TiLTNews Network: Earth Watch - Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference, not by safety. It is easy to clamor for government security when terrible things happen; but liberty is given true meaning when we support it without exception, and we will be safer for it ~ Dr. Ron Paul
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
Monday, February 26, 2018
Saturday, February 24, 2018
THE GREATEST ASSAULT YET: THEY'RE SIMULTANEOUSLY GOING AFTER OUR SPEECH ...
THE MOST CENSORED STORY IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
DEFEND THE 2ND AMENDMENT!!!
Defend your God given right OR LOSE IT to subjugation!
THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS NON-NEGOTIABLE
Los Angeles & Boston, March 24,
Los Angeles June 2
#RightToDefend
#DefendThe2ndAmendment
More dates and locations to come. See below.
#RightToDefend #DefendThe2ndAmendment #ProtectYourLovesOnes
MAR24
Boston - March 24th - Defend the 2nd Amendment
Sat 12 PM EDT · 176 guests
Boston, MA
Interested
MAR24
Los Angeles - March 24th - Defend the 2nd Amendment
Sat 12 PM · 2 guests
Los Angeles
Interested
JUN2
Boston - June 2nd for the 2nd Amendment
Sat 12 PM EDT · 355 guests
Boston, MA
Interested
JUN2
Los Angeles - June 2nd for the 2nd Amendment
Sat 11 AM · Lorene is interested
Los Angeles
Monday, February 19, 2018
What Law?
Posted on February 19, 2018
Any illegals where you live? Any who lives outside the law? Been in outlaw territory at any time in your life? Which of you have been subject to the whim of a true illegal?
I need to know if anyone knows any crooks who follow the law?
Does anyone have any rights left?
Who thinks it is alright to take away our right to self-defense?
So far, to date, none of anything done to lessen danger has worked, BUT, the idea is wrapped in,’For Your Safety’.
So when is the general public going to get their very own bullet proof vest whenever they go to any public place? Think of all ball games, the mall, the store, 7-11, or going to work. Who is, or might be, subjected to a drive by shooting?
Seeing as how the gun grabber, gun eliminator, liberal/socialists heard of the Florida school shooting, they all lose it and are now screaming to eliminate ALL guns, especially anything more powerful than a BB gun. Really?
To get real, two of the so-called ‘school shootings’ were one with a pellet rifle and the other one a sling shot! We really need to outlaw these items too.
I see a lot of ‘opinions’ on this subject by people who have never been forced to defend themselves, especially when it comes to defending your life or anyone elses for that matter.
Under this ideal society, no one should have or carry any kind of firearm, privately or publicly. For starters, eliminate the armed guards who protect government officials. Following that, no guns for law enforcement at any level, of any kind.
America NEEDS to defund the UN small arms treaty, among other things, and there are a lot of ‘things’.
What needs done? Certain officials desperately need a new alarm clock to wake them up to the real problem.
There is no gun that fires itself. Put a loaded weapon on a counter top or desk, and turn up the surveillance cameras. After that gun sits there and, by itself, doesn’t shoot anyone, tell us again that ‘the gun did it’.
Must be a person who should never have had a firearm that did the shooting, Hmmm??? The Florida Case is not unique, as most of these ‘shooters’ were known to be possible problems. However, just about every ‘authority’ at every level, were officially notified. How is it that something as obvious as this could be allowed to happen anyway? Rumors around the net say that this was a ‘special covert’ op. I strongly suggest that this is the case in most of the shootings. Why? Simply, no one can be that stupid or incompetent as to miss anything as obvious. I hope this will be sorted out, but, I also hear that law enforcement is worried about being outgunned, and overmatched.
IF all these gun grabbers are so intent on grabbing guns, how about we start with all street gangs? Not limited to just those carrying, but we want the supplier. Who sold you the guns? Still want to legislate? There used to be The National Firearms Act, that gave mandatory sentences to anyone breaking the law and had a gun, let alone used one. Today, there are no gun charges leveled against these ‘Illegals’. WHY NOT?
Today, those who commit a crime with a gun are turned loose? Duality of the justice system has two sets of laws, one for the have’s, and one for the have-nots. Justice might be blind, but she can hear the coins drop in her purse. Knows which side her bread is buttered on, and by whom.
In order to take any action towards any kind of ‘solution’, the big money from illegal’s is one target, and the other are all those involved. How many will an effort that big call for? Try everyone who refuses to be ‘subject’. Addiction is out of control, be it money, power, and/or appetites of the never done anything’s, and that extremely infectious disease known as ‘Entitlements’. I am the center of the universe and my wants/needs outweigh everyone’s elses comfort, dignity, and right to personal space. Let alone ‘personal defense’.
When somethings happens, most are not reported, and the police are not called because the police are just as apt to shoot you as the crook who shot first. We do need law enforcement people, but only those who can maintain under extreme stress and conditions. Going into that great unknown of a situation is no excuse, sure you’re nervous, excited, and the adrenaline is flowing like a flood. Grit your teeth and perform as you are expected to, professionally at all times. Never be trigger happy, never arbitrarily open fire, and de-escalate. Be the person of calm, cool, collected lack of action, peacemaker.
