the White House where she can pardon herself?

Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is an analyst for the Fox News Channel. He has written seven books on the U.S. Constitution.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/1/andrew-napolitano-hillarys-secret-war/#ixzz3fF1uTuEy
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter