Share

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Montana Court Suspends Judge Who Said High School Freshman Was 'In Control' of Teacher Rape

 

The Montana judge who drew national condemnation for saying a 14-year-old rape victim was asking for it will be suspended without pay for one month. District Judge Todd Baugh had said in court that the victim—who later killed herself—was just as much to blame as her attacker, whom he sentenced to serve a mere 31 days in jail. 

Her attacker, by the way, was her 47-year-old public school teacher, Stacey Dean Rambold, and he admitted to "sexual intercourse without consent." But to Baugh, the victim was "a troubled youth" who looked "older than her chronological age," and this wasn't the "beat-up rape" variety—which meant the freshman girl entrusted to this man's care "was probably as much in control of the situation" as he was. 

The state's judicial ethics panel filed a complaint against Baugh, asking the Montana Supreme Court to publicly reprimand him. But the court took it a step further: In a decision Wednesday, it ordered Baugh—who is retiring at the end of the year—to be suspended from the bench withiout pay for his last month.

"There is no place in the Montana judiciary for perpetuating the stereotype that women and girls are responsible for sexual crimes committed against them," it stated.

In April, the court vacated Rambold's original sentence and remanded for resentencing by a new judge. On Tuesday, it denied his request to reconsider the ruling. 

 

Montana Court Suspends Judge Who Said High School Freshman Was 'In Control' of Teacher Rape
Elizabeth Nolan Brown
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:31:00 GMT

Did the Bowe Bergdahl Story Get Michael Hastings Killed? You betcha it did! This diligent and honorable reporter uncovered this story before it was a story! The government kills journalists (our 4th Branch of government) on a regular basis so Americans won’t know the real truth! #EndDCCorruption

Did the Bowe Bergdahl Story Get Michael Hastings Killed?

Posted on June 5, 2014 by Dean Garrison

michael hastings crash

There have many credible reports, from those who were in Afghanistan, that stated clearly that fellow soldiers were under orders of silence in reference to the desertion of Bowe Bergdahl. That is somewhat understandable. However…

If a reporter was able to reach out to those same troops, and get them to break that silence, would that be enough to get that reporter killed?

On June 7, 2012 Michael Hastings had a piece published in Rolling Stone titled America’s Last Prisoner of War. This was not a fluff piece. It was hard-hitting journalism that was the trademark of Michael Hastings’ reporting. Even back in 2012 Hastings was reporting that Bowe was a deserter and a lot of the stories you have been hearing and reading over the last week stemmed from that ground-breaking account. He was ahead of his time and effectively blew the lid off this story long before it was a story. Here is a brief excerpt from the article, although I would encourage you to read it in full.

The next day, American forces had a chance to free Bowe. The battalionoperations officer, call sign GERONIMO 3, met with two tribal elders from the nearby village. The elders had been asked by the Taliban to arrange atrade with U.S. forces. The insurgents wanted 15 of their jailed fighters released, along with an unidentified sum of money, in exchange for Bowe. The officer hedged, unwilling or unable to make such a bargain, and no deal was struck. Instead, the Army ordered all units stationed in the eastern half of Afghanistan – known as RC East, in military jargon – to join the search for Bowe.

On July 4th, the search effort got a break: Bowe was spotted in a village in Ghazni, about 15 miles across the mountains to the west. He was wearing khaki, with a bag covering his head, and he was being driven in a blackToyota Corolla, escorted by three to five motorcycles. But by the time troops arrived to investigate, it was too late. That was the last time that Bowe would be seen until the first propaganda video, released later that month.

Michael Hastings got Bowe Bergdahl’s fellow soldiers to speak upon conditions of anonymity while disobeying the “gag orders” of their superiors.

Many in the alternative media community believe that Michael Hastings did not simply die in a car accident on June 18, 2013. They believe that accident was the result of sabotage. However, the prevalent theory has been that, if he was targeted it must have had something to do with the NSA. Tim Brown reported back in August of 2013:

Ironically, Hastings had sent the following email to close friends just hours before his death:

“Subject: FBI Investigation, re: NSA -Hey (redacted names) — the Feds are interviewing my “close friends and associates.” Perhaps if the authorities arrive “BuzzFeed GQ,” er HQ, may be wise to immediately request legal counsel before any conversations or interviews about our news gathering practices or related journalism issues. Also: I’m onto a big story, and need to go off the rada[r] for a bit.

Some have speculated that Hastings’ car was booby trapped due to the numerous explosions. Former counter-terror czar Richard Clarke reacted to the news by telling the Huffington Post that the fatal crash was “consistent with a car cyber attack.”

Even if the FBI was investigating Hastings over his NSA reporting, that was not their only investigation into Michael Hastings. Yesterday Eric Barlow, reporting for wearechange.org, brought to light a scarcely known FBI document that was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request:

At the time of the story’s publication, the media had all but forgotten about Bergdahl — who was released on Saturday after five years in the hands of the Taliban, in exchange for five Guantanamo prisoners. And, with the exception of some initial chatter, Hastings’ piece, which paints a deeply unflattering picture of Bergdahl’s unit and its leadership, hardly had the impact of some of his other investigations.

But someone did pay attention to it: the FBI.

That, at least, is what was revealed in a heavily redacted document released by the agency following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request — filed on the day of Hastings’ death — by investigative journalist Jason Leopold and Ryan Shapiro, an MIT doctoral student whom the Justice Department once called the “most prolific” requester of FOIA documents.

For the FBI to launch an investigation into a Rolling Stone article about a military deserter would seem to open up a whole line of potential questions, but it can be simplified with just one.

Why?

These are the things that conspiracy theories are made of. Would this story have been enough to get Michael Hastings silenced permanently? Was it more of a case of Hastings whole body of work?

We will likely never know the answer to these questions and some will say it’s a stretch to even ask them. But you do not get to the truth without asking tough questions. My personal opinion is that this would only be enough if there was something larger that the government was trying to hide. For instance, and I am not stating these as facts, maybe Bergdahl worked for the CIA or maybe he really was working with The Taliban.

The original FBI report has been partially unredacted because of legal challenges. If you would like to read the report, you can see it at www.documentscloud.org

Whether the story of Bowe Bergdahl would have been enough to get Michael Hastings killed is certainly debatable. But you can not deny that he was way ahead of everyone else on this story as with many other stories.

This is the same guy who ended the career of General Stanley McChrystal.

In the current political climate I doubt nothing and am surprised by nothing. Could Michael Hastings have been killed by our government to shut him up?

If you don’t believe that is possible then you simply have not been paying attention. Our government doesn’t like real investigative reporters who expose the truth. They prefer thelap-dog media that simply follows the “talking points” and narratives they are given.

Did the Bowe Bergdahl Story Get Michael Hastings Killed?
Dean Garrison
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:27:10 GMT

California county votes to secede from the state

California county votes to secede from the state

Posted on June 5, 2014 by RT.com

Tehama County California

Residents of a northern California county on Tuesday voted in favor of a measure that will now force local officials to consider a plan to secede from the state and form a new entity named Jefferson.

That decision — one of three related matters being considered by voters across the Golden State on Tuesday this week — passed by 55.74 percent in Tehama County, with nearly 1,000 more ballots cast towards seceding from California compared to staying.

Elsewhere in the state, however, secessionist efforts in northern California largely failed this week when voters in two of three counties where the issue was up for debate voted against formally beginning the process to separate and start a new state.

Voters in Del Norte County voted Tuesday to reject a secessionist measure on ballots there that would have required local officials to begin examining the prospect of separating from California and forming a new state with the residents of other nearby counties. The measure was rejected by 59 percent.

In Tehama County, however, voters there cast their ballots in favor of an identical measure, passing the initiative by nearly 56 percent. Should the decision still stand afterthe final votes are tallied, then the Tehama County Board of Supervisors will have to adopt a Declaration of Support — purely an advisory measure — concerning the creation of a proposed State of Jefferson and separation from California.

“The vote is not binding, but serves merely to help the County gauge public support for the proposed separation from the State of California and formation of a new state,” according to the fine print on Tuesday’s questionnaire. “The Tehama County Board of Supervisors may take whatever action it desires, or no action, regardless of the vote.”

“My position is that I want to know the will of the people. And that is what I will follow, that is what I will do,” Supervisor Sandy Bruce said ahead of this week’s vote in Tehama.

