Share

Saturday, May 31, 2014

Some stories are so sick and so big that Big Brother will kill to cover them up |

Some stories are so sick and so big that Big Brother will kill to cover them up |

Some stories are so sick and so big that Big Brother will kill to cover them up



I couldn’t sleep last night.
I am scared for myself and my family. I feel like I am being dragged into something that is a real danger to us.
I reflected and prayed and came to the decision that I will do what is right and trust in God to protect us. I am sure a lot of people will laugh at me and say this is just another one of those “conspiracies” from D.C. Clothesline.
I can’t do anything to change the minds of those who can’t see how corrupt and evil things have become. All I can do is tell you that my gut is twisted in knots and I don’t know what to do. I want to run and I want to hide.
At the same time I think what it would feel like if I were Dave or Monika now.
Who are Dave and Monika?
Dave is Dave Hodges. He is an associate of mine and the host of The Common Sense Show. He allows me to reprint his blog articles. He is a good man. His passion in life is to get to the bottom of stories and he did just that a couple of weeks ago when he blew the lid off of a scandal so big that it put him in danger. Dave found evidence that Child Protective Services has been used as an arm of vengeance, from the powers that be, and is now engaging in child sex trafficking.
Monika is a State Department employee that has lost her son Dylan, allegedly because she is on the wrong side politically. Dylan is currently being sexually abused in a home with twogay men. You won’t likely read this story in very many places, because it is one of those stories that is just simply too big. It is one of those stories that gets people killed.
This is like IRS targeting on steroids.
Monika emailed me yesterday. I had no previous contact with her. She was Dave’s “source.” I didn’t know her but she looked me up because she was concerned. Here is that email…
Dean,
Thank you for passing the stories along that Dave Hodges wrote about Dylan and I. DFS has started attempts to silence me and intimidate me. I am scared for my son’s and my safety. My power went out in myapartment for a whole night and day, thus causing mysurveillance cameras to be powered off, while I was not home. No one in my entire apartment building lost power, just me. Dave’s website just went down, none of the stories work. Can you please ask people onyour webpage to please re-post the stories all over the web. I have a feeling “someone” is taking down all links and stories pertaining to Dave Hodges, Mary Tyndall, and myself.
Thanks -
Monika Wesolowski
xxxxxxx@gmail.com
xxxxxxx@gmail.com
P.S.
Should “anything” happen to me (would NOT be of my own doing) please circulate information about DFS/CPS corruption and child sex trafficking, and please share my story of how CPS stole my son and is trafficking him out to homosexual pedophiles.
I am very slow to answer emails lately. There just aren’t enough hours in the day. I happened to see hers about 7 hours after she sent it. I exchanged a couple of more emails with Monika and she told me that Dave has taken his site down and is laying low for a few days. Apparently he has received threats toward his family. I also told her that I would do something to try to raise some more awareness for her this weekend. That is what I am trying to do now.
I don’t ask this often but I would ask for anyone who cares to please share this article far and wide. This story has to come to light somehow. The mainstream media sites and sources will not pick this story up because of their agendas. Some of the larger alternative sites were talking to Dave the last time I was updated, but to my knowledge they had not released this story yet. I know that WND.com was one of the sites Dave mentioned. Other sites are likely scared of getting involved in this. For anyone who remembers the Franklin Credit Union Child Trafficking Scandal, you will realize that these stories can result in a lot of untimely deaths for investigators and witnesses.
This is not my story and I do not know all of the details. So I am simply going to reprint what Dave previously wrote and hope that it somehow gains traction. I am putting my belief in the Patriotic people of this country to make this story be heard. Please remember that you are the new media and you can not be silent. There are some very frightened people that are counting on us. We can’t keep looking the other way. We can not keep letting these people get by with these heinous acts.


Illinois and Virginia CPS’ Conspire to Steal and Sex Traffic Children



Image Source: www.orphanjusticecenter.com
When holding on to sensitive information, I have found it prudent to go public as I believe it gives the greatest chance of not becoming a statistic such as BreitbartHastingsClancy and appropriately in this case, Nancy Schaefer. Subsequently, I am publishing notice of the fact that the state of Virginia Child Protective Services is sex-trafficking in children that it illegally seizes and that the Illinois Child Protective Services is cooperating with Virginia in order to complete  a child abduction with sex-trafficking connections.

