Share

Monday, March 31, 2014

Putin and Obama: The Staged Wrestling Match of the World!

 

obama

By NC

William Shakespeare once wrote, “All the world’s a stage”. Words can never ring more true than where we are at today.

In the NWO black and white, West corner of the ring, we have the 6 foot 2 inch tall Manchurian Candidate, Barry Soetoro, the illegal, narcissistic, foreign, homosexual, Communist rat from Kenya, weighing at a tiny 165 pounds, with a 13 ½ shoe size and afraid to break a nail, swaggers in a third world, cocky way and who cannot say anything without his teleprompter and is more than happy to take credit for something good, but runs away like a sissy and searches for a scapegoat when something falls apart.

In the NWO red and black, East corner, we have the 5ft 5 inch tall (give or take) Grandmaster Chess player, Putin, the psychopathic, KGB, Black belt Judo, Communist bear himself from St. Petersburg, Russia, weighing around 215 pounds, shoe size unknown and is not afraid to get his hands dirty in or out of the ring, swaggers in a professional cocky way, doesn’t need a teleprompter, displays a cold emotionless face and shoots the scapegoat, whether something good or bad happens.

It’s Obama, the new Hitler VS Putin, the new Stalin!

Both are competing for the World Heavyweight Title, while the Western controlled Rockefellers and the Eastern controlled Rothschilds are taking bets in the background and throwing the stats on display for the International Wall Street Bankers. Both are watching the fans in order to decide, based on popular support, who will be the official good guy and who will be the official bad guy.

Meanwhile, the fans and peasants in the audience are cheering for the good guy while spitting on the bad guy, but the problem is, how do we know who is the good guy and who is the bad? How do we know there is even a good guy or even a bad guy? How do we know the people aren’t choosing the right person, but just the person who looks fashionable, regardless of whether he is good or bad?

While all of this is going on, Hollywood celebrities make a special guest appearance alongside mainstream media reporters as ringside commentary announcers, reading from a script, and creating propaganda, while using their acting skills to constantly sway and indoctrinate public opinion and support for the two wrestlers based on the audience’s reaction.

The stage crew are checking, double-checking and even triple-checking to make sure all the props, lighting and pyrotechnic special effects are ready for the all out match to begin, so that nothing falls apart before, during or even after the event has taken place. If the stage or event begins to fall apart, they know that they must work overtime to do all they can to ensure that the show must go on by implementing plan B, C, D, or even E, knowing very well that they will be creating and patching up countless loopholes for the audience, while the ringside announcers assist in their cover-ups by creating massive psychological disinformation campaigns to try and fool the crowds.

DHS and Nazi-like security officers are everywhere, guarding each post, exit, entrance, and gated area on one side while the Communist Bolsheviks are on the other, to ensure the safety of the announcers and the puppets on stage. If one of the people in the crowd attempts to hop over the fence, they will be met with the sheer force of a hundred police state goons, who will stop at nothing until that person is either beaten to a pulp, tased or shot to death, as he or she is being dragged out of the arena and onto the street. Once they return, the head of security will tell everyone that the violence was justified and any question on the matter will violate National Event Security.

No longer do the people of the world care about their false governments, consisting of Congress, Parliament and the like, battling it out for the Intercontinental Title, as none of it matters. These tiny, pathetic, political wrestling figures are mere lower class puppets, trying to gain attention from the crowd, ringside announcers and anyone else who will finance their career, promote them, and pay for their new costume, campaign theme gimmick and entrapping music, along with their special occult entrances that will make them appear larger than they really are.

Let’s not forget about the attractive, mind-controlled, Illuminati, witchcraft whores like Katy Perry, Kim Kardashian, Lady Gaga and more, who wear exotic, skimpy-looking, trashy outfits to hypnotize the males in the crowd by sucking them in a trance and making them lust and obsess over them, while the Hollywood celebrities and mainstream media ringside announcers only further demoralize the crowd and encourage their degradation into a child-like demeanor by making obnoxious comments saying, “Oh boy, look at those puppies. What I wouldn’t give to have those things in my bed at night” or “she looks like a man, but that’s okay with me”. They even go further in desensitizing the public by encouraging the females in the crowd to join in on the action in order to try and incite homosexual behavior.

The air in the world arena is filled with chem-trails, radiation, smokescreens, and drones. The stage crew and production are lining up for their tight, close-up shots, while security towers and surveillance cameras are everywhere, rotating up and down, left and right, catching and recording the crowds’ emotions and storing them in their database for future evaluation.

The match is about to begin and the crowd, some suffering from mind-controlled drugs, while others are awakening, is in a delirious state of psychological fear, anxiety, and stress, yet with a hint of excitement that the event or something along those lines is without a doubt, finally starting to commence. No one knows which wrestler will come out the victor, despite knowing the fact that it is all rigged and doesn’t even matter. Many don’t even care at this point, as it is all coming to a head.

Everyone has finished prepping and everything is up for grabs, the fences and gates around the world are now rattling, the International Wall Street Bankers are jumping 20 stories off the rafters, the National Event Security is in full riot and military gear, with MRAP vehicles waiting alongside the wings of the world arena. No one knows who is armed and who is not, as there is no way to be sure and no one is willing to move a foot or an inch to find out. It may even go nuclear!

The head Zionist announcer walks into the ring, takes the mike which is magically coming down from the sky and with one final set of words, says in an evil, yet powerful, god-like voice, for all the world to hear, “Ladies and gentlemen of the world, Lllleeeeeeetttt’s get ready to RUMBLEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!……………..”

DING! DING!

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by From the Trenches World Report of www.FromTheTrenchesWorldReport.com.

From the Trenches World Report is intent on uncovering more documented facts to bring to light that which the common man or woman is not meant to see. We are in a war for nothing less than our right to individual thought. We will be reporting on that war From the Trenches.

Putin and Obama: The Staged Wrestling Match of the World!
From the Trenches World Report
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:00:45 GMT

Terrorist ‘dirty bomb’ as easy as ever due to political upheaval, wider nuclear access — RT News

Terrorist ‘dirty bomb’ as easy as ever due to political upheaval, wider nuclear access — RT News

Terrorist ‘dirty bomb’ as easy as ever due to political upheaval, wider nuclear access

Published time: March 22, 2014 02:36
Edited time: March 22, 2014 04:54


The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flies in front of its headquarters in Vienna  (Reuters/Heinz-Peter Bader)

The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flies in front of its headquarters in Vienna (Reuters/Heinz-Peter Bader)
The UN’s nuclear watchdog has warned about the continuing threat of terrorists acquiring a “dirty bomb” after revealing that 146 incidents of unauthorized contact with radioactive materials were reported last year.
"Even if they [stolen materials] can't be used for making a nuclear weapon, they can be used in radioactive dispersal devices, which is a concern," Denis Flory, deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told Reuters ahead of a nuclear security summit next week.



Since beginning its Incident and Trafficking Database in 1993, the agency has recorded more than 2,400 illegal incidents. While most of them involved people accidentally coming upon dangerous materials – such as the scrap metal workers in India who came into contact with an old irradiator in 2010 – more than 400 are attempted crimes.



The figure from last year is broadly in line with the pattern for the past decade.



Flory said the most dangerous period was the aftermath of the break-up of the Soviet Union, where large stashes of radioactive materials were spread over a vast territory in a country that was transitioning from being a tightly-controlled state to a number of smaller entities.



But recent global instability in the Arab world means that risks of an uncontrolled spread of materials – and the demand for them – could be on the up again.



Notoriously, there are tonnes of uranium yellowcake stored in an ordinary warehouse near the city of Sabha in Libya’s unstable desert south – a situation that hasn’t been resolved in three years, despite the UN’s efforts.



As the use of nuclear technology widens and spreads to relatively poorly-secured areas, such as hospitals, the task for potential terrorists could become easier, according to the IAEA officials. The sophistication of technology available to terrorists is also possibly rising, though impossible to accurately monitor until they are caught.



There is still a lot of work to do,” summed up Flory, ahead of a worldwide nuclear summit that willbegin in The Hague next week. World leaders from 53 countries are expected to call for more international action to help prevent radical groups from obtaining atomic bombs.

Russian troops poised to 'run' into Moldova, Nato commander warns - Telegraph

Russian troops poised to 'run' into Moldova, Nato commander warns - Telegraph

Russian troops poised to 'run' into Moldova, Nato commander warns

A pro-Russian enclave of Moldova could be Moscow's next target after Crimea, Nato warns

Philip Breedlove
Philip Breedlove Photo: AFP
Fears that Russia could claw back a second chunk of former Soviet territory in Europe grew on Sunday night after Nato warned that Moscow’s troops were poised to move into a pro-Russian enclave of Moldova.
Nato’s top commander said that Russian troops massed on Ukraine’s eastern border were well placed to take Transdniester, a Russian-speaking enclave that has declared independence from the rest of Moldova.
About a third of Transdniester’s half-million people are ethnic Russians, many of whom want to return to rule from Moscow. To this day, the streets of the capital, Tiraspol, are decked out with statues of Lenin and other symbols of the Soviet Union, of which Moldova was a member until its break-up in 1991.
US Air Force Gen Philip Breedlove, who is Nato’s supreme allied commander in Europe, said that gave President Vladimir Putin a pretext to send troops in there as a “protection” force for ethnic Russians, just as he has done in Crimea.

Israel closes embassies around the world as diplomats strike | Reuters

Israel closes embassies around the world as diplomats strike | Reuters

Israel closes embassies around the world as diplomats strike

JERUSALEM Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:09am EDT

By escalating the action to a full strike - the first by the diplomatic corps since the country's establishment in 1948 - the diplomats will close all of Israel's 102 missions abroad, paralyzing most diplomatic work with other countries and the
 United Nations.The industrial action has already threatened to postpone a visit by Pope Francis to Israel planned for May - one of 25 trips by foreign officials affected by a work slowdown the diplomats began on March 5 when wage talks broke down.
(Reuters) - Israeli diplomats launched an unprecedented strike on Sunday, forcing the complete closure of embassies around the world as they escalated a dispute over pay, officials said.
"We are completely shutting down the (foreign ministry) office and missions abroad. This is the first time ever," ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said.
Another ministry official told Reuters: "As of now, the foreign ministry doesn't exist. It's not possible even to submit complaints".
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman Called the strike "irresponsible" and "a wretched decision and a display of a loss of control on union's part."
"We shall do whatever possible to minimize the damage to the country and its citizens," Lieberman said.
Diplomats said the strike - involving some 1,200 foreign service employees - was open-ended and had been called after the Treasury had failed to present any acceptable proposals.
They are demanding an increase in monthly salaries, which they put at 6,000-9,000 shekels ($1,700-$2,600), and want compensation for spouses forced to quit jobs due to foreign postings. They say about a third of their number has quit in the past 15 years due to poor wages.
Yacov Livne, spokesman for the diplomats' union, said: "the Treasury is determined to destroy the foreign ministry and Israeli diplomacy."


(Editing by Robin Pomeroy)

You Can Grow Organic Food from Table Scraps | Truthstream Media

You Can Grow Organic Food from Table Scraps | Truthstream Media

garlic-in-bucket

Judge Jeanine slams Obama - Putin's been bitchslapping you since the Edw...

Sunday, March 30, 2014

China seizes $14.5 billion assets from family, associates of ex-security chief: sources

 

Chinese authorities have seized assets worth at least 90 billion yuan ($14.5 billion) from family members and associates of retired domestic security tsar Zhou Yongkang, who is at the centre of China's biggest corruption scandal in more than six decades, two sources said.

China seizes $14.5 billion assets from family, associates of ex-security chief: sources
Sun, 30 Mar 2014 05:00:00 GMT

Shocker: comparing deaths from medical drugs, vitamins, all US wars

 

Jon Rappoport
Activist Post
People want to believe medical science gives us, at any given moment, the best of all possible worlds.
And of course, the best of all possible worlds must have its enemies: the quacks who sell unproven snake oil.
So let’s look at some facts.
As I’ve been documenting for years, the medical cartel has been engaged in massive criminal fraud, presenting their drugs as safe and effective across the board—when, in fact, these drugs have been killing and maiming huge numbers of people, like clockwork.
I’ve cited the review, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”, by Dr. Barbara Starfied (Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000), in which Starfield reveals the American medical system kills 225,000 people per year—106,000 as a direct result of pharmaceutical drugs.
I’ve now found another study, published in the same Journal, two years earlier: April 15, 1998; “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.” It, too, is mind-boggling.

The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:
Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.
Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.
The authors write: “…Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and and administered.”
So this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn’t begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, without being admitted to hospitals.
I found the link to this study at the Dr. Rath Health Foundation, in the middle of a very interesting article by Dr. Aleksandra Niedzwiecki: “Commentary on the Safety of Vitamins.”
Here are two key quotes from her article:
“In 2010, not one single person [in the US] died as a result of taking vitamins (Bronstein, et al, (2011) Clinical Toxical, 49 (10), 910-941).”
“In 2004, the deaths of 3 people [in the US] were attributed to the intake of vitamins. Of these, 2 persons were said to have died as a result of megadoses of vitamins D and E, and one person as a result of an overdose of iron and fluoride. Data from: ‘Toxic Exposure Surveillance System 2004, Annual Report, Am. Assoc. of Poison Control Centers.’”
Summing up:

  • No deaths from vitamins (2011), and three deaths (2004) from vitamins/iron/fluoride.
  • 106,000 deaths every year from pharmaceutical drugs (Starfield).
  • Between 76,000 and 137,000 deaths from pharmaceutical drugs every year in hospitalized patients (Lazerou).
The FDA and its “quack-buster” allies go after vitamins, demean “unproven remedies,” and generally take every possible opportunity to warn people about “alternatives,” on the basis that they aren’t scientifically supported.
Meanwhile, the very drugs these mobsters are promoting, and certifying as safe and effective, are killing and maiming people at a staggering rate.
The masses are treated to non-stop PR on the glories of the US medical system.
In the Wikipedia entry, “US military casualties of war,” the grand total of all military deaths in the history of this country, starting with the Revolutionary War, is 1,312,612.
In any given 10 years of modern medical treatment? 2,250,000 deaths (Starfield).
Consider how much suppression is necessary to keep the latter number under wraps.
Jon Rappoport is the author of two explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed and Exit From the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Shocker: comparing deaths from medical drugs, vitamins, all US wars
Activist
Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:55:00 GMT

Hands Off Our Vaccine Exemptions

 

Megan Heimer, NHE, JD, ND
Activist Post
I am generally a nice person. As long as someone or something does not infringe upon my rights as a parent or individual I try to stay out of it. And that’s exactly how I feel about vaccinations. I encourage you to educate yourself but ultimately, you have the the final say. That’s how it is here in the United States of America, we have the freedom to choose, freedom to parent our kids the way we see fit, and freedom from government interference into the most intimate aspects of our lives whether we are religious or not.
Or so I thought…
There was a piece published by the New York Times recently written by Dr. Kristen Feemster (a pediatric infectious disease physician who profits from “professionally advising” pharmaceutical companies and feels that a parent’s decision not to vaccinate may warrant a call to Child Protective Services) that urged the scientific and public health communities to curtail vaccine exemptions. In case you’re wondering, a vaccine exemption allows an individual to forgo the vaccination for medical, religious, and sometimes philosophical reasons. The reason for trumping these rights? The public good.
I had many problems with this article, and you should too, because it infringes on your constitutional rights as a parent, blatantly suggests that “vaccines are safe and effective,” insinuates that those of us who choose not to vaccinate our children have no educated reason for doing so, and obviously assumes that the healthcare, scientific community, and parents (the most important player in this dilemma if you will) agree on what constitutes the public good.

Here is my response to this article.
Dear Dr. Feemster, the New York Times, and anyone else who thinks I don’t have a right to (un)vaccinate my child:
I am sorry to hear that you deem a parent’s choice of whether or not to vaccinate with so little regard. Need I refer you to the United States Constitution where it has been decided and upheld by the United States Supreme Court on numerous occassions that parents’ have the right to the care, custody, and control of their children, freedom to rear their children without government interference, the freedom of expression and religion, freedom of privacy, and protection under the first, ninth, and 14th amendments. The right to raise my child as I see fit and the right to decide what I do and do not put into my body or my child’s is a fundamental right granted to me as a citizen of the United States of America. (See Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Wisconsin v. Yoder, Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, Meyer v. Nebraska, City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health Inc., Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Stanley v Illinois, Quilloin v. Walcott, Parham v. J. R, etc.)
You claim that personal and philosophical exemptions should be curtailed because of those who cannot medically receive vaccines. What about those of us who are subjected to virus shedding on a daily basis by those individuals who have chosen to vaccinate? What about those of us vaccinated or not, who have gotten sick as a result of a vaccine induced virus outbreak (like whooping cough, measles, and meningitis). What about the billions of dollars we sink into healthcare every year to cover the rising costs associated with the surge of childhood diseases, all of which are listed as side-effects on the vaccine inserts and have increased as the number of vaccines on the child immunization schedule have increased? What about the vaccine-injured children? Should we not be worried about protecting our children from the serious and sometimes debilitating vaccine-induced conditions? Are my religious freedoms not protected when it comes to vaccinations? Is my educated opinion that vaccines are harmful to the human body of less value than yours? What about the millions of Americans and medical professionals who think the same?
You state that vaccines are safe and effective but as a member of the scientific and healthcare community I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion. You see, vaccines are not research effective because they are not subjected to double-blind placebo controlled studies using a saline solution that is the standard for evidence-based medicine. Vaccinations are tested against other vaccinations, adjuvants, and complex vaccinations – this not only yields inaccurate results but altered and inaccurate safety data. How can you know if something is truly safe if it is not tested against a placebo?
“Vaccines are safe and effective. The significant reduction in illness and death from vaccine-preventable diseases is testimony to how well they work.”
You claim vaccines are safe. Have you read the package inserts, studies, or checked out the VAERS database lately? If you had, you would see side-effects like these: (Boostrix - Tdap) blood and lymphatic system disorders, immune system disorders, myocarditis, nervous system disorders, convulsions, seizures, encephalitis (brain swelling), facial palsy, skin disorders; (Pediarix IPV + DTaP + Hep B) Sudden infant death (SIDS), death, seizures, meningitis, paralysis, anaphylactic shock, encephalitis, skin and tissue disorders; (Chicken pox / Varicella) eczema, vaccine-strain chicken pox, lower respiratory infections, seizures, encephalitis, cerebrovascular accident, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, aseptic meningitis, pneumonia; (Merk’s Hep-B) Guillain-Barré Syndrome, ringing in the ears, multiple sclerosis, myelitis including transverse myelitis, seizure, febrile seizure, peripheral neuropathy including Bell’s Palsy, herpes zoster, migraine, arthritis. Merk’s MMR vaccine insert is laughable. And I quote,

“Measles, mumps, and rubella are three common childhood diseases, caused by measles virus, mumps virus (paramyxoviruses), and rubella virus (togavirus), respectively, that may be associated with serious complications and/or death. For example, pneumonia and encephalitis are caused by measles. Mumps is associated with aseptic meningitis, deafness and orchitis; and rubella during pregnancy may cause congenital rubella syndrome in the infants of infected mothers.”
Assuming for a moment that the MMR vaccine actually works, the above sounds pretty good…until you get to the bottom of the insert where you see that the vaccine is associated with the same side-effects of the disease it’s designed to prevent:
“Panniculitis; atypical measles; fever; syncope; headache; dizziness; malaise; irritability, vasculitis, pancreatitis; diarrhea; vomiting; parotitis; nausea, diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, purpura, regional lymphadenopathy; leukocytosis, anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions have been reported as well as related phenomena such as angioneurotic edema, arthritis, myalgia, athralgia, encephalitis; encephalopathy; measles inclusion body encephalitis, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE); Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM); febrile convulsions; afebrile convulsions or seizures; ataxia; polyneuritis; polyneuropathy; ocular palsies; paresthesia.”
I’m sorry, I’m vaccinating against a rash that has a less chance of causing death than you falling out your bedroom window, being struck by lightening, and drowning in a puddle, so that I can increase my child’s chance of getting one of the side-effects listed above? No thanks. I don’t gamble (especially with those odds). That’s not safe or effective.
And of course, all of these inserts say the same thing: “This list includes serious events or events which have causal connection to components of this or other vaccines or drugs. Because these events are reported voluntarily, from a population of uncertain size, it is not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to the vaccine.”
Does this seem like evidence-based medicine to you? Do you think this pharmaceutical company can’t establish a causal relationship between vaccinations and side-effects because of the poor manner in which they conduct their studies (and because they do not want to insinuate fault)? As a parent, don’t you think the wisest thing to do is to make sure these substances are held to the highest testing and safety standards before they’re injected into children? Are you really making me choose between a measles rash and brain encephalitis?
And I love how the package insert insinuates that the vaccine some how played a role in eradicating measles, mumps, and rubella:
“For measles, 894,134 cases reported in 1941 compared to 288 cases reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.97% decrease in reported cases; for mumps, 152,209 cases reported in 1968 compared to 840 cases reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.45% decrease in reported cases; and for rubella, 57,686 cases reported in 1969 compared to 200 cases reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.65% decrease.”
I find this correlation (that the vaccine eradicated or reduced these illnesses) interesting especially because the first measles vaccine wasn’t even put on the market until 1963. So we have twenty years unaccounted for here and the actual data shows a stark decline in mortality of measles before the vaccine was introduced. Isn’t that convenient? The same is true for polio, pertussis, diphtheria, and the rest. (Here’s a good read on that).

Vaccines did not eradicate these diseases. Quarantine programs, sanitation, clean living conditions, and clean water did. If you look at how these viruses are transmitted (dirty water, poop, unpasteurized milk from infected cows, etc.) and the time frame during which these diseases actually decreased you’ll see this occurred during a time in both Britain and United States History where our society became more industrialized as a whole and access to clean water, clean food, and public health services drastically improved. But we’ll just pretend that the high prevalence of these diseases in other parts of the world like Africa and India have nothing to do with the fact that there are millions of people living in poverty without access to clean living conditions or water.
But wait, what about whooping cough?
Not only was the mortality rate practically nonexistent before the introduction of the pertussis vaccine, the actual prevalence of pertussis was relatively unaffected by the vaccine until 2003-2004 when the outbreaks doubled. Of course this was attributed to “better diagnostic and reporting methods” which is code for “the new vaccine we created to replace the old vaccine has failed miserably and has made the vaccinate dasymptomatic carriers that can infect anyone in the population…Oops.” I know, the unvaccinated are easy scapegoats but according to the science, we’re not the carriers causing the outbreaks here.
The Era of Chronic Disease
I have to agree with your article, we are fortunate to live in an era where we rarely see polio, small pox, diptheria, and other major illnesses. I certainly am not a fan of paralytic polio or any sickness for that matter – what parent is? But to say that these diseases are “vaccine-preventable” or that the vaccine eradicated these illnesses is a stretch at best (you can look at other countries who have comparable vaccination rates and see the failures here).
Do you really think that the increase in chronic disease in this country has nothing to do with the massive amount of vaccines being shoved at the American people? If you can’t see the correlation…please read the vaccine inserts here.
No, what I see around me is a new generation of disease. We have a 1 in 50 autism rate – the highest in history and of any other country. We have diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, Crohn’s disease, eczema, learning disabilities, neurological disorders, seizure disorders, birth defects, psoriasis, food allergies, thyroid conditions, and outbreaks of vaccine-strain disease like pertussis, measles, shingles, and mumps. Does this seem like a win to you?
Ask any parent with an autistic child if they’d rather choose a simple fever and rash that lasts for 3-5 days that gives their child life-time immunity or the life-long condition of autism (which is listed as an adverse reaction on page 11 of the Tripedia DTaP insert which is now discontinued, but not before millions of children were injected). I think WE as PARENTS owe it to our children to make sure these vaccines, with absolute certainty, do not cause these diseases before we inject anything and everything into our children on a whim. Oh, but how can we do that when vaccines are not research effective?
Herd immunity does not exists when it comes to vaccines.
Herd immunity is this concept that a certain percentage of the population needs to be vaccinated in order to eradicate a disease. Herd immunity does not exist with vaccines and here’s why:
Herd immunity only applies to those diseases that are naturally derived that confer lifetime immunity. Vaccine manufactures promise to introduce an antibody. They do not promise the antibody will work (e.g. MMR vaccine insert) and if it does work it only confers temporary immunity for up to 4-10 years. Chicken pox vaccine gives immunity for “unknown duration” but no more than 10 years, MMR is unknown, Pertussis “protection” is a joke, Hep B is a maximum of seven.
So my child could get the simple childhood chicken pox as a child and have lifetime protection, or she could get vaccinated, get sick anyway (by chicken pox or one of the many other diseases associated with the vaccine), have only temporary (if any) immunity, and increase her chances by 50% of getting shingles as an adult?
But wait, I should be happy that my infant is at least getting some protection from the mean hepatitis B that is transmitted via sex and dirty needles. I was really worried about that one. Good thing she’ll get another booster when she starts school to prevent that risky kindergarten behavior.
So we have a bunch of vaccinated people out there who may or may not have developed antibodies and if they have, will have “worn off” in a period of days, months, or years. How many people in their 30s and 40s do you know who have been vaccinated lately? Why do we not see these “vaccine preventable” outbreaks in this age group? Why are the outbreaks occurring among the most heavily vaccinated population and in the vaccinated themselves? And is it safe to get continuous boosters of these vaccines throughout the course of one’s life? Has anyone done a study on the long-term effects of repeated vaccines? What about the accumulation of heavy metals like mercury, formaldehyde, and aluminum that have an affinity to the brain and intestines and accumulate in toxic levels in the body? What about the DNA of the cells (of aborted fetuses and animals) and its ability to interact with our own?
Don’t you think these are questions that need to be answered before we go “curtailing” a person’s exemption rights?
Dr. Feemster, please let me tell you why I as a parent and educated individual have chosen not to vaccinate my children:
Vaccines have not been proven safe. They are not effective. They have not eradicated any diseases. They cause illness including the ones they are designed to prevent. They cause viruses to mutate and strains of what were simple childhood diseases to become more virulent. Vaccines assault the immune system, contain additives that are deemed harmful and toxic by the EPA and FDA, and are responsible for the most recent outbreaks of pertussis, measles, mumps, and meningitis. The CDC’s response to their failed vaccine? Get more boosters because somehow getting more of something that didn’t work in the first place is logical.
My decision to “unvaccinate” my child in no way affects your children or anyone else’s children. If anything we should protect the people who cannot be vaccinated from children who are, since many of the vaccines cause virus shedding for six weeks or more. In addition, my unvaccinated child does not put anyone else’s vaccinated child at risk. If their child is vaccinated then shouldn’t they be protected?
And finally, please tell me how my child, who has never has measles, whooping cough, (or any other sickness for that matter) is responsible for the recent outbreaks of these diseases – in the almost exclusively vaccinated population no less. Blaming an unvaccinated child for the spread of a disease they’ve never had on a population that is almost entirely vaccinated is like you blaming a random person’s cat in Oklahoma for the grey hair you found on your head. Exactly. It’s ridiculous at best.
Until doctors receive training in medical school on the subject of vaccinations (that goes beyond the viewing of a child’s picture in a third world country who has the rarest and worst case of polio known to man), and start reading the package inserts, educating patients on the potential risks, are knowledgeable on the history and “science” of vaccines, and are willing to accept the liability for my child becoming injured as a result of what comes through the needle… I will always… ALWAYS… question my doctor.
Until the media stops promoting agendas from financial backers, I’ll question them too. And until a pharmaceutical company decides to properly research the product they’re promoting and puts the welfare of the people over the buck, I’ll question them too.
Until vaccines are properly tested, proven to be safe, proven to work, not exempt from liability, free of harmful additives, and proven to be incapable of harming my child…I will not be vaccinating. And as a parent and citizen of the United States, as an individual who has done their research, as a professional married to a physician – it is my right to say no. For the sake of the “public good,” let’s start asking questions. You don’t have to have a degree to read a package insert or to understand what it says.
Until then, hands off our exemptions.
Megan Heimer is an attorney, traditional naturopathic doctor, registered yoga teacher, certified natural health educator, and has a bachelors degree in political science. She's married to a Physician and blogs about all things alternative medicine, whole foods, healthy living, and attachment parenting at www.LivingWhole.org where this article first appeared.

Hands Off Our Vaccine Exemptions
Activist
Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:03:00 GMT