Combined, the populations of Del Norte and Tehama counties account for only 91,000 — a statistic that allows residents scant representation with regards to picking elected officials to argue on their behalf in both the state capital and Washington. This has left many of the Californians favoring secession with feeling disenfranchised and has helped to fuel the fire of the secessionist movement in the northern part of the state.

Following weeks of anticipation, however, Tuesday’s elections across California yielded only a partial victory for the local secessionist movement. A third matter up for debate in Siskiyou County which would have renamed the area the Republic of Jefferson — a precursor to the possible “state” of Jefferson still in the works — garnered only 44 percent of the vote.

“I’m going to definitely talk to the people of Jefferson and tell them to stick around,” California Gov. Jerry Brown told reporters outside his residence in the capital city, Sacramento, Tuesday night, the Associated Press reported.

But Mark Baird, a proponent of the creation of Jefferson state, told the AP that secessionists aren’t easily giving up.

“There are people who are going to want this and there are people who won’t, but we aren’t ever going to quit until we get representation in rural Northern California,” the Siskiyou County resident said.

More counties in the region are expected to vote on related measures in the coming weeks. All told, the residents of 16 counties have established plans to help pave the way for the creation of Jefferson state, which would contain around 467,000 residents and be roughlythe size of New Hampshire and Vermont combined.

Lindsay France discusses the results with RT’s Meghan Lopez in Los Angeles.

Courtesy of RT.com

California county votes to secede from the state
RT.com
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:00:20 GMT

California county votes to secede from the state

California county votes to secede from the state

Posted on June 5, 2014 by RT.com

Tehama County California

Residents of a northern California county on Tuesday voted in favor of a measure that will now force local officials to consider a plan to secede from the state and form a new entity named Jefferson.

That decision — one of three related matters being considered by voters across the Golden State on Tuesday this week — passed by 55.74 percent in Tehama County, with nearly 1,000 more ballots cast towards seceding from California compared to staying.

Elsewhere in the state, however, secessionist efforts in northern California largely failed this week when voters in two of three counties where the issue was up for debate voted against formally beginning the process to separate and start a new state.

Voters in Del Norte County voted Tuesday to reject a secessionist measure on ballots there that would have required local officials to begin examining the prospect of separating from California and forming a new state with the residents of other nearby counties. The measure was rejected by 59 percent.

In Tehama County, however, voters there cast their ballots in favor of an identical measure, passing the initiative by nearly 56 percent. Should the decision still stand afterthe final votes are tallied, then the Tehama County Board of Supervisors will have to adopt a Declaration of Support — purely an advisory measure — concerning the creation of a proposed State of Jefferson and separation from California.

“The vote is not binding, but serves merely to help the County gauge public support for the proposed separation from the State of California and formation of a new state,” according to the fine print on Tuesday’s questionnaire. “The Tehama County Board of Supervisors may take whatever action it desires, or no action, regardless of the vote.”

“My position is that I want to know the will of the people. And that is what I will follow, that is what I will do,” Supervisor Sandy Bruce said ahead of this week’s vote in Tehama.

Combined, the populations of Del Norte and Tehama counties account for only 91,000 — a statistic that allows residents scant representation with regards to picking elected officials to argue on their behalf in both the state capital and Washington. This has left many of the Californians favoring secession with feeling disenfranchised and has helped to fuel the fire of the secessionist movement in the northern part of the state.

Following weeks of anticipation, however, Tuesday’s elections across California yielded only a partial victory for the local secessionist movement. A third matter up for debate in Siskiyou County which would have renamed the area the Republic of Jefferson — a precursor to the possible “state” of Jefferson still in the works — garnered only 44 percent of the vote.

“I’m going to definitely talk to the people of Jefferson and tell them to stick around,” California Gov. Jerry Brown told reporters outside his residence in the capital city, Sacramento, Tuesday night, the Associated Press reported.

But Mark Baird, a proponent of the creation of Jefferson state, told the AP that secessionists aren’t easily giving up.

“There are people who are going to want this and there are people who won’t, but we aren’t ever going to quit until we get representation in rural Northern California,” the Siskiyou County resident said.

More counties in the region are expected to vote on related measures in the coming weeks. All told, the residents of 16 counties have established plans to help pave the way for the creation of Jefferson state, which would contain around 467,000 residents and be roughlythe size of New Hampshire and Vermont combined.

Lindsay France discusses the results with RT’s Meghan Lopez in Los Angeles.

Courtesy of RT.com

California county votes to secede from the state
RT.com
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:00:20 GMT

DHS Renews Non-deportation Policy For Dreamers

In this March 18, 2014, file photo, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson speaks during a news conference in Washington. Johnson, who's conducting a politically charged review of the nation's deportation policy, said Thursday, May 15 he's looking at making changes to a much-criticized program that runs people booked for local crimes through a federal immigration database.(AP Photo/ Evan Vucci, File)

The Obama administration announced Thursday that it will renew the non-deportation for young adult illegal immigrants, meaning the more than 560,000 so-called “Dreamers” who are part of the program will be allowed to continue living and working in the U.S. with no fear of deportations.

“Despite the acrimony and partisanship that now exists in Washington, almost all of us agree that a child who crossed our border illegally with a parent, or in search of a parent or a better life, was not making an adult choice to break our laws, and should be treated differently than adult law-breakers,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said in announcing the program’s renewal for another two years.

Lauded by immigrant-rights groups as a humanitarian gesture, the program, which the government termed Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, has been wildly popular with Hispanic voters, and polls show it receives generally good remarks with the public at large.

Critics, however, call it President Obama’s “mini-amnesty” and say it is contributing to a new surge in illegal immigration — including driving up the number of young children crossing the border alone. Homeland Security officials have termed that a crisis.

Those on both sides view DACA as a trial run for a broader legalization program — whether done by executive action or by law, if Congress can agree on something.

To qualify, immigrants had to have been in the U.S. before age 16, had to have been 30 or younger as of June 15, 2012, and had to prove some degree of educational attainment. Applicants were also put through a background check to try to weed out those with serious criminal charges on their record.

More than 96 percent of those who have gone through the DACA process have been approved, which some analysts say shows how little screening is done. The program’s backers, though, say that shows just how prepared and deserving this population is.

Under the program, when Dreamers encounter authorities they can show papers proving they are not going to be deported.

The program faces a legal challenge. A group of immigration agents has sued to halt the program and other non-deportation directives, arguing they are required by law to arrest illegal immigrants they encounter.

A federal judge in Texas ruled that the agents were likely correct — but also ruled that the case was beyond his jurisdiction. The agents have appealed.

Mr. Obama announced the program in June 2012, in the middle of his re-election campaign, as he was struggling to maintain support among Hispanic voters.

Mr. Obama envisioned the program lasting for two years, but left open the possibility that it could be renewed.

The first applications were filed in August 2012, were approved a month later, and will begin to expire later this year.

In addition to the more than 560,000 applications that have been approved, nearly 70,000 more remain in the pipeline, according to the latest statistics from the end of March.

Heading into this year’s congressional elections, many Democrats have pleaded with Mr. Obama to expand the program to include illegal immigrant parents of Dreamers.

“The Obama Administration should build on this program’s successes and expand DACA to include our parents and others who remain targets for deportation,” said Cristina Jimenez, managing director of United We Dream. “As we celebrate the futures that Dreamers now enjoy through DACA, we will keep fighting until our entire families can share in the opportunities that come through a just and humane immigration policy.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/5/dhs-renews-non-deportation-policy-dreamers/#ixzz33mtuBOMK
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

DHS Renews Non-deportation Policy For Dreamers
Adan
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:04:24 GMT

Monarch Butterfly Decline Linked To Spread Of GM Crops

Monarch butterfly decline linked to spread of GM crops

Milkweed essential to monarchs in decline because of herbicides used with genetically modified crops

By Emily Chung, CBC News Posted: Jun 04, 2014 7:00 PM ET Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 1:31 PM ET

Tyler Flockhart, currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Guelph, led the analysis, which combined all the known data about monarch populations and the factors that influence them.

Tyler Flockhart, currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Guelph, led the analysis, which combined all the known data about monarch populations and the factors that influence them. (Courtesy Tyler Flockhart)

The main cause of the monarch butterfly's decline is the loss of milkweed — its food — in its U.S. breeding grounds, a new study has found. That all but confirms that the spread of genetically modified crops is indirectly killing the monarch.

This past winter, the number of monarch butterflies wintering in Mexico fell to its lowest since 1993, when records first started being kept, the World Wildlife Fund and Mexico's Environment Department reported in January. That report blamed the loss of milkweed owing to genetically modified crops and urban sprawl in the U.S. and illegal logging in the butterflies' Mexican wintering ground.

Now, an analysis combining all the known data about monarch populations and the factors that influence them shows that the monarch's biggest threat is in the U.S., not Mexico.

The leaves of the milkweed plant are the only place that monarchs lay their eggs and the only food that monarch butterfly caterpillars will eat. A large proportion of monarchs east of the Rocky Mountains breed in the U.S. corn belt, stretching from Kansas in the west to Ohio in the east, and south to north from Missouri to North Dakota.

20% decline in milkweed

The new study led by Tyler Flockhart, currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Guelph, showed that the number of milkweed plants in the U.S. corn belt, where most monarchs breed, has fallen 20 per cent over the past few decades.

"It's a massive number of milkweeds — about 1.5 billion milkweed plants," he said.

MONARCH TAGGING

This past winter, monarch butterfly numbers at the wintering grounds in Mexico fell to their lowest levels since records started being kept in 1993. (Associated Press)

The study, published today in the Journal of Animal Ecology, shows this decline in milkweed is the main cause of the monarch's recent population decline, not deforestation in Mexico. If this milkweed loss continues, the study predicts, monarch populations will fall at least another 14 per cent and there is a five per cent chance they will be driven nearly to extinction over the next century .

Study co-author Ryan Norris, a biology professor at the University of Guelph, said that "likely the biggest cause of loss of milkweed is the adoption of genetically modified crops."

Farmers have been increasingly planting corn and soybeans resistant to herbicides, and then applying those herbicides liberally on their fields. That kills off plants between the rows of crops that aren't resistant, such as milkweed.

That's been a big problem for the butterflies. Even now, 67 per cent of milkweed plants in the butterflies' breeding grounds are found in "agriculture-intensive landscapes," the study reported.

There have also been some other causes of milkweed loss, Norris said. Because milkweed is poisonous to humans and to grazing animals, it's considered a noxious weed in many jurisdictions and is removed as such. Some open areas where milkweed has previously grown have also been reforested in recent decades, wiping out the milkweed. Flockhart added that urbanization has also played a role.

Milkweed is also being lost in other parts of the monarch butterfly's range, such as southern Ontario. But Flockhart said that has less of an effect because so few monarch butterflies breed there, and most of those that do come from farther south.

The findings suggest that the "top conservation priority to slow or halt future population declines of monarch butterflies in North America," has to be addressing the milkweed loss in its breeding grounds, the paper said.

"One of the main focus areas has to be planting milkweed in the U.S. Midwest," Norris said.

Thus far, he added, most monarch conservation efforts have focused on protecting the butterflies' wintering site in Mexico, where millions of monarchs from all over North America converge each year. But recently, that hasn't stopped monarch populations from declining.

"Here's the lesson for any species that crosses international boundaries or any species that moves long distances over the course of its annual cycle," he said. "You can't focus on one part of the annual cycle."

Roadside planting recommended

Flockhart said the study shows that a huge quantity of milkweed would need to be replanted in order for monarch butterfly populations to recover. He suggests taking advantage of roadsides for this purpose, and mowing the milkweed at strategic times to maximize their use by monarch butterflies, which prefer younger plants.

Flockhart also wants the plant delisted as a noxious weed in areas where monarchs breed. In Ontario, milkweed was delisted on May 9.

The study represented several years of work over the course of Flockhart's PhD studies at the University of Guelph. Flockhart designed the study and brought together all the data he could find about monarch butterflies, including information about their range and survival rates at various points in their life cycle. The researchers also tracked monarchs using chemical markers to learn more about their movements.

The data was compiled into a computer model built by Jean-Baptiste Pichancourt at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Brisbane, Australia, in collaboration with University of Queensland researcher Tara Martin. That allowed the researchers to see what would happen to monarch populations when they manipulated different variables. It was funded by NSERC, the Canadian Wildlife Federation, the University of Guelph and CSIRO.

Monarch Butterfly Decline Linked To Spread Of GM Crops
Adan
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:32:42 GMT

Brazil Readies 'RoboCop' Riot Squads for World Cup Protests

 

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Brazil Readies 'RoboCop' Riot Squads for World Cup Protests
jon
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:26:05 GMT

'Walmart Moms' Strike Rejects Retailer's Family-Friendly Claims

 

Walmart moms protest at the Walmart shareholders meeting in Bentonville, Arkansas (Photo: Making Change at Walmart)Under the banner of "Walmart moms," mothers who work at Walmart launched strikes in 20 cities across the United States on Wednesday to protest what say are poverty wages and routine policies of retaliation against workers who organize.</P< p>

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

'Walmart Moms' Strike Rejects Retailer's Family-Friendly Claims
Sarah Lazare
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:34:47 GMT

ALL TOO COMMON ANYMORE: Family Calls 911 For Help With Special Needs Daughter, Cops Show Up And Shoot Her Dead

FAMILY CALLS 911 FOR HELP WITH SPECIAL NEEDS DAUGHTER, COPS SHOW UP AND SHOOT HER DEAD
Neighbors claim girl was shot in the back

Family Calls 911 For Help With Special Needs Daughter, Cops Show Up And Shoot Her Dead

by STEVE WATSON | INFOWARS.COM | JUNE 5, 2014


A family in California has been left reeling after their special needs daughter was shot dead by police following a 911 call for emergency medical assistance.

The San Mateo County sheriff’s department says that 18-year-old Yanira Serrano, who suffered from depression, was fatally shot Tuesday in Half Moon Bay after she lunged at a deputy with a knife.

The Sheriff’s department claims that they received a call regarding a violent armed woman in the street and were responding accordingly.

“There was a confrontation where the deputy was in fear for his life and as a result he fired his weapon.” Deputy Rebecca Rosenblatt told local news station KNTV, adding that the incident occurred within 20 seconds of arriving to the scene.

“We have deputies that were responding to the scene with the information that somebody was acting in a psychotic nature armed with a knife and won’t put it down even for her own family,” Rosenblatt added.

However, the girl’s brother, Tiny Serrano, told reporters that it was the family who called 911 requesting paramedics because his sister had not taken her medication.

“Instead they decided to send a deputy to the house,” he said.

<script type="text/javascript" charset="UTF-8" src="http://www.nbcbayarea.com/portableplayer/?cmsID=261931441&videoID=q1GAkqOfeB_D&origin=nbcbayarea.com&sec=news&subsec=local&width=600&height=360"></script>

The brother noted that Serrano would have never posed a threat to a law enformcement officer, and was only carrying a knife out of fear when she fled her home.

A ktvu report notes that neighbors suggested to reporters that Serrano was shot in the back by the deputy. The Sheriff’s department denies the allegation, but would not say where the teen was shot. They are also unaware whether or not the deputy ordered Serrano to drop the knife.

A cousin, Saul Miramontes, told KTVU that the family is devastated.

“I just feel kind of sad. I feel mad. I don’t know why an officer would come and do that and try to kill my cousin,” said Miramontes. “My cousin didn’t do nothing. For sure they could have Tasered her. They could have at least done something better.”

“She has special needs and we just want answers,” the girl’s brother urged. “Who are we supposed to call now when we need help when who is supposed to help us is killing our kids?”

“We want answers. Why didn’t they use a Taser?” he asked. “We just want to know what really happened.”

“She was really loving and caring, really sweet with my parents,” he said. “I still can’t believe this happened to my sister.”

A vigil held for Serrano last night turned into a protest march that ended at the San Mateo County sheriff’s sub-station.

The deputy who killed Serrano has been placed on paid administrative leave pending an investigation.

——————————

Family Calls 911 For Help With Special Needs Daughter, Cops Show Up And Shoot Her Dead
steve_watson
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:43:45 GMT

Hemp: The New Industrial Revolution

HEMP: THE NEW INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
Antiquated US laws keep Americans from realizing the industrial benefits of hemp

Hemp: The New Industrial Revolution

by INFOWARS.COM | JUNE 5, 2014


The leader of the Global Hemp Initiative discusses the versatile uses of hemp in today’s industrial manufacturing.

Eric Pollitt of GlobalHemp.com explains the antiquated laws that prevent the US from growing hemp for industrial use, leaving Europe to be the leading hemp importer.

Hemp: The New Industrial Revolution
Adan
Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:30:43 GMT