Obamacare and Child Abduction

Nearly three weeks ago, I wrote an investigative article which exposed a massive conspiracy designed to separate parents from their children and an obscure element ofObamacare would subsequently give the government complete control over your children.
In the article, it was documented that  Human, Health and Services (HHS)  and their state level emissary, Children Protective Services (CPS) are engaged in a conspiracy which will culminate in (1) the Agenda 21 designed breakdown of the family; (2) the eradication of any semblance of parental authority over children; and, (3) unbridled and unfettered access to seizing children from the home in unlimited quantities for whatever nefarious purposes (e.g. child sex trafficking) which might dictate the volume of child seizures.
Based upon the emails and comments the article generated, it became clear that most people saw the threat to American children as being real. However, there were the typical allegations of fear mongering and falsifying facts and conclusions by the programmedsheeple in this country who would have everyone believe that there is no such thing as a conspiracy in which two, or more, bad people would ever jointly plan to do something nefarious. Well, it did not take more than 24 hours after publishing the article for me to receive notification of a case that would parallel the hysteria I was promoting in the April 29, 2014 article.
The case, in question, involves a single mom, Monika Wesolowski, who just happens to be a State Department employee with a security clearance.  I am vaguely aware that some of her work involves ambassadors and the White House. Please note that if Wesolowski can be targeted by the new Obamacare “child protection” guidelines, given her lofty federalemployee status, then we should conclude that no parent and no child is safe from the evil intentions of this administration and some of its sex trafficking minions.
With absolute certainty, it can be stated that the Virginia Child Protective Services and its partner, the Department of Family Services, along with the Illinois Child ProtectiveServices are conspiring to steal children and sex traffic these same kids

A Quick Review of Obamacare “Child Protection” Provisions

This unprecedented program mandates a partnership between various United Nations organizations and ICF, acting on behalf of HHS, CPS and Obamacare (i.e. The Affordable Health Care Act). The evidence demonstrates that Obamacare is representative of the fact that our families are living in a Hitler Youth Movement hellish nightmare in which the stateowns and can seize your children for whatever reason and purpose they deem appropriate.
After reviewing HHS, CPS and UN documents, what is being presently reported in the alternative media is merely the tip of the iceberg with regard to HHS’ intentions toward the ultimate outcome of the children in this country. After reviewing the documents, there is no doubt that Obama is representing international interests which will seek to remove as many children as possible from the homes of their parents in the spirit of the Hitler Youth Movement.
In the 110 page HHS/CPS manual, written by the UN think tank group ICF, on behalf of HHS, now serves as the field manual for CPS child snatching operations. The new “variables” which comprise child neglect, worthy of government intervention is frightening beyond any words I can find to express their undisguised intentions.
Under the HHS/CPS policy manual, they label any “grounding” of a child as neglect by isolation. There are no time frames set forth which constitutes isolation and it is left to the field representative. This obviously erodes parental discipline.
If your child is judged to be underachieving in school, this is referred to as educational neglect and is worthy of governmental intervention. Further, if your child is absent for five days in any one month from school, the same allegation would be made against the parent.
If your child has ADD or ADHD, you could be accused of neglect because the document details how this can be somehow caused by poor nutrition, although the variables associated with the cause are not specified.
Of course, no Obama inspired program would be complete without an attack upon the Second Amendment. Obamacare is no exception as one of the criteria for child neglect  are parents who are also gun owners.
I am sure that now some of the sheeple remember this referenced  article where provided detailed documentation on how Obamacare allowed for CPS to steal children for nefarious purposes. They said it just was not true. Unfortunately, it is true and I now have a shining example of this horrendous program in action.

Monika Wesolowski and Son Dylan

The father of Monika Wesolowski and the grandfather of Dylan sent Monika the article described above to his daughter. This prompted an introductory email sent by Ms. Wesolowski to myself.  After reading Monika’s email, I had flashbacks to the Stacy Lynne case that I have been working on since December of 2011, when Stacey’s son, Jaden, was stolen by a Judge Julie Kunce Field who was a former consultant to the IMF and World Bank. Stacy’s was not accused of committing any crime except for publicly opposing the Agenda 21 policies in her hometown of Ft. Collins, Colorado. For her public advocacy, she now has no contact with her son and has no idea where the boy is living.
Wesolowski is guilty of even less that Stacy Lynne, who was guilty of nothing. She is guilty of being a conservative working in an ultra liberal environment. She has an NRA bumper sticker on her car, he screen saver promotes conservative causes and she is not personally and morally on board with the “gay” and “green” agenda that has come to dominate every federal administration under the most liberal President in American history. Wesolowski does believe that she has been targeted because of Catholic based, conservative views. She has been audited by the IRS and “randomly drug tested” by her employer. Before you dismiss these occurrences as random events, keep in mind that the enforcement agent for the new snatch and grab policies of Obamacare is the IRS and that this President has beenexposed for using the IRS to harass Tea Party members and uncooperative members of the mainstream media.

Wesolowski Makes Contact

On April 30, 2014, I received a lengthy email from Monika Wesolowski who detailed how her son Dylan was stolen from her home without any legitimate provocation.
On 4/30/2014 11:07 AM, Monika Wesolowski wrote:
Dave,
I read your article in the RBN about how HHS is taking away children through means of CPS. This happened to me in December of 2013, the night before my son turned five years old. He is on the spectrum of Autism with PDD, sensory processing, and behavioral disorders. He is in special education. Our lives were turned upside in a matter of hours. I had no idea prior that this would happen. They came in SWAT gear to my home, with CPS arriving over an hour later. The ordeal lasted from 8:30pm to past 11pm. I did not let them in my home, and in this way they classified me as a danger. They claimed I choked my son 2 days prior and therefore he was in imminent danger of life and that they were taking him away. I never hurt my son. It was the first sign of a skin condition, eczema patches, that my son started having. He had one small round one on the back of his neck. This is what they used against me. They did not take him to a doctor but ruled on hearsay. Once in temporary custody of my neighbors, we immediately took my son to the pediatrician, who claimed there was no injury and no bruising. (EDITOR’S NOTE: I HAVE THE PEDIATRICIAN’S REPORT AND THE APPEARANCE OF A RASH WAS SUBSTANTIATED, NOT BRUISING FROM SOME MYTHICAL ATTACK). She stated my son had a skin condition and provided medication. CPS was very angry that we took him to the doctor. They used the doctor’s report against me saying I coerced the doctor and that I was trying to use the medication as a cover. I was never arrested or criminally charges, rather my son was taken based off hearsay and Civil Court Order, an Emergency Removal. Once in court, the judge refused to incorporate any medical records. By this time my son was in a foster home of two gay men. I am Roman Catholic and have been very opposed to the foster home. By the time this went to court, there were two medical records as my son was taken to the pediatrician while in foster care and given medication for a second eczema (dermatitis) rash. He has had a few of these rashes since the ordeal started. 
My son was kidnapped by CPS in order to traffic him into foster care. He is in a home of two gay dads. I don’t know what to do. I live in Fairfax County, Virginia, which is now exploding with more cases such as mine. I am having a hard time getting a lawyer, no one wants to oppose the system. People are afraid. They have now accused my son’s daycare of child abuse. The daycare testified on my behalf in court, so they are now accusing the daycare of abusing my son and pulling out his hair, leaving bald marks, and putting poop in his face. I know this is all false also. When they removed my son from my home, they took him out of the daycare too, so these were new charges, even though he was no longer attending. They are trying to scare everyone around me.
I am a good mother, and my son has developmental disabilities. This was used to interrogate and coerce my son, and kidnap him. The father started this mess when he lost custody and all appeals, I had won sole legal custody. Two months later they were taking my son away and the ex now had the chance to modify custody. He added false claims of abuse and has been working with CPS and DFS (Dept. of Family Services) to keep our son in foster care.
I need help or advice. Can you put my story out for people to see? Can you help me expose this more, or maybe let me know if you know of anyone that can help?
Kind Regards,
Monika Wesolowski
Falls Church, VA
Monika went to court to try and get her son removed from CPS custody. She took the pediatrician’s report as well as the CPS psychological investigation which stated that Monika posed no threat to her son and the fact that the boy had not been injured. Amazingly, the judge would not allow the evidence to be entered into testimony leaving with the conundrum of this being her word vs. the word of CPS.
Monika has sent me the following in a later email:
Attached are also the pediatrician records I tried to use in court, with sworn affidavits. The 12/9/13 is the evaluation to prove I did not injure my son. The full CPS report is attached too. It’s full lies and fabrication, they refused to also use my maiden name despite that I was divorced at this point. They also listed me as Hispanic in one section in order to justify their funding.…
Speaking of funding, All CPS organizations receive $ 5,000 for each child taken from the home and that money is paid by HHS. If the child and mother are minorities, the funding stipend increases, hence the Hispanic designation.
Many of these new wards of the state simply disappear and are never heard from again as was the case in Oklahoma. This is the kind of case that got former Georgia State Senator Nancy Schaefer killed for daring to expose the criminal connection between CPS and child sex trafficking done by organizations like DynCorps and HSBC Bank.
Child sex trafficking is big business and the business is run like a Mafia organization which eliminates with extreme prejudice those persons who would expose the practice. As an aside, I am all too cognizant of the fact who and what I am dealing with. Therefore, I have distributed the Wesolowski “proof” of these claims to trusted sources for all the obvious reasons. This article also represents a kind of insurance policy as well.

Monika Wesolowski Can Prove What She Claims

Rather than placing Dylan with family and close friends as a foster care arrangement, CPS has opted to place the boy with two gay men. This is where the situation becomes very concerning. Gay rights advocates can relax, I am not going to discuss the wisdom of such a custody arrangement. Rather, I am going to expose reported criminal activity of two men who have no CPS oversight with regard to their parenting of Dylan.
As result of Monika’s visitations with Dylan, she has made some frightening discoveries. Dylan has “marks” in sensitive areas consistent with sexual abuse. The information is graphic and I am trying to determine the best method to release this photographic evidence. In addition, Dylan has regressed to defecating in his pants. He has unexplained fits of temper where he talks about cutting off his hands and the hands of others. Think sexually, this boy is describing the mechanics of sexual abuse.  As some readers know, I am a former mental health counselor. If this case was taking place in my state of Arizona, I would be compelled to report these facts to the authorities or face going to jail.
Here is another excerpt of an email that Monika sent me with graphic evidence.
These are the photos I sent to my new attorney concerning my son’s abuse & neglect, and fear or sexual abuse.
His dermatitis rashes are on his back and shoulder and have been there for at least several weeks, are getting worse. My son is skinnier and has lost weight since in the foster. He last yelled repeatedly that he wants to cut his hands off over and over and over prior to the bath….

Why the Delay In Reporting This Case?

Up until this point, I have been publicly silent on this issue because I was hopeful that Monika and Dylan would be reunited and I did not want to muddy the waters. CPS laid out a set of conditions that Monika had to follow if she was going to get her son back. She has fulfilled all of the unwarranted mandates that CPS laid out in order to get her son back. However, CPS/DFS is delaying the reunification until December of 2014. As I have discovered if this case gets dragged out for 12 months, CPS can take the child and no report requirement with regard to status has to be made to the original parent. This mother has no chance of getting her son back.
I delayed in reporting this case because Monika had a meeting, yesterday, with the Virginia Department of Family Services. I was hoping against all odds that she would get her child back and I did not want to antagonize the authorities. The following email description summarizes Monika’s meeting with DFS.
Ok. Met with DFS, all they are trying to do is damage control. I called the police, it’s a county over and their process is I have to talk to an officer first and only then it can go higher. I am saving brief clips of proof along with photos and dates, and going tomorrow during the morning as I have a feeling it will take half the day, and during the day. They won’t let me speak to a detective until I have enough proof, so I’m compiling!
But yes, I will talk on your show. Send me details of exact date, time, and number.
Monika Wesolowski

Virginia and Illinois Are Conspiring to Steal Dylan From His Mother

On May 15, 2014, I received a very disturbing email from Monika which described the following collusion between the Virginia and Illinois CPS with regard to her son’s case.
On 5/15/2014 8:20 PM, Monika Wesolowski wrote:
I just found out from my mom that the department of family services in IL tried to get my parents to sign a statement that I did something to hurt Dylan, and they wouldn’t. So when they signed their name saying I was innocent and that they support me and are on my side, IL said that VA won’t like that, and that my parents have no chance of getting Dylan since they are on my side. My mom is positive their plan is to adopt my son out into foster and no one in the family will have him. They are positive I need to make this all public. She believes DFS has NO intention of giving me my son back, despite what they tell me. I agree. I will try tomorrow, but I’m 99% sure we need to expose this and I need to file a Police report. (EDITOR’S NOTE: I HAD ADVISED MONIKA TO FILE A SEXUAL ABUSE REPORT AGAINST THE TWO GAY FOSTER PARENTS WITH HER LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE THAT SHE HAD SENT ME).
Monika Wesolowski
I responded with the following show announcement:
On May 16, 2014, at 3:05 AM, Dave Hodges <davehodges@thecommonsenseshow.com> wrote:
I am booking you on my show for 2.5 hours from 930pm-midnight, Central, on May 25, 2014.  I am going to invite your contact from the organization you told me about. She called but I have been swamped and will catch up with her on Friday or Saturday.
Dave

Dot Connecting

Remember the organizational pyramid I laid out earlier in the article. Obamacare is in charge of all child welfare. The IRS is the enforcement mechanism. HHS and resulting child services is operating under the previously documented UN created document on taking children from parents. HHS is now the de facto parent organization for CPS. Therefore, it makes perfect sense that Illinois, where Monika’s parents live, would cooperate with Virginia’s CPS in getting Dylan away from Monika’s entire family to fulfill their immoral mandate.

Conclusion

This practice is a globalist practice given the fact that the operating procedures come from the UN. Does anyone still believe that anyone can acquiesce and coexist with any New World Order Agenda?
I will be providing updates on this most regrettable case in the near future.
Dave Hodges is the Editor and Host of The Common Sense Show.
###End of Original Article###
Again, I am asking people to share this and help get the word out.
I am also asking you to pray for all involved.
I have young children and I really did not want to get involved, for obvious reasons. But someone has to speak for the woman who has already lost her child, and for the man who is in fear for his family’s safety because of exposing the story. Someone has to speak for the frightened young child who has been away from his mother for too long.
Please do whatever you can to help. Somehow we must all find the courage to do whatever it takes to purge this country of the sickness which has overtaken it.
-Dean Garrison, Publisher of The D.C. Clothesline

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Paranoia: Bilderberg Security Blocks Out Hotel Windows, Erects Police State Apparatus


PARANOIA: BILDERBERG SECURITY BLOCKS OUT HOTEL WINDOWS, ERECTS POLICE STATE APPARATUS
Curious journalists kept at bay via reflective window film, steel fencing

Paranoia: Bilderberg Security Blocks Out Hotel Windows, Erects Police State Apparatus

by INFOWARS.COM | MAY 28, 2014

 


Bilderberg minions are using taxpayer funds to erect fences and steel and concrete barricades in efforts to keep what happens at Bilderberg inside the Marriott Hotel in Copenhagen.

Infowars reporters are on-site to document the over-the-top paranoid reaction greeting journalists who dare venture to Denmark to report on what the real power brokers are scheming behind closed doors.

In the video below, one security officer can be seen putting an extra layer of reflective coating ona window to prevent curious onlookers from peering in.

View image on Twitter

Reporters also spotted bomb-sniffing dogs patrolling the location, another indication the powerful individuals meeting within the hotel fear public scrutiny.

View image on Twitter

When our reporters got a little too close for security’s comfort, they were escorted off the premises by security staff, utterly oblivious of their roles as grooms of the stool.

View image on Twitter

Stay tuned for more. Infowars reporters are on the ground in Copenhagen all week to cover Bilderberg 2014.

Watch: Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson break down what has happened during past Bilderbergs and what they expect to happen during this present one.

EU Commission Rejects Petition to Stop Funding Killing Human Embryos Despite 2 Million Signatures

EU Commission Rejects Petition to Stop Funding Killing Human Embryos Despite 2 Million Signatures

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/28/14 11:13 AM

Today the former “Barroso Commission”vetoed the One of Us Citizens’ Initiative to stop funding research on human embryos despite the petition getting two million signatures.