As far as guns go, these tools are NOT the problem, BUT, maybe a legislated law that calls for counceling/counseling for people who raise any kind of red flag? At the least, an intense interview to see if a problem can be found. Maybe an automatic red flag on gun purchases until after that interview?
What is the point of talking when direct action is needed? ‘We’ will need to now take that direct action in order to prevent more death.
I have seen direct action on the battlefield of Vietnam. The battle has shifted to our streets. I ask those who would forbid available deadly force options to consider what that saying means,’It is better to have a gun and not need one, than to need one and not have one’. This should go to the application from you against the addict who is breaking into your house to do whatever it takes to get their next fix. Insane? Far out? I applaud a concealed carry person for gunning down a person who was carrying an AK-47 as they were about to enter a mall. No, I don’t like the idea that everyone needs to carry, but I give the nutcase intent on random killing no slack.
Who is ready to use deadly force for self-defense? Those who are willing to sacrifice everything to protect the little kids, that is who.
I am one, and I carry.
Trump Eviscerates Liberals' Gun Control Narrative With Epic History Lesson
Trump Eviscerates Liberals' Gun Control Narrative With Epic History Lesson http://ow.ly/NnSZ30iunM1
President Trump denounced racism a ZILLION times, yet the media STILL li...
No matter what the left or liberals lies are, they are lies. No person in their right mind would support the KKK and President Trump has disavowed them dozens of times but because the Dems need talking points, because they have no agenda, they will not stop trying to undermine the Presidency. They would rather tear America apart than to just admit they are wrong. Beware patriots your enemy is within. #SeditionInFullSwing
Sunday, February 18, 2018
Saturday, February 17, 2018
Friday, February 16, 2018
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
Commiefornia, Is It A Lost Cause? Beware America, Your State May Be Next
Exclusive: California School Bans “Racially Insensitive” National Anthem at Assemblies – Parent Speaks Out on the Latest Insanity
February 14, 2018 by Jim Hoft 2 Comments
This week the San Ramon High School in California announced it would no longer play the National Anthem at school rallies.
Student body president Ariyana Kermanizadeh said the anthem finds joy in killing African-Americans.
Student leaders at the high school decided the US national anthem was racially insensitive. And, of course, the teachers all agreed with the decision and made it a new policy to ban the national anthem.
This is the modern day left.
A parent at the high school wrote The Gateway Pundit hoping to see more light shed on this social justice insanity.
I’m hoping to draw further attention to a significant problem at California High School in San Ramon, California. Todd Starnes at Fox News has already addressed this in part but I would like to see more light shed on this in an effort to bring additional pressure on the anti-American liberals who run the school and district.
I am the father of a student at the school, and when my eldest son came home and told me about this I was outraged. Effectively a handful of disgruntled snowflakes did not like a reference to “the hireling and slave” in the third verse of the Star-Spangled Banner. As a result, the national anthem will no longer be played at student gatherings. The school administration put out a piece this afternoon claiming that they were attempting to be inclusive and mindful of issues which may make some students uncomfortable. Of course, they don’t take the feelings of the mainstream into account with their radicalized agenda on issues involving gender or other hot topics. It seems that only the left is given the benefit of the doubt on these things. Frankly, I’m tired of being on the defensive.
So he-she wrote us to bring more attention to the story.
We are happy to oblige…
Commiefornia, Is It A Complete Lost Cause?
Exclusive: California School Bans “Racially Insensitive” National Anthem at Assemblies – Parent Speaks Out on the Latest Insanity
February 14, 2018 by Jim Hoft 2 Comments
This week the San Ramon High School in California announced it would no longer play the National Anthem at school rallies.
Student body president Ariyana Kermanizadeh said the anthem finds joy in killing African-Americans.
Student leaders at the high school decided the US national anthem was racially insensitive. And, of course, the teachers all agreed with the decision and made it a new policy to ban the national anthem.
This is the modern day left.
A parent at the high school wrote The Gateway Pundit hoping to see more light shed on this social justice insanity.
I’m hoping to draw further attention to a significant problem at California High School in San Ramon, California. Todd Starnes at Fox News has already addressed this in part but I would like to see more light shed on this in an effort to bring additional pressure on the anti-American liberals who run the school and district.
I am the father of a student at the school, and when my eldest son came home and told me about this I was outraged. Effectively a handful of disgruntled snowflakes did not like a reference to “the hireling and slave” in the third verse of the Star-Spangled Banner. As a result, the national anthem will no longer be played at student gatherings. The school administration put out a piece this afternoon claiming that they were attempting to be inclusive and mindful of issues which may make some students uncomfortable. Of course, they don’t take the feelings of the mainstream into account with their radicalized agenda on issues involving gender or other hot topics. It seems that only the left is given the benefit of the doubt on these things. Frankly, I’m tired of being on the defensive.
So he-she wrote us to bring more attention to the story.
We are happy to oblige…
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Call this treasonous Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis’ Chambers
Let him know that as an American you are offended by his arrogant “politically motivated” challenge of the March 5 deadline to end or continue DACA and Americans have already spoken on the matter! They voted Donald Trump in to end it! #NODACA #NOAMNESTY
Leave a message with his clerk here:
Chambers Phone: (718) 613-2540
Here is his left leaning mentally deranged thinking on the matter. He clearly is devoid of discerning fact over fiction.
“The question before the court is thus not whether defendants could end the DACA program, but whether they offered legally adequate reasons for doing so,” wrote Judge Garaufis, a Clinton appointee to the court in New York. “Based on its review of the record before it, the court concludes that defendants have not done so.” http://go.shr.lc/2GbSHPm
This judge is a liar and a Clintonite groupie who are all now embroiled in a Congressional investigation of lawlessness, undermining the rule of law and outright treason.
DACA was first and foremost unconstitutional, it was also temporary and it needs to be eradicated beginning to end. We already take in and vet one million immigrants per year and have so for decades upon decades upon decades.
DACA recipients ARE NOT citizens and therefore have no right to our courts, our benefits, schools, medicine and everything else because they are ‘ILLEGALLY HERE’ due to an improper act by President Obama. Congress never cleared DACA, they voted against it and Barry (also under investigation for treason) signed a paper and did it in spite of Americans regardless that he had no standing to do so.
DACA recipients have had years to become citizens but didn’t. Why? Because they are not here for America, they are here to take advantage of our better living and fully intend on undermining the rule of law. Don’t believe me? Ask yourself, how is it that immigrants, unlawfully living here, can make demands on the citizens of America just because they say so?
This is not about human rights, it is about respect. Take a good hard look at these DACA recipients. They are healthy, educated and are adults, not children. If you want to become a citizen, GET IN LINE! Becoming a citizen in America is a privilege, not a right unless you are actually born here, which none of you were. It’s just that simple.
DACA recipient: Ask your parents why they did this to you?; Ask them why they aren’t citizens?; Ask yourselves why aren’t you?
Here is what people who have been in Judge Garaufis’ courtroom have to say about him. Mind you it’s ALL negative from lawyers and participants including the jury. By all signs he is a political activist who has weaponized his position. He needs to be impeached, recalled or just fired, even if it is a lifetime appointment. Treason is as Treason does.
There’s more comments on the site, (link below):
Hon. Nicholas G. Garaufis
See Rating Details
District Judge
See Comments
E.D.N.Y.
Comment #: 24216
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Unstable, vindictive, biased, with a nasty temperament. Other than that, he's a good judge.
Comment #: 13177
Rating:5.0
Comments:
A good person who really has no business being in the crucible of knowledgeable and fair decision-making of a federal courtroom. Makes rulings with an error ratio that is higher than if he simply flipped a coin. You never know whether you will get Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde each time he takes the bench.
Comment #: 12264
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Just doesn't get how important a role he can play...clueless and venal.
Comment #: 12132
Rating:1.0
Comments:
His humiliation of the Asian woman who truthfully answered questions on her jury questionnaire more than aptly demonstrates his politically correct liberal view. He is UNFIT to serve in any capacity of government. Remove that piece of trash from the bench!
Comment #: 10106
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Given these lawyer comments, why is this guy not being looked into by whatever Senators or judicial authorities tasked with the responsibility to do something. Lifetime appointment can't possibly mean lifetime no matter what...
Comment #: 9999
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
To the one who posted comment # 9938, don't know if it's the same incident you refer to but I too heard that this judge sent U.S. Marshals to someone's home solely because the guy had telephoned his chambers - the guy had done nothing wrong or threatening and was polite. It was very intimidating. The judge must think he's on the bench in some third world dictatorship.
Comment #: 9939
Rating:1.1
Comments:
A real treasure on the bench-he should be buried. No inkling of what a fair and impartial jurist is. Will bend over backwards to accomodate Gov't. Will go out of his way to screw any other litigant. Once he forms an idea-no matter how absurd, he does not re-consider. Just pile more fertilizer on top and hope something grows.
Comment #: 9938
Rating:1.4
Comments:
This judge holds litigants to a strict and inflexible time schedule. however, when he is expected to rule he takes his sweet time and often comes to the wrong conclusion. He is extremely pro-government and inclined to judicial activism. Has no clue about the rules of evidence, civil rights violations or, what the US Constitution is really about. Readily dismisses civil rights claims against prosecutors and law enforcement. Uses the US Marshall's Office to intimidate litigants. A real spineless coward by definition.
Comment #: 9902
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Intellectual lightweight and an activist who doesn't belong on the bench.
Click here to see more: http://go.shr.lc/2GcrPOW
Subscribe to:
Comments
(
Atom
)