TiLTNews Network: Earth Watch

TiLTNews Network: Earth Watch - Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference, not by safety. It is easy to clamor for government security when terrible things happen; but liberty is given true meaning when we support it without exception, and we will be safer for it ~ Dr. Ron Paul

Share

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Salon Collectivist Plays Race Card on Waco Shoot-out

Racist collective guilt diatribe seriously at odds with reality

Salon Collectivist Plays Race Card on Waco Shoot-out

by Infowars.com | May 23, 2015

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter44Share on Google+0Email this to someonePrint this page


The liberal online magazine Salon is attempting to spin the Waco shootout along racial lines.

Mensah Demary, a black author living in Brooklyn, injects racial bias into the news story by demanding that “White people, take responsibility for your Waco thugs.”

Demary writes:

The white privilege of individuality afforded to the biker gangs—thugs—and their murderous shootout as an isolated incident, as a singular event or, perhaps, even one of many events confined to the gangs themselves, as opposed to the larger white American population, is ingrained in the American imagination, indeed perhaps around the world.

This sort of mindless collectivism permeates liberal activist discussion in the wake of Ferguson and Baltimore.

Instead of blaming individuals for what happened in Waco, Demary believes the incident is attributable to “the actions of your people” and is, once again, a symbol of “white privilege” that is an “impenetrable shield like a cocoon.”

Demary, however, is treading on thin ice. As noted in news stories, a number of the Bandidos are in fact Hispanic. Are the people of Mexico, largely Hispanic, to be collective blamed for what the Bandidos did as well? Even more damaging for Demary’s racist argument is the fact one of the arrested was a black man.

Of course, as the Trayvon Martin case revealed, reality will not be allowed to stand in the way of the racist agenda — although George Zimmerman was obviously Hispanic, the race activists and the corporate media insisted the case was an incident of white racism against a back man (who was portrayed as a child, yet another distortion of reality).

Because Mr. Demary is a collectivist and an opportunistic racist, he believes white Americans as a group, as a collective, as a tribe must be required to uniformly “denounce the gangs. Apologize. Repent for the actions of your people.”

For the collectivist, there are no individuals and individual behavior is always attributed to a particular social class, be that class the bourgeoisie or white people. The crimes of a few, in accordance with their skin color, are to be blamed on the whole.

In past collectivist societies, in China and the Soviet Union, for example, this sort of groupthink led to almost unimaginable cruelty, murder and genocide.

If it is allowed to take hold in America, a similar result will occur.

As Alex Jones and Infowars discovered earlier this week, collectivist mobs are capable of intolerance and violence toward their perceived enemies.

Receive The Underground Insider!

Posted by Earth Watch at 4:06 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Monday, May 25, 2015

US Treasury Bonds,The Godfather Of All Bubbles

Monday, May 4, 2015

Posted by Charleston Voice

Bond Market-01

Charles E Carlson

The 30-plus-year-old bull market in US bonds, notes and bills may well be the most destructive man-made “Bubble” in all of recorded history.  It will sooner or later implode because it is unsound to the core. A puncturing of the bubble may start when any of several huge holders sells. Its implosion will trigger the sale of other overpriced corporate, municipal and foreign bonds, and the dollar itself may well be replaced as the world reserve currency. The US bond bubble is the Godfather because it is so large that no other investment market can absorb the mass exodus which will come from it. It is logical that those who have worked so deliberately to create this debt bubble will fight even harder to prevent its collapse.  When it implodes, it will probably bring down lesser bubbles and excesses, including the function of the dollar as a world exchange currency. 

A true “Bubble” must result from a successful, planned deception

The handling of US Treasury bonds, notes and bills, (“US debt” hereafter) has all the elements that make it a once-in-a-lifetime bubble. It is much more than an overvalued investment or an idea that has become an exaggerated fad, like the “Dot Com Bubble”.   We have seen many of these come and go and we have survived each one. A bubble must have the element of planned deception in order to reach proportions monstrous enough to draw in the money of a large body of public to it.  US debt floats on the unreasonable assumption of inflated value.  It deliberately and falsely promotes itself in the face of reality. Charles Mackey, a Scottish journalist, first published Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1) in 1841, a study of ancient bubbles.  HIs most famous quote is, “Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.” The slow regaining of senses is why the bubble takes so long to burst, far beyond what seems reasonable.

image: http://whtt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Madoff.Bernie-07-300x177.jpg

Madoff.Bernie-07

The eventual loss suffered by Bernie Madoff’s investors was at least $18 billion.

“Bubbles” are always recognized by some (one by one) before they finally pop.  This was the case with the scheme of Bernard Madoff, now in prison for life. Madoff started his famous Ponzi scheme, once called Ascot Partners, which, like the US debt bubble, lasted over 30 years. Several discovered it much earlier and tried to expose Madoff, but no one would listen because of the deep deception Madoff had surrounded himself with.  Madoff even held volunteer positions in regulatory agencies that should have policed him but did not.  He was also designing computer programs to backdate imaginary trades in order to achieve desired results for his customers’ accounts. He made imaginary investments in real securities, but only on paper, and instead deposited the clients’ funds in his own discretionary account at Chase Bank. [Mechanics of the Madoff Bubble – (2)]

Madoff’s reported results exceeded all investment expectations, but investors were too satisfied to worry about it being too good to be true. Hedge funds, pension plans and mutual funds all invested with Madoff. His deception was simple: his fund always moved higher and never had a bad year!  This was a sure sign something was wrong, and one by one a few tried to expose him. 

The eventual loss suffered by Madoff’s investors was at least $18 billion, although those who got out early reaped gains at the expense of those who stayed in to the end!  Madoff admitted during his March 2009 guilty plea that the essence of his scheme was to deposit client money into a Chase account, rather than invest it.  When clients wanted their money, “I used the money in the Chase Manhattan bank account that belonged to them or other clients to pay the requested funds,” he told the court.

A True Bubble requires mass public participation

On April 19, 2015, Bloomberg News reported that public investors, seeking safety, “may sink $350 billion into debt funds globally this year, adding to the $3 trillion they’ve already poured into bonds since 2008.” (3-A) This influx is mostly through banks, mutual finds and managed IRAs. Per a 2015 article, “In U.S.debt auctions this year, bond mutual funds have bought a record 43 percent of newly issued Treasuries, allotment data compiled by Bloomberg show.” (3-A)

A bubble-creating deception may be an illegal one, like Madoff’s, or it may be a legitimized deception, such as the Federal Reserve System (FED), enacted by Congress 102 years ago. 

The measure of a bubble is not legality, but successful deception.  

The modern mutual fund business has learned how to prosper on US debt investments, considered in a previous era to be a dull and prosaic investment.  Mutual funds have added excitement to it by an implied promise of perpetual capital gains on top of meager income.  No word of capital loss potential is every mentioned.  We will detail one such example by fund manager, J P Morgan Chase Bank in this paper.

Bloomberg News further points out (3-A), “There are plenty of reasons to be bearish on U.S. government bonds. They pay almost nothing, the Federal Reserve wants to raise interest rates and money managers are largely convinced they’re [bonds] too expensive …[A] record 84 percent of professional investors in a Bank of America Corp. survey released this month said bonds were overvalued.” (3-B)

This writer agrees.  Treasury bonds are near the end of a 30 plus year bull market, a “Bubble” based on an unrealistic and  manipulated assumption that US Treasury bonds do or can be made to always sell higher and higher in the market place, translating into ever lower interest payments.  The Treasury keeps its hands clean by looking to the FED to manage the deception that keeps a line of willing lenders ready to loan money to the Treasury at higher and higher prices, (lower interest rates).

Three Deceptions that fire the US Debt Bubble

The Federal Reserve Bank of NY has its own style of deception, which varies slightly from Madoff’s and is about 1000 times larger.  It is the super-bank franchise dealer for US debt and claims to be the largest single holder of US debt.  But, unlike other buyers, the FED is allowed to purchase without investing capital, which explains why it is the biggest lender. The US debt bubble has been produced by three contrived deceptions.

First, dollars are electronically printed on the books of the FED whenever the Treasury sells US debt directly to the Federal Reserve Bank for its own account. The Treasury then spends these dollars by writing checks on its bank account at the FED.  The deception is that the FED does not put up anything of value to acquire this new US debt, rather it uses electronically created dollars that recently have been conceded to be, and are referred to as “printed” dollars.  Thus the illusion is created whenever needed, that demand is outstripping supply, and that there is a constant shortage of US bonds and notes.  Chase Manhattan Bank and Morgan Guarantee Bank were original major stockholders of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank (4), before they merged into the present J P Morgan Chase Bank.  Its money management division helps keep the US debt market creeping upward, as will be discussed later.

Second, after issuance, the market price for the newly issued US debt is manipulated, always upwardly, by the Open Market Committee of the FED.  It accomplishes this by making additional purchases in the open market, again with electronically printed dollars. The impact of all this new money on the US debt market produces smooth, little-controlled rises in the US debt’s market value year after year. Because the interest rate paid on US debt and each instrument’s market price are inversely related, Treasury bond interest is currently at a record low, meaning the market price of the debt is at a near all-time record high. This happens in spite of the clear fact that new debt is constantly being sold into the market, which should make the market go down, not up. As with Bernie Madoff’s hedge fund, the illusion is created that the market for US debt can go only one way: UP. Gradually this bubble becomes accepted as reality!  The madness of Charles Mackey’s crowd is achieved. During the course of this manipulation, according to its own report, the FED has accumulated $2.4 trillion in US debt, for which it paid nothing at all.

Third, value in US debt comes from “professional” managers of other people’s money (OPMM), who sell the specious notion that the open market value of US debt always rises enough to make up for the minuscule interest rate bonds and notes pay to the investor. OPMM keep on buying and trading US debt and are the largest holders by far! We must examine how this is accomplished in a real world of declining purchasing power for these bonds.  We will use as our example, the J P Morgan Chase Bank, whose two predecessor banks were original owners of the FED (4), and probably still are.  [Because the FED is unaudited, its present ownership is unknown to this author.]

As in the Madoff Ponzi bubble, manipulating parties, including the self-serving Congress, have contrived an UP, UP, and ever higher market for US debt that is hanging the least suspecting citizens out to dry. Consider that the Social Security Trust Fund is invested almost entirely in US debt and that, with similar US agency funds, such as the military pension plan, they hold about 1/3 of all federal debt issued.  What would happen to Social Security checks and health care payments if, say, 25% of their assets evaporated in just a few months?

The military-banking complex continues to provide the need for vast sales of US debt with its serial wars in the Middle East, which started in 1991.  US debt expansion also destroys the underpinnings of the US Dollar as the world reserve currency because there is no limit as to how much dollar currency there will be in circulation.  This practice of making war, then printing or borrowing the money to pay for it, is surprisingly similar to the British course of action that broke the back of its economy by 1914 and which forced it off the gold standard for good, and in 1931, the world turned away from the Pound Sterling  as a world reserve currency and opted instead for the Dollar.

The British Empire destroyed itself by borrowing for foreign wars it never lost

England set the standard for brutality in war in the 1895-1910 era when it invaded and destroyed two far away and very different lands. They moved into Sudan in 1898, followed closely by their invasion of South Africa in 1902. Both campaigns were covered by youthful reporter/adventurer Winston Churchill.

The war to conquer Sudan was unpopular in England, but the British War Department overcame public objections by fashioning a publicity campaign for revenge on Mahdi Muhammad Ahman  because a year earlier he had led an independence movement that captured the garrison at Khartoum and killed a popular British war hero, Charles Gordon. The war faction in Britain managed to sub-humanize the black Muslim Sudanese. 

English gentlemen have long been conditioned to accept the necessity for killing “wogs” going beck to Rudyard Kipling’s India.  

In the slaughter at Khartoum, it was British modern military supremacy against a primitively armed Sudanese independence movement. Propaganda-wise, the Sudanese had two ethnic strikes against them: they were both black and Muslim. The British Empire’s bloody success at Omdurman was recorded in a classic book by British author Alan Moorhead, The Blue Nile (1962).

England’s next war adventure was the invasion of South Africa in 1902, which in England turned out to be a very unpopular and expensive war. The Boer War was fought for control of South African gold mines.  It became the straw that broke the Empire.  

The Boers were white Europeans, and their casualties included some 40,000 Dutch wives and children of the Boer farmer-soldiers.  Under command of Herbert Kitchener first Earl, the wives and kids were gathered into British concentration camps and starved to death, to force the Boer farmers to yield to a treaty.  It worked.  Back home The British heard about this and could not stomach the facts. The detailed and painful account of this last British war for assets is told by Englishman Thomas Pakengham, in his classic, The Boer War (1979).

READ MORE

View article...

Related Posts

  • The Whole Story Of Zionist Conspiracy & How the US was Recruited as a pro-Zionist Ally by England - *video*
  • Israelis Killed more Palestinians Last Year than in any Year since 1967
  • Espionage, Treason, and the Congressional Fifth Column
  • The Communist Plan to Conquer America to be by Inciting Anarchy via Black Racism & Anti-Gentilism
  • Business Chiefs that Abhor Private Property

 

 

Read more at http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2015/05/us-treasury-bondsthe-godfather-of-all.html#t0zw2e1jIMMOc5WA.99

Posted by Earth Watch at 4:25 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

They brought wolves to Yellowstone, but they had no idea this would be the result.


Posted by Earth Watch at 4:06 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Sunday, May 24, 2015

Mothers are losing the ability to give birth naturally and breastfeed their babies claims leading doctor who blames rise of C-sections and use of drugs

 

  • Mothers have become too reliant on the drugs used in labour, said doctor
  • Dr Michel Odent claimed that this puts women's ability to give birth at risk
  • Fewer women are able to produce the hormone oxytocin, doctor added
  • This threatens ability to breastfeed and to give birth naturally, he said 

By Jennifer Smith for MailOnline

Published: 02:42 EST, 24 May 2015 | Updated: 11:56 EST, 24 May 2015

Dr Michel Odent said women's ability to give birth naturally is under threat 

Dr Michel Odent said women's ability to give birth naturally is under threat 

Mothers are losing the ability to give birth naturally and breastfeed because their bodies have become too reliant on drugs used during labour, a leading doctor has claimed.

Dr Michel Odent believes women are at risk of losing the hormones needed to deliver children because they have been supplied by doctors via drips for so long. 

The Frenchman, who championed the use of birth pools in hospitals, added that a lack of naturally produced hormones will also hinder breastfeeding.

Women are already enduring longer labours, with mothers giving birth between 2002 and 2008 taking on average two-and-a-half hours longer than those in the late 1950s.

In his new book Do We Need Midwives?, Dr Rodent said the research 'demonstrates that women are losing the ability to give birth.'

'That is the primary phenomenon... the number of women who give birth naturally is becoming insignificant,' he is reported as saying by The Sunday Times.

One of the major contributors to the decline is medical supply of the hormone oxytocin, he said.

The hormone is needed to go into labour and is also necessary when breastfeeding, with some in the past claiming it is the component which makes a mother fall in love with her child and bond with them from birth. 

But with an increasing number of women depending on drips and Caesarean sections, Dr Odent said women's ability to produce the hormone by themselves is under threat. 

'The human oxytocin system - the oxytocin, being the hormone of love, fundamental to birth and bonding, even in adulthood - is growing weaker. 

RELATED ARTICLES

  • Pictured is Lisa Bailey with her young son Kayden-Jay. See SWNS story SWBREAST; A furious mum is threatening to pull her kids from a primary school after she claims she was shamed by the head teacher ñ for BREASTFEEDING.  Angry mum-of-four Lisa Bailey wants to stand up for other parents and shame the school for denying her the right to feed her tot.  Lisa was at Langney Primary School to wave her 11-year-old daughter Abbie off on a week-long school trip when her son Kayden-Jay, one, became irritable and hungry.  She went to the back of the assembly hall of the Eastbourne, East Sussex, to ìdiscreetlyî feed her baby, just before school started on Monday morning.  But moments later, the school head Julie Prentice came over and told her to move on, in case any of the students became uncomfortable.  Stay at home mum Lisa, 32, of Eastbourne, said: ìThe head teacher kept looking over at me. She came and sat next to me and she said ëCan I move you to my officeí.  She was quite abrupt about itBreastfeeding mother's fury after headteacher 'asked her not...Mothers who have a C-section CAN give birth naturally the...

'The future of the human capacity to give birth is at risk,' Dr Odent added.

In the past he has come under fire to criticising the number of women who undergo Caesarean sections.

In 2006 Dr Odent controversially said the procedure stood in the way of mothers bonding with their babies in the same way as those who gave birth naturally. 

'What we can say for sure is that when a woman gives birth with a pre-labour Caesarean section she does not release this flow of love hormones, so she is a different woman than if she had given birth naturally and the first contact between mother and baby is different.' 

The doctor said vital hormones needed during childbirth and breastfeeding are becoming more difficult for women to produce naturally (file image)

The doctor said vital hormones needed during childbirth and breastfeeding are becoming more difficult for women to produce naturally (file image)

Other leading midwives and doctors have in the past said the rate of women undergoing the procedure is too high. 

In response NHS collected data in 2008, the Royal College of Midwives said the number was 'worryingly high.

'Women should be aware that a caesarean section is a major surgical procedure,' said general secretary designate, Cathy Warwick. 

'There is clear evidence that some caesarean sections are unnecessary and put women and babies at risk. 

'Coupled with this the birthrate is rising sharply, and midwife numbers are failing to keep pace, leaving them little time antenatally to discuss the birth and the available options with women.'  

What is involved in a caesarean section? Hear from the experts

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3094813/Mothers-losing-ability-birth-naturally-breastfeed-babies-claims-doctor-blames-rise-C-sections-use-drugs.html#ixzz3b6YSepB2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Posted by Earth Watch at 5:20 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Cops Who Flash Banged Infant’s Crib Blame the Baby

Truth Frequency Radio
May 22, 2015

2.bp.blogspot.com_2015-05-22_11-25-44By Joshua Krause

Nearly a year has passed since a Habersham County SWAT team stormed into the Phonesavanh residence, and very nearly killed their 19–month-old child. The no-knock raid was prompted by an anonymous tip which suggested there were drugs in the house. As the officers forced their way into the home, they lobbed a flash grenade which wound up landing in the crib where baby “bou-bou” was sleeping. As it erupted, the infant suffered severe burns and had to be taken to the hospital, and placed in a medically induced coma.

To any sane person, the sheriff’s department would be responsible for the damage inflicted on this child. Not only were there no drugs in the house, but the suspect they were looking for was found elsewhere. And despite their claims that they had the house under surveillance for two days prior to the raid, somehow they had no idea that there were children who lived there.

Still, the family had to fight the county tooth and nail to have their $1 million in medical bills reimbursed. Last month they settled with the county, and received $964,000, half of which will be given to them now, and the rest will be given to baby after he turns 18. While it’s great to hear that the family is getting something out of this, it’s shocking to see how defiant the sheriff’s department was, right to the very end. They never once admitted culpability for their gross negligence, and in a bizarre twist, their defense statement in court basically blamed the infant for his own injuries.

William Norman Grigg from the Pro Libertate blog read through the lengthy document, and sifted through the legalese for our benefit. It’s almost unbelievable how far the sheriff’s department was willing to go to avoid paying the family whose child they burned alive.

The act of sleeping in a room about to be breached by a SWAT team constituted “criminal” conduct on the part of the infant. At the very least, the infant was fully liable for the nearly fatal injuries inflicted on him when Habersham County Sheriff’s Deputy Charles Long blindly heaved a flash-bang grenade – a “destructive device,” as described by the ATF, that when detonated burns at 2,000-3,500 degrees Fahrenheit – into the crib.

Merely by being in that room, Bou-Bou had assumed the risk of coming under attack by a SWAT team. By impeding the trajectory of that grenade, rather than fleeing from his crib, Bou-Bou failed to “avoid the consequences” of that attack.

In any case, Bou-Bou, along with his parents and his siblings, are fully and exclusively to blame for the injuries that nearly killed the child and left the family with more than one million dollars in medical bills. The SWAT team that invaded the home in Cornelia, Georgia on the basis of a bogus anonymous tip that a $50 drug transaction had occurred there is legally blameless.

This is the defense presented by Haberham County Sheriff Joey Terrell and his comrades in their reply to a federal lawsuit filed last February on behalf of Bou-Bou Phonesavanh and his family.

Can you believe that? It gets much worse from here. When photographic evidence of the baby’s horrific injuries were shown in court, the defendants denied that the photograph “accurately depicts the injuries allegedly sustained.” The statement goes on to the blame the parents and the baby because the damages caused to the child were “directly and proximately caused by the contributory and comparative negligence of the plaintiffs and their failure to exercise ordinary care.”

And as a last-ditch effort to avoid paying the bill, the sheriff’s department invoked the principle of “laches,” which in the legal world, is a kind of use it or lose it statement. It basically means that you don’t have the right to sue, if you waited a long period of time in the hopes that future circumstances would favor your case. It doesn’t apply in this case at all because the family almost immediately filed a notice with the court after the incident.

The origins and usage of that obscure and archaic legal term do offer some insight about the way Bou-Bou’s would-be murderers see themselves, and their victim.

“Laches” is a term embodying the ancient legal maxim that “Equity favors the vigilant, and not those who have slumbered on their rights.” Defendants who appeal to this oft-cited and little-applied concept are accusing plaintiffs of subjecting them to a form of “legal ambush.”

What Sheriff Joey and his cornpone chekists are claiming, in effect, is that while he was sleeping, Baby Bou-Bou ambushed them.

How low can one police department go?

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

http://truthfrequencyradio.com/cops-who-flash-banged-infants-crib-blame-the-baby/

Posted by Earth Watch at 12:59 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Special Report: TPP Gives Obama Power To Destroy America

The TPP is global domination by a fascist cartel bent on enslaving the world

Prison Planet.com
May 23, 2015

In this exclusive emergency address, Alex breaks down the hidden reasons behind the sinister Trans Pacific Trade Partnership.

The TPP is global domination by a fascist cartel bent on enslaving the world. Now the Senate has given fast-track authority to Obama to implement this secret plan and set fire to our Constitution, rules of law and ultimately our liberty and way of life.

Kentucky Senator and presidential candidate Rand Paul was among a host of lawmakers who staunchly opposed the secrecy surrounding the Trans Pacific Partnership bill, saying he disagrees with the proposed legislation “being held under lock and key.”

“I’m hesitant to give blanket authority on stuff we haven’t seen,” Senator Paul said earlier this month.

Yesterday, Paul was one of only five republican senators that voted against the final “fast-track” bill, in a vote that passed 62-37.

“Fast-track would allow Obama to send the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal to Congress for an up-or-down vote” sans the ability to negotiate amendments, notes The Hill.

The TPA must still pass a House vote, which is why it’s imperative to contact your representatives and let them know you’re against H.R. 1314, the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) or fast-track bill, which essentially grants the office of the president the power to do treaty by Executive Order.

This article was posted: Saturday, May 23, 2015 at 1:14 pm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/special-report-tpp-gives-obama-power-to-destroy-america.html

Posted by Earth Watch at 4:04 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Federal Court Rules Pro-Life Views are ‘Patently Offensive’

Daily Caller News Foundation

Federal Court Rules Pro-Life Views Are ‘Patently Offensive’

Photo of Blake Neff

Blake Neff Reporter

10:17 PM 05/22/2015

Federal Court Rules Pro-Life Views are 'Patently Offensive'

A new decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals holds that New York’s state government has the right to ban “Choose Life” license plates on the grounds that such a statement is “patently offensive.”

The dispute stems from a now-suspended program offered by New York’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) which allowed private organizations to create custom license plates. If drivers purchased the plates, the purchasing price was split between the DMV and the non-profit.

The Children First Foundation (CFF), an organization promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, submitted a design for a “Choose Life” license plate, which featured a drawing of two children’s faces in front of a yellow sun.

The proposed plate was rejected, with the DMV citing a policy that allows it to ban “patently offensive” plates in order to prevent incidents of road rage. The “patently offensive” category in U.S. speech is typically related to public obscenity laws, and allows for limitations on things like the public display of pornography or other materials that blatantly violate community standards.

Later, during the lawsuit, the DMV claimed it was simply carrying out a general ban on plates concerning politically divisive topics, since government-issued license plates could be perceived as government-sponsored speech. However, in the past the DMV has approved pro-union and pro-environmental plates.

Judge Rosemary Pooler, a Clinton appointee, agreed with New York’s position in her majority opinion. She took this view even though she also ruled that license plates are private speech subject to First Amendment protections. Despite these protections, however, she said that so many New Yorkers could find a plate advocating an anti-abortion position “patently offensive” that the DMV was justified in suppressing the speech.

Pooler also said that simple alternatives existed for drivers who wished to express opposition to abortion.

“[Drivers] may display a ‘Choose Life’ bumper sticker — or even cover every available square inch of their vehicle with such stickers,” Pooler wrote. “That message will resonate just as loudly as if vehicle displayed a ‘Choose Life’ license plate. It will merely do so without the perception of State endorsement.”

The decision overturned the ruling of a lower court from 2011, which held that blocking the plates was an illegal First Amendment violation.

In a strong dissent, Judge Debra Ann Livingston said the court was essentially granting the New York DMV the right to suppress any viewpoints it did not like.

The case has been worming its way through the courts for an exceptionally long time. The original Choose Life plate was rejected in 2002, and CFF’s lawsuit was filed in 2004. Even Friday’s ruling was in response to oral arguments that were first made in 2012. Friday’s ruling may not be the last, either. The Alliance Defending Freedom, a public interest law firm representing CFF, has said it is reviewing its legal options in the wake of the ruling,

Follow Blake on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/federal-court-rules-pro-life-views-are-patently-offensive/

Posted by Earth Watch at 11:34 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

How Monsanto Stops GMO Labeling Through Deception

Pro-GMO groups backed by Monsanto are already playing dirty

How Monsanto Stops GMO Labeling Through Deception

From the New York Times to Reuters and the Washington Post, all of the major publications agree: the general public is in full support of GMO labeling initiatives.

Quite simply, they want to know what they’re giving to both themselves and their family. Time and time again, we see poll results demonstrating that more than 90% of the US population is in favor of  GMO labeling. Yet time and time again, we see GMO labeling initiatives shot down across the country.

Are all of the major polling organizations in the country simply using incorrect statistical algorithms? Obviously, the answer instead lies in the dirty tricks (and even the mainstream media is now calling them out as such) used by mega biotech companies like Monsanto. In tandem with corporate food producers, these tricks are used to shove disinformation into the minds of voters who otherwise would fully support the concept of GMO labeling.

Specifically, we’re talking about pro-GMO lobby groups faking quotes from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that ‘support GMOs’ in the face of labeling initiatives, and even groups falsely claiming that Stanford is on the side of Monsanto amid the labeling debate (when they aren’t and haven’t even commented on the issue).

But before we get into these dirty geurilla tactics and their use in the informational war over GMOs, let’s really look at the truly overwhelming support for GMO labeling in this country based upon the estimates of major polling groups.

The New York Times: 93% found to be in support of labeling GMOs

MSNBC: 96% in support

Reuters/NPR: 93% in support of full labeling

Washington Post: 95% in support of full labeling

Consumer Reports: 95% agree GM animals should be labeled

ABC News: 93% want federal GM labeling mandate

So with these stats being reported virtually unanimously, what could Monsanto possibly be doing to sway voters outside of blatantly manipulating the actual polling results? As it turns out, and as we wrote about back in 2012, Monsanto has actually been caught not only misusing an FDA logo — but blatantly fabricating an FDA quote in order to suppress California’s notorious Prop 37 GMO labeling bill. From the report back in November of 2012:

fda-monsanto-prop-37

“Misuse of a United States government seal can lead to a $250,000 fine, twenty years in prison, and three years of supervised release — unless you’re a campaign organization funded by major corporations like Monsanto. In a move completely ignored by the mainstream media (many of which have financial ties to such corporations), the anti-GMO labeling No on 37 Committee paid for and disseminated a physical piece of direct mail that not only entirely misused the FDA logo but even sported a fabricated quote.

A quote that even the FDA has stated on record that was never stated. That is because it would actually be illegal to do so. You see federal agencies cannot take a stance on Proposition 37, which means that the Monsanto-funded No on 37 campaign literally created the quote and FDA support out of thin air. In other words, the organization leaders blatantly violated 8 U.S.C. §§ 506 and 1017 by misusing the FDA seal and writing a quote out of thin air to support their political campaign to keep Monsanto rolling in the billions.”

And that’s only a portion of what was needed to crush California’s highly anticipated GMO labeling bill. As Huffington Post points out, much more was also discovered:

“They used the Stanford logo in TV ads and mailers, when the University also did not take a stand on the issue. And they said that Henry I. Miller, their hired gun, is a professor at Stanford when in reality, he works for the Hoover Institution — which rents office space on the campus.

They paid a PR firm with expertise in fighting recycling legislation (on behalf of the soda pop industry) to generate a misleading “study” that was designed to show the proposition raising food prices by hundreds of dollars per state resident per year.

They said there have never been any documented ill-effects from GMO consumption. But many allege that 37 direct human deaths and 1,500 disabilities linked to a toxic batch of the supplement Tryptophan were caused by a genetically engineered strain of bacteria used in production. And there are numerous reports oflivestock that have died as a result of grazing on GMO cotton.”

Outside of deeply manipulating vote counts, pro-GMO groups backed by Monsanto are already playing dirty and spreading what amounts to complete misinformation into the public spotlight. And they’re doing it with millions in funding. Checkout the details of who exactly is pumping cash into efforts to defeat your ability to know what you’re eating:

Monsanto – $7,100,500
DuPont – $4,900,000
Pepsi – $2,145,400
Bayer – $2,000,000
Dow – $2,000,000
BASF – $2,000,000
Syngenta – $2,000,000
Kraft Foods – $1,950,000
Coca-Cola – $1,455,500
Nestle – $1,315,600
General Mills – $1,135,000
ConAgra – $1,077,000
Kellogg’s – $790,000
Smithfield – $684,000

And here’s a list of companies that have supported Prop 37:

Mercola.com – $1,115,000
Nature’s Path – $610,000
Dr. Bronner’s – $369,000
Lundberg – $251,000
Udis/EarthBalance/Glutino – $102,000
Clif Bar- $100,000
Organic Valley – $100,000
Amy’s – $100,000
Annie’s – $50,000
Nutiva – $50,000
Frey Vineyards – $35,000

Anthony Gucciardi is a natural health & self-development speaker, writer, and author. His writings have appeared in #1 selling books and top 100 websites.

Posted by Earth Watch at 11:13 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Friday, May 22, 2015

Video: Man Holds Carjacker at Gunpoint Until Cops Arrive

“You picked the wrong mother fu*ker to try to rob today”

Adan Salazar
Prison Planet.com
May 22, 2015

An outrageous cell phone video captured in Georgia features an armed man turning the tables on a carjacker, holding him at gunpoint until police arrive.

Hashim Fannin, a resident of an Atlanta suburb, walked out of a Family Dollar store yesterday to find an unfamiliar person inside his vehicle.

hashim-carjacker

“I asked him to get out the car, probably not in those exact words,” Fannin told WSB-TV News.

Fannin proceeded to draw his pistol and ordered the would-be carjacker, 61-year-old Edgar Horn, on to the pavement.

horn-carjacker1

“I told him, “No, there’s no leaving, leaving was before you hopped into my car … at this point there is not leaving,’” Fannin said.

“Just stay there and wait for the police,” the armed man can be heard telling Horn in the video.

“Thought you were just gonna take my shit,” Fannin tells the man lying face down on the ground. “You picked the wrong mother fucker to try to rob today.”

Fannin is seen placing his gun on a nearby curb just as officers arrive on the scene, indicating to them he is not a threat.

officer-thank1

One officer walks over to Fannin and shakes his hand, thanking him for protecting the community.

“Honestly, I look at it like this. That is one less guy I got to worry about bothering my mom when she’s out grocery shopping,” Fannin said.

In Georgia, both concealed and open carry of a handgun is permitted with a valid Georgia Weapons Carry License.

This article was posted: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 12:03 pm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/video-man-holds-carjacker-at-gunpoint-until-cops-arrive.html

Posted by Earth Watch at 12:48 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

40 Percent Honeybee Die Off In One Year

Posted by Earth Watch at 12:42 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )

Pages

  • Home
  • Human Events with Jack Posobeic

TiLTNews Archive

Search This Blog

Bannons War Room

Loading...

Warroom Live Transcripts

Make America Great Again

Make America Great Again

Blog Archive

The Whitehouse Live

https://www.whitehouse.gov/live/

News – The White House

Loading...

Presidential Actions – The White House

Loading...

President Trump Gives a Presidential Address to the Nation August 21, 2017

Today America Turned An Irreversible Corner

BREAKING: President Donald Trump Delivers an URGENT Message of Unity and Equality 1/15/18

Alex Jones Show

Total Pageviews

Theme images by enot-poloskun. Powered by Blogger.