The pro-life petition was the largest petition in the history of European Institutions and sponsors say it is the largest petition in European history. It demands that Brussels no longer finances any practice that destroys human life before birth. The European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) is a participative democracy mechanism created by the Treaty of Lisbon through which a million citizens can take the initiative of introducing a legislative proposal in the European institutions

europeanunion

Gregor Puppinck told LifeNews he was disappointed by the decision.

“The ONE OF US Committee expresses its deep disappointment towards a deaf Commission which today makes a decision contrary to ethical and democratic requirements,” he said.

Puppinck added: “While each initiative draft is controlledupstream by the Commission before being open to signature, the Barroso Commission claims to possess the right of veto downstream, against initiatives having yet successfully obtained the required popular support.Such veto power is illegitimate and anti-democratic since politically, it is the European Legislature that may give a verdict on the content of the Initiative, and not the Commission, otherwise, the ECI mechanism would be meaningless.”

He continued:

An Unjustified VETO which does not even take the purpose of the request into account: The Commission’s response is hypocritical and disdainful as it pretends to not understand the purpose of the demand and comprises of thirty pages of self satisfaction of its own policy. The Commission wishes to continue financing non ethical and outdated biotechnological practices, as well as abortion in developing countries including countries where this is prohibited bycriminal law

An Unjustifiable VETO which flouts the democratic procedure: The Commission, rather than noticing the Initiative’s success and transmitting it to the European Parliament and Council of Europe has abused its power of formal control to exercise a judgement on the political opportunity of “One of Us” and to block this procedure. The Commission is therefore trying to defend a privilege of initiative, being the only institution able to initiate legal procedures up upon the creation of the ECI mechanism. The Commission therefore made this mechanism a travesty while the deputies, on the contrary, wanted it to be a real instrument of participative democracy.  The Commission thus testifies to the absence of a democratic culture.

For the “ONE OF US” Citizens’ Committee, the procedure is not over: on one hand, theCommission’s decision is likely to be appealed before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg – which acknowledges respect for human life from conception – and on the other hand, the new Parliament will audition the next Commission, allowing it to replace the respect of the Citizens’ Initiative in the heart of debates, and asks European Institutions to be more ethical and democratic.

Is It The Bilderberg Conference – Or Conspiracy?

Is it the Bilderberg conference – or conspiracy?

The world’s most powerful people begin their annual meeting on Thursday. So what have they got to hide?

TOM HARPER Author Biography

INVESTIGATIONS REPORTER

Wednesday 28 May 2014

Conspiracy theorists may chuckle when they learn a debate entitled “Does Privacy Exist?” is to feature at this year’s Bilderberg conference, the notoriously secretive gathering of the world’s most powerful bankers, politicians and business people.

There may be a further shaking of heads when they discover one of the participants at the heavily fortified, five-star Marriott Hotel in Copenhagen, Denmark, will be Keith Alexander, the former director of the National Security Agency (NSA), which was embarrassed by the mass-surveillance revelations leaked by Edward Snowden. In fairness to the Bilderberg, the organisers of this year’s conference – which starts on Thursday – have made efforts to be more transparent by publishing a list of all the prime ministers, chief executives and military chiefs in attendance, as well as the topics up for discussion.

Chancellor George Osborne and his Labour counterpart, Ed Balls, are among the hand-picked group of British politicians who will visit Copenhagen to hob-nob with the global elite behind closed doors.

Other guests from the political sphere include the former “Third Man” of New Labour, Lord Mandelson, the current International Development Secretary, Justine Greening, and the veteran American foreign policy expert, Henry Kissinger.

Billionaire captains of industry who landed invitations include the heads of Shell, BP, Airbus, HSBC, Saab, AXA, Google, and Linkedin. They will sit alongside key global powerbrokers such as Christine Lagarde, the head of the International Monetary Fund, and senior officials from the European Central Bank.

The chairmen from Goldman Sachs and Lazards will perhaps reflect on how their investment banks “advised” Whitehall over the controversial flotation of Royal Mail, which left the UK taxpayer £1bn out of pocket.

Keeping a discreet eye over the exchanges will be the intelligence chiefs such as Mr Alexander from the United States and Sir John Sawers, the head of MI6, who was pictured on Facebook in his swimming trunks in 2009.

Items on the agenda include “The future of democracy and the middle-class trap”, “The new architecture of the Middle East” and the major geopolitical crisis of the moment: “Ukraine”. The secretive nature of the Bilderberg Conference has triggered suspicions that the event is used to shape global policy at the expense of democratic oversight. The idea of the euro was said to have been spawned at one meeting in the Nineties.

Paul Flynn, Labour MP for Newport West, asked a series of parliamentary questions about Bilderberg last year when the conference was held at a five-star hotel near Watford. He told The Independent: “I don’t regard the Bilderberg as a great threat but we would all like to know what is going on with these things. Secrecy inspires concern.”

Despite its new efforts at transparency, the conference is still acutely sensitive about radical infiltration. On Tuesday night, three journalists – self-styled “InfoWarriors” – were arrested by Danish police after they tried to ambush the organisers outside the Marriott.

Unfortunately for Hannah Borno, a British freelance journalist staying in the hotel, she was spotted exchanging words with the “InfoWarriors” earlier in the day, which caused her stay to be prematurely cut short. She said: “As my husband and I prepared to go to bed we were confronted by a hotel member of staff and a member of security. They said we had been seen talking to some people earlier who had been asked to leave, and for the safety of the staff they had been advised to ask us to leave.”

American Prisoners of War Repeatedly Shamefully Betrayed By Their Government - Shocking Documentary

American Prisoners of War Repeatedly Shamefully Betrayed By Their Government - Shocking Documentary

Posted by Charleston Voice

Beyond doubt the most horrific documentary of betrayal by Government that we have ever seen. And we thought we'd seen them all, and even have tapes of the Senator Kerry committee.  This IS a MUST WATCH selection.
Declared "Secret" in the 'national interest'? Who the #*&^@ do these political & corporate criminals think they are fooling? The records are Secret only to protect themselves from public disgrace before the American people, and probably worse.

If your think your loved one in uniform today is not expendable, and would not quickly be abandoned in the 'national interest' too, then you're a dang fool.

Sec.of State John Kerry's Legacy is one of Treason to His Country & Betrayal of our POW/MIAs
Uploaded on Oct 13, 2011
The fate of prisoners of war and missing in action is one of the darkest chapters of the Cold War. Tens of thousands of American soldiers European survivors were sent to unknown destinations during World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War.
Read our: Quartered in Hell

Dollars to donuts only one out of 100 (most likely less) Americans know about American army troops being committed to conflict by President Woodrow Wilson under British commanders on Russian soil. For an online account, go to here. A great book with photos is "Quartered in Hell" by Dennis Gordon. Nearly all of the Americans killed were from Michigan.

 

Related Posts

The Future of Health NowThis Little Weed is one of the Most Useful Medicines on the Planet - The Future of Health Now

The Future of Health NowThis Little Weed is one of the Most Useful Medicines on the Planet - The Future of Health Now

plantain

FACT: The States Have the Legal Power to Stop Barack Obama

 

http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/states-have-power-stop-obama/Obama gets nullified

Numerous states are involved in a general plan to stop President Obama and the federal government from further encroachment on the rights of the states and individuals, based on the Tenth Amendment and Article V of the Constitution.
Their plan goes around Congress and the government, using nullification to do away with unconstitutional laws and a Convention of the States to Constitutionally check the power of the federal government, something that more and more people are supporting.
Of course, the mainstream media is virtually ignoring the nullification and Convention of States movement, as they more or less support the expansion and overreach of the federal government.  It has fallen to sites like this one, and many others in the alternative media, to share the news about nullification and the Convention with you.

Many people have criticized the efforts by some states to nullify federal laws within their borders, claiming that states don’t have that power.  But in reality, states do indeed have the Constitutional right to nullify federal laws like Obamacare or gun control.
Nullification begins with a decision made in your state legislature to resist a federal law deemed to be unconstitutional. It usually involves a bill, passed by both houses and signed by your governor. In some cases, it might be approved by the voters of your state directly, in a referendum. It may change your state’s statutory law or it might even amend your state constitution. It is a refusal on the part of your state government to cooperate with, or enforce any federal law it deems to be unconstitutional.
Critics will often point to the “supremacy clause” of the Constitution as rendering state nullification illegal, but the Tenth Amendment Center argues otherwise.
The major argument used by those that oppose Nullification is the Constitution’s supremacy clause. But in fact, the arguments for the supremacy clause ARE the arguments for nullification.
The major architects of the Constitution, and those that led the fight for its adoption, laid down what the supremacy clause meant during the ratifying conventions. By doing so, they defended state sovereignty, and set the stage for the negation of unconstitutional actions.
[The Founders] established the means for the states to defend themselves and their citizens from a general government that exceeding its authority and that power is NULLIFICATION.

Then there is Article V of the Constitution, which spells out two methods for amending the document.  The first method, and the only one used thus far, is through Congress.  The second, and untried method, bypasses Congress and falls to the states, allowing them to call a Convention of the States, if two-thirds of the states agree and apply, for the purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution.
Any proposed amendments would need three-fourths of the states to agree on the amendment and then ratify it through their state legislators.  Once that occurs, the amendment would be added to the Constitution and have the same power and authority as any other part of the document.
Last year, around 100 lawmakers from several different states held a meeting at Mt. Vernon to discuss an Article V Convention, and get the process started.  Since that time, a number of states have proposed or passed resolutions, or at least shown interest in a convention, but only a couple of states have actually officially applied for a convention.
If the requisite number of states eventually apply for a convention, such a convention would likely be limited to considering only a handful of possible amendments.  Those would likely include such things as a balanced budget, mandatory caps on spending or taxes, Congressional term limits, and increased oversight on federal agencies and courts, among other things.
These are the two main methods for states to legally stop Obama and the ever-growing federal government, and reclaim their sovereignty and authority within their borders.  The nullification route is fairly straightforward, and requires only the will of the state legislature and the people to stand up and resist the federal government.  The Convention of the States is a far more involved and in-depth method, requiring cooperation from an overwhelming majority of states and the people, but the results would be more far-reaching and lasting than individual state nullification efforts.










Obama: New Foreign Policy Plan Includes Anti-Terrorism Fund, Continued Drone Strikes

Obama: New Foreign Policy Plan Includes Anti-Terrorism Fund, Continued Drone Strikes

By: Annabelle Bamforth May 28, 2014

Watch Obama Speech here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIr2KieO3I#t=31

West Point, NY- In his commencement address to the United States Military Academy, President Barack Obama made many broad remarks about his new foreign policy plan for the United States. While defending past foreign policy procedures he hinted at less global involvement, saying “to say that we have an interest in pursuing peace and freedom beyond our borders is not to say that every problem has a military solution.”

Obama expressed determination to find a balance between isolationism and interventionist practices. “At least since George Washington served as commander in chief, there have been those who warned against foreign entanglements that do not touch directly on our security or economic well-being,” said Obama. However, he continued that “it is absolutely true that in the 21st century, American isolationism is not an option. We don’t have a choice to ignore what happens beyond our borders. If nuclear materials are not secure, that poses a danger to American citizens.”

While declaring that the chances of a direct threat to the US are low, Obama remained adamant that terrorism continues to be a menace. He seeks to establish a $5 billion “terrorism partnership fund” that the White House said will train and equip other countries to fight terrorism. The fund would also be used to enact “expanded or enhanced DOD activities, such as Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance; Special Operations; and other activities,” according to a White House fact sheet.

Obama plans to cut military presence in Afghanistan down to 9,800 troops in December and slash that number in half 2015. His speech was filled with generalized statements such as:

“U.S. military action cannot be the only – or even primary – component of our leadership in every instance. Just because we have the best hammer does not mean that every problem is a nail.”

Despite reducing active military overseas and implying a humbler foreign policy, President Obama will continue the use of drone strikes. “Let me make one final point about our efforts against terrorism,” Obama said. “The partnerships I’ve described do not eliminate the need to take direct action when necessary to protect ourselves.”

Follow Annabelle on Facebook and Twitter.

Read Other Stories

Read more: http://benswann.com/obama-new-foreign-policy-plan-includes-anti-terrorism-fund-continued-drone-strikes/#ixzz336cyua5m
Follow us: @BenSwann_ on Twitter