TiLTNews Network: Earth Watch

TiLTNews Network: Earth Watch - Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference, not by safety. It is easy to clamor for government security when terrible things happen; but liberty is given true meaning when we support it without exception, and we will be safer for it ~ Dr. Ron Paul

Share

Sunday, May 31, 2015

» Liberals Think TPP is a Conspiracy Theory Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

» Liberals Think TPP is a Conspiracy Theory Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!:





Liberals Think TPP is a Conspiracy Theory
Americans dangerously unaware of globalist trade takeover

by Rex Jones | Infowars.com | May 30, 2015
Share on Facebook3171Tweet about this on Twitter198Share on Google+0Email this to someonePrint this page

Infowars reporter Rex Jones takes to the streets of Austin, Texas, to ask locals if they know what the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) is and whether they support this totalitarian secret trade deal set to crush our labor laws, food standards, internet freedom and health regulations.
Posted by Earth Watch at 1:31 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Saturday, May 30, 2015

5/29/2015 -- Global Earthquake Forecast -- Americas, Asia, Europe = Majo...

Posted by Earth Watch at 9:25 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Friday, May 29, 2015

Clinton Foundation hit with racketeering lawsuit | WashingtonExaminer.com

Clinton Foundation hit with racketeering lawsuit | WashingtonExaminer.com.
Clinton Foundation hit with racketeering lawsuit

By Sarah Westwood

| May 27, 2015 | 5:00 am
Photo - The lawsuit, filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, includes a legal request to have the Florida judge seize the private server on which Hillary Clinton and her aides hosted their emails while she served as secretary of state. (AP Photo) 

Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation have been hit with a racketeering lawsuit in Florida court.

The lawsuit, filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, includes a
legal request to have the Florida judge seize the private server on
which Hillary Clinton and her aides hosted their emails while she served
as secretary of state.

Klayman has filed dozens of lawsuits against the Clintons and other prominent politicians.

The racketeering, influenced and corrupt organizations, or RICO, case
alleges the former first couple and their family philanthropy traded
political favors for donations or generous speaking fees for Bill
Clinton while his wife was the nation's chief diplomat.

"Negotiations by email about influencing U.S. foreign policy or U.S.
Government actions to benefit donors to ... The Clinton Foundation or
sponsors of speaking engagements would not be captured on a U.S.
Government email account because her emails would not be with a U.S.
Government official," Klayman said in court documents obtained by the Washington Examiner.
"Hillary Clinton deleted 32,000 email messages from her email
server that included her communications arranging, negotiating, and
agreeing upon speaking engagements by Bill Clinton in return for large
speaking fees and donations to The Clinton Foundation," the documents,
dated May 20, said.

Klayman pushed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Florida to order a "neutral forensic expert ... to take custody and
control of the private email server and reconstruct and preserve the
official U.S. Government records relating to the conduct of U.S. foreign
policy during Defendant Secretary Clinton's term as Secretary of
State."

Hillary Clinton handed over 55,000 printed pages of emails to the
State Department in November of last year and reportedly erased the
remaining records off her private server.

Critics of Clinton's decision to forgo use of an official email
account argue the presidential candidate could have simply withheld any
incriminating messages from the batch she gave the State Department.

Her supporters have dubbed the quest for Clinton's State Department emails a partisan "witch hunt."

Klayman pointed to the litany of scandals involving missing records
that have followed the Clintons for decades, including the fact that
thousands of emails disappeared
during Bill Clinton's administration after White House officials
threatened internal computer experts who blew the whistle on the
"suppression."

"It's a perfect RICO case, it fits completely," Klayman said of the
lawsuit. "Our Congress doesn't even have the guts to subpoena her
documents. They'd rather get on Fox News. So we felt had to bring that
case. Somebody's got to do it."

Klayman said a major reason for his lawsuit involves the fact that
Cheryl Mills, then-chief of staff to Hillary Clinton, and the secretary
of state herself "lied to the lower court" in by claiming there were no
documents related to a pair of Freedom of Information Act requests he
filed in 2012 while knowing those records actually did exist on the
private server.

One FOIA, filed May 2012, pertained to allegations that Hillary
Clinton issued waivers for preferred companies to do business with Iran
despite strict congressional sanctions. The other probed a 2012 leak of
classified information about Israel and Iran to the New York Times and
was filed in June of that year.

Klayman said records on the Clintons' private server are "in imminent
danger of being lost" in court documents and urged the court to
intervene.

Clinton Foundation officials did not return a request for comment on the case.

The massive charity drew fire after a book by Peter Schweizer entitled Clinton Cash
suggested foreign governments and companies with interests before the
State Department donated to the foundation with the expectation that
Hillary or Bill Clinton would ensure they received preferential
treatment from the agency.
Posted by Earth Watch at 11:54 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

ISIS Vows to Attack ‘Draw the Prophet’ Contest in Phoenix

Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

ISIS Vows to Attack ‘Draw the Prophet’ Contest in Phoenix

Contest planned for this weekend
ISIS Vows to Attack 'Draw the Prophet' Contest in Phoenix
by Joe Biggs | Infowars.com |
May 29, 2015



A ‘Draw Muhammad’ contest will be held in Phoenix, Ariz., this weekend, which ISIS vows to attack. 





Posted by Earth Watch at 10:15 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Julian Assange On TPP: Only 5 Of 29 Sections Are About "Traditional Trade," Covers "Essentially Every Aspect Of A Modern Economy"

Julian Assange On TPP: Only 5 Of 29 Sections Are About "Traditional" Trade,
"Essentially Every Aspect Of A Modern Economy" | Video |
RealClearPolitics

Julian Assange On TPP: Only 5 Of 29 Sections Are About "Traditional Trade," Covers "Essentially Every Aspect Of A Modern Economy"

Speaking from his 'prison' in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange explains the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty, which would link his home country of Australia with the U.S. economically. "It is mostly not about trade," Assange says. "Only 5 of the 29 Chapters are about traditional trade."

JULIAN ASSANGE, WIKILEAKS: First of all, it is the largest ever international economic treaty that has ever been negotiated, very considerably larger than NAFTA. It is mostly not about trade, only 5 of the 29 Chapters are about traditional trade.

The others are about regulating the internet, and what information internet service providers have to collect, they have to hand it over to companies under certain circumstances, the regulation of labor
conditions, regulating the way you can favor local industry, regulating the hospital, health care system, privatization of hospitals, so essentially every aspect of a modern economy, even banking services are in the TPP.
So that is erecting and embedding new ultramodern neoliberal structure over U.S. law and the laws of other countries. And putting it in treaty form.

By putting it in a treaty form, there are 14 countries involved, that means it is very hard to overturn, so if there is a desire, a democratic desire to do it on a different path. For example, to introduce more public transport. Then you can't easily change the TPP treaty, because you have to go back to the other nations involved.

Now looking at that example, what if the government or a state government decides it wants to build a hospital somewhere, and there is a private hospital has been erected nearby.

Well the TPP gives the constructor of the private hospital the right to sue the government over the expect loss, the loss in expected future profits. This is an expected future loss, this is not an actual loss that has been sustained, this is a claim about the future.

We know from similar instruments where governments can be sued over free trade treaties, that that is used to construct a chilling effect on environmental and health regulation laws. For example, Togo, Australia, Uruguay are all being sued by tobacco company Phillip Morris to prevent them from introducing health warnings on cigarette packaging...

It is not even an even playing field, lets say you were going to let companies, make it easier for companies to sue governments, maybe that is right, maybe the government is too powerful and companies should have the right to sue them in certain circumstances.

But it is only multinationals that get this right. U.S. companies that operate in the U.S. in relation to investments that happen in the U.S. will not have this right.

Julian Assange's Wikileaks website is the only place where you can read one of the 29 secret chapters of this treaty. Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei. The TPP is the largest economic treaty in history, including countries that represent more than 40 per cent of the world´s GDP.

Related Videos:
Richard Trumka: TPP "Designed To Be Infinitely Expandable," May Be "The Last Trade Agreement"

Obama Takes Shot At MSNBC Over Trade Deal: Opposition "Full Of Misinformation"

MSNBC's Ed Schultz Blows Up On Obama Over Trade Deal: "If You Want To Go Face To Face With Me, President Obama, I'm Ready"

Earnest: Failure To Fast-Track Trade Deal A "Procedural Snafu"

Warren: Trade Deal "Secret Because If Details Were Made Public Now, The Public Would Oppose It"

Noam Chomsky: Every Word In The Phrase "Free Trade Agreement" Is False

Kim Dotcom: Julian Assange Will Be "Hillary's Worst Nightmare" In 2016


Related Topics: Trade Promotion Authority, Free Trade, Trade, Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership, Wikileaks, Julian Assange
Posted by Earth Watch at 8:23 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Why the Elite Wants to Create More Social Disorder

Authoritarianism needs to be re-branded in the minds of the public

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
May 28, 2015

96 per cent of Americans believe that the U.S. will witness more Baltimore-style riots this summer.
The elite know these riots are coming, because to a large extent, their policies have created the environment for them.
Wealth inequality, which is proven to cause social unrest, is at its worst since before World War II.
But wealth inequality isn’t caused by a failure of capitalism, it’s caused by catastrophic Keynesian central bank policies that have instituted endless money printing and worldwide inflation.
But by blaming capitalism, leftists who warn about wealth inequality are playing right into the elite’s hands – because their solution is going to be more power in the hands of the state and central banks, the very same policies which caused the problem in the first place.
Wealth inequality is being exacerbated by a drop in real wages. As real wages fall, it will become increasingly harder to pacify younger generations via consumer culture. With religion, family and social mobility all declining in influence, lifestyles built around the acquisition of products will become harder to maintain as the economic environment worsens – prompting further disenfranchisement amongst young people.
This effect is amplified by the global political awakening acknowledged by elitists like Zbigniew Brzezinski, a political renaissance that has been driven by the increasingly widespread availability of information thanks to the Internet.
This awakening has in turn led to more distrust in government and leadership in the United States and other western countries – another precondition for civil unrest.
The toxic cocktail of increased corruption, social alienation, and lack of community (all contributory factors to the 2011 London riots), will heighten the risk of domestic disorder.
In an effort to derail this organic global political awakening, elitists like George Soros, who predicted class war and riots over three years ago, are bankrolling what on the surface appear to be grass roots uprisings in an effort to steer and divert their impact.
This is why #BlackLivesMatter – funded to the tune of $33 million dollars by Soros – has increasingly become about toxic racial division instead of addressing the true causes of police brutality.
An uprising that could have been centered on reducing state power has instead been hijacked from below by criminal opportunists and from above by the elite itself.
Now that this uprising has been subverted, the elite will use the fallout – violent riots and looting in major cities across America – to enlist support from average Americans for an increase in state power and, in the aftermath of the next financial collapse, economic totalitarianism, government controlled bank accounts, and a move towards banning cash altogether.
It’s the age old problem-reaction-solution method at play once again. They’re getting ready to re-brand authoritarianism as a populist policy and the majority of Americans will lap it up once they see more cities burning.
As Brandon Smith explains, “The international banking cult has NO INTEREST whatsoever in saving the current system, despite the assumptions of many market analysts. Their only goal has been to stave off the visible effects of the crisis until a new system is ready (psychologically justified in the public consciousness) to be put into place.”
This new system will be characterized by more authoritarianism, a bigger police state and less economic freedom.
We know that the elite are expecting this crisis because they’ve made preparations to deal with the fallout.
The New York Times reported that the wealthy are installing expensive bulletproof safe rooms in their luxury apartments and homes to protect against increased criminality, looting, and physical threats to their safety.
Economist Robert Johnson also revealed that elitists at the Davos Economic Forum told him they were buying remote hideaways in places like New Zealand to escape potential Ferguson-style uprisings on a bigger scale.
When asked, realtors selling this property said their wealthy clients were making these purchases because they were “paranoid” about “what is happening around them.”
Urban unrest experts like Dr. Max Herman say that the United States is on the cusp of a new cycle of civil unrest. Economist Martin Armstrong predicts that “a serious political uprising will erupt by 2016″ in the United States.
I wouldn’t go that far, but it’s virtually guaranteed that we will see more widespread domestic disorder over the next two years if we continue to follow these disastrous Keynesian economic policies and allow populist social justice movements to be hijacked and subverted by the powers that be.
What’s most striking about this is that the vast majority of people simply do not care and are willing to sit idly by – distracted by the bread and circuses even as Rome collapses around them.
The elite are busy making preparations for the outcome of this next phase of the crisis….are you?
If you think this message is important, please share the video below.
https://youtu.be/6z2Sah4PlmY
 
 
Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.
This article was posted: Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 11:48 am
Posted by Earth Watch at 9:16 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Expert Predicts U.S. To Set Up Iran On Violating Nuclear Provisions

Posted by Earth Watch at 8:21 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Secrets of the Dennis Hastart indictment

Posted by Earth Watch at 8:15 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Clinton Foundation Donors got Weapons Deals, All We Got Was this Lousy T...

Posted by Earth Watch at 9:06 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Another lie from the Surveillance State Defenders - Campaign for Liberty

Another lie from the Surveillance State Defenders - Campaign for Liberty.

NATIONAL BLOG

Another lie from the Surveillance State Defenders

POSTED BY Norm Singleton May 27, 2015

Defenders of the Sec. 215 "bulk data" collection program claim that there is "not a single documented case where the program has been used to violate an individual's rights or otherwise been abused." March Wheeler, at Empty Wheel, examines this claim and finds out that there is not one documents of abuse of the Section 215 program...there are many.

Read the whole post here, with excerpts below.

Campaign for Liberty is continuing our efforts to roll-back the Surveillance State. Please support our efforts by signing your I OBJECT Citizen's Petition to Senate Leader Mitch McConnell and please contribute to our Stop the Surveillance State Round Two Money Bomb.

Statutory abuses

1) As DOJ’s IG confirmed yesterday, for most of the life of the phone dragnet (September 2006 through November 2013), the FBI flouted a mandate imposed by Congress in 2006 to adopt Section 215-specific minimization procedures that would give Americans additional protections under the provision (note–this affects all Section 215 programs, not just the phone dragnet). While, after a few years, FISC started imposing its own minimization procedures and reporting requirements (and rejected proposed minimization procedures in 2010), it nevertheless kept approving Section 215 orders.

In other words, in addition to being illegal (per the 2nd Circuit), the program also violated this part of the law for 7 years.

2) Along with all the violations of minimization procedures imposed by FISC discovered in 2009, the NSA admitted that it had been tracking roughly 3,000 presumed US persons against data collected under Section 215 without first certifying that they weren’t targeted on the basis of First Amendment protected activities, as required by the statute.

Between 24 May 2006 and 2 February 2009, NSA Homeland Mission Coordinators (HMCs) or their predecessors concluded that approximately 3,000 domestic telephone identifiers reported to Intelligence Community agencies satisfied the RAS standard and could be used as seed identifiers. However, at the time these domestic telephone identifiers were designated as RAS-approved, NSA’s OGC had not reviewed and approved their use as “seeds” as required by the Court’s Orders. NSA remedied this compliance incident by re-designating all such telephone identifiers as non RAS-approved for use as seed identifiers in early February 2009. NSA verified that although some of the 3,000 domestic identifiers generated alerts as a result of the Telephony Activity Detection Process discussed above, none of those alerts resulted in reports to Intelligence Community agencies.

NSA did not fix this problem by reviewing the basis for their targeting; instead, it simply moved these US person identifiers back onto the EO 12333 only list.

While we don’t have the background explanation, in the last year, FISC reiterated that the government must give First Amendment review before targeting people under Emergency Provisions. If so, that would reflect the second time where close FISC review led the government to admit it wasn’t doing proper First Amendment reviews, which may reflect a more systematic problem. That would not be surprising, since the government has already been chipping away at that First Amendment review via specific orders.

Minimization procedure abuses

1) The best known abuses of minimization procedures imposed by the FISC were disclosed to the FISC in 2009. The main item disclosed involved the fact that NSA had been abusing the term “archive” to create a pre-archive search against identifiers not approved for search. While NSA claimed this problem arose because no one person knew what the requirements were, in point of fact, NSA’s Inspector General warned that this alert function should be disclosed to FISC, and it was a function from the Stellar Wind program that NSA simply did not turn off when FISC set new requirements when it rubber-stamped the program.

But there were a slew of other violations of FISC-imposed minimization procedures disclosed at that time, almost all arising because NSA treated 215 data just like it treats EO 12333, in spite of FISC’s clear requirements that such data be treated with additional protections. That includes making query results available to CIA and FBI, the use of automatic search functions, and including querying on any “correlated” identifiers. These violations, in sum, are very instructive for the USA F-ReDux debate because NSA has never managed to turn these automated processes back on since, and one thing they presumably hope to gain out of moving data to the providers is to better automate the process.

2) A potentially far more egregious abuse of minimization procedures was discovered (and disclosed) in 2012, when NSA discovered that raw data NSA’s techs were using over 3,000 files of phone dragnet data on their technical server past the destruction date.

As of 16 February 2012, NSA determined that approximately 3,032 files containing call detail records potentially collected pursuant to prior BR Orders were retained on a server and been collected more than five years ago in violation of the 5-year retention period established for BR collection. Specifically, these files were retained on a server used by technical personnel working with the Business Records metadata to maintain documentation of provider feed data formats and performed background analysis to document why certain contact chaining rules were created. In addition to the BR work, this server also contains information related to the STELLARWIND program and files which do not appear to be related to either of these programs. NSA bases its determination that these files may be in violation of BR 11-191 because of the type of information contained in the files (i.e., call detail records), the access to the server by technical personnel who worked with the BR metadata, and the listed “creation date” for the files. It is possible that these files contain STELLARWIND data, despite the creation date. The STELLARWIND data could have been copied to this server, and that process could have changed the creation date to a timeframe that appears to indicate that they may contain BR metadata.

But rather than investigate this violation — rather than clarify how much data this entailed, whether it had been mingled with Stellar Wind data, whether any other violations had occurred — NSA destroyed the data.

In one incident, NSA technical personnel discovered a technical server with nearly 3,000 files containing call detail records that were more than five years old, but that had not been destroyed in accordance with the applicable retention rules. These files were among those used in connection with a migration of call detail records to a new system. Because a single file may contain more than one call detail record, and because the files were promptly destroyed by agency technical personnel, the NSA could not provide an estimate regarding the volume of calling records that were retained beyond the five-year limit. The technical server in question was not available to intelligence analysts.

From everything we’ve seen the tech and research functions are not audited, not even when they’re playing with raw data (which is, I guess, why SysAdmin Edward Snowden could walk away with so many records). So not only does this violation show that tech access to raw data falls outside of the compliance mechanisms laid out in minimization procedures (in part, with explicit permission), but that NSA doesn’t try very h

Overall sloppiness

Finally, while sloppiness on applications is not a legal violation, it does raise concerns about production under the statute. The IG Report reviewed just six case files which used Section 215 orders. Although the section is heavily redacted, there are reasons to be significantly concerned about four of those.

An application made using expedited approval that made a material misstatement about where FBI obtained a tip about the content of a phone call. The FBI agent involved “is no longer with the FBI.” The target was prosecuted for unlawful disclosure of nuke information, but the Section 215 evidence was not introduced into trial and therefore he did not have an opportunity to challenge any illegal investigative methods.

A 2009 application involving significant minimization concerns and for which FBI rolled out a “investigative value” exception for access limits on Section 215 databases. This also may involve FBI’s secret definition of US person, which I suspect pertains to treating IP addresses as non-US persons until they know it is a US person (this is akin to what they do under 702 MPs). DOJ’s minimization report to FISC included inaccuracies not fixed until June 13, 2013.

A 2009 application for a preliminary investigation that obtained medical and education records from the target’s employer. FBI ultimately determined the target “had no nexus to terrorism,” though it appears FBI kept all information on the target (meaning he will have records at FBI for 30 years). The FBI’s minimization report included an error not fixed until June 13, 2013, after the IG pointed it out.

A cyber-investigation for which the case agent could not locate the original production, which he claims was never placed in the case file.

And that’s just what can be discerned from the unredacted bits.

Remember, too: the inaccuracies (as opposed to the material misstatement) were on minimization procedures. Which suggests FBI was either deceitful — or inattentive — to how it was complying with FISC-mandated minimization procedures designed to protect innocent Americans’ privacy.
Posted by Earth Watch at 7:54 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Slaps Down Obama’s Amnesty!!! – Red Statements

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Slaps Down Obama’s Amnesty!!! – Red Statements

May 26, 2015 by Steven Ahle



The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against Obama’s amnesty plan that would give legal status to 4.7 million illegal aliens. The Obama administration had sought an expedited lifting of Judge Hanen’s injunction against the program, which the Fifth Circuit has refused to do. It appears that they have no intention of allowing Obama’s illegal amnesty program to begin before it goes to the Supreme Court for final ruling, that at this point could not happen before June of 2016.

As it stands now, Judge Hanen has yet to rule on the constitutionality of Obamnesty and it looks like the Fifth Circuit would not be inclined to overrule him. The Obama administration still can appeal the injunction and they will, but that case would be heard by the Fifth Circuit Court and would be a necessary step before they could send the case to the Supreme Court, assuming they would hear the case. Justice Roberts could refuse to hear the case with or without comment, in which case the decision of the Fifth Circuit would stand, meaning that Obamnesty would be illegal.

The Obama administration floated a compromise in which no amnesty and work permits would be issued in Texas but would be in the other 25 states involved in the suit. It took the state’s lawyers fifteen minutes to refuse the deal. It should have taken only fifteen seconds but I’m assuming that Obama’s lawyers were as incoherent as usual and it took that long to figure out what they were saying.

One federal judge in Pennsylvania has already ruled that Obama’s executive order amnesty is unconstitutional on the grounds that it gives illegal aliens benefits. While no one denies that Obama has the power over enforcement, or in this case non-enforcement, the states insist that Obama cannot bestow the rights that come with citizenship to illegal aliens.

I love it when the courts bitch slap Obama.Before Obama, the average success rate in courts for the first 44 presidents was 70%. Obama is now under 30% with a record twenty 9-0 Supreme Court decisions going against him.

Filed Under: amnesty, courtsTagged With: 5th Circuit Court, injunction, Obamnesty, upheld
Posted by Earth Watch at 7:04 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Popular Radio Host and Guest Censored by Radio Station over Vaccines

censored

By Heather Callaghan

Gary Null has been a popular, longtime radio host with the longest running health talk show which airs on Progressive Radio Network. He has authored and directed dozens upon dozens of books and documentaries.

A few weeks ago, he was asked as an honored guest on Bonnie Faulkner’s show, Guns and Butter which talks about the politics of economics and airs on Pacifica KPFA public radio stations. In the spirit of truth, Bonnie wanted listeners to hear the other side of the vaccine talk, not the “case closed” version. What you’re not being told about vaccines. And specifically SB277, the California bill to mandate vaccines for virtually all Californian school children. Who better to ask than Null, an alternative health expert, medical activist, and Pacifica veteran?

When it came time to air, however, they were told they weren’t allowed – or rather, they were outright censored and the show was cut – the first time for Guns and Butter in over 11 years. But Bonnie could not let this breach of truth rest…

Bonnie went on the Gary Null Show and they did a “reverse interview.” Bonnie then interviewed Gary and they both shared the Sound Cloud file to their listeners. Listen to the banned talk with updated information on SB277 and the censorship here, while you read what happened next…

https://soundcloud.com/guns-and-butter-1/vaccines-what-youre-not-being-told-part-one-gary-null-320

An excerpt from KPFA’s mission:

Over the years we’ve advanced the discussions and told the truth about historical moments of political impasse, racial tensions and economic inequality.

But not if it’s politically incorrect or goes against what’s popular, eh? Not very public radio-y of them…Listeners did not donate to have hard-hitting info yanked from their ears.

To make matters worse, KPFA Program Director, Laura Prives, publicly declared [bottom of page] her reasons for the cut and aired her ignorance as a result. It is clear that she must have done a lazy Google search as she is quoting directly from propagandist website Quackwatch run by anti-alternative therapy psychiatrist Stephen Barrett – always somehow #1 on Google. Or maybe she found Null’s Wikipedia entry which is only a harsh, heavily skewed rehash of…Quackwatch. Without knowing anything about Null’s work, she declares he has no credentials, has unsound theories and his work is only a vehicle to hawk products.

She says the station has a “serious responsibility to provide its listeners with accurate, science-based information on public health, most especially on issues that could potentially cause harm to people.” She says it’s not censorship but “protecting the airwaves from mis-information and from people who stand to profit by offering dubious remedies to sick and vulnerable listeners.” !!! Because pharmaceutical companies who have the media on a short leash never do that…

A sharp, lengthy response from Null includes assertions such as:

Lewis Hill [founder] would have been appalled at the blatant censorship imposed upon Bonnie Faulkner and myself, especially in light of the California senate’s recent passage of a bill that destroys Californians’ freedom of health choices for their children. Had I been allowed the opportunity to present the independent science opposing Big Pharma’s spurious claims for vaccine efficacy and safety, there might have been enough support from KPFA listeners to have delayed or thwarted the bill’s sponsors from passing it.

In the spirit of uncensored info-sharing, Guns and Butter blog also shared the following resource links:

  • Vaccines: What You Are Not Being Told – Part One
  • Gary’s response to Laura Prives, Program Director at KPFA
  • Pacifica’s KPFA Bans Gary Null Interview on Vaccines posted by James Tracy at Memory Hole Blog
  • Gary Null’s Website
  • Progressive Radio Network
  • The Forgotten History of Vaccinations You Need to Be Aware Of by Dr. Mercola
  • Has California Sold Out to Big Pharma to Lead the Nation in Medical Tyranny from Health Impact News
  • Voting Information on SB277 by Legiscan
  • Sponsors of SB277 by Legiscan
  • How are vaccines evaluated for safety? by Inside Vaccines
  • Vaccine Package Inserts by Institute by Vaccine Safety
  • Required K-12 vaccines for California

Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com and ActivistPost.com.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Activist Post of Activist Post.

Posted by Earth Watch at 11:58 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

ECONOMIST: GOVERNMENT PREPARING TO SEIZE 401(K) PENSIONS

Supreme Court ruling sets the stage for “economic totalitarianism”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
May 25, 2015

Economist Martin Armstrong warns that a Supreme Court ruling last week has set the stage for the federal government to begin seizing private pension funds.

According to Armstrong, the outcome of Tibble v. Edison, which found that employers have a duty to protect their workers’ 401(k) plans from mutual funds that perform poorly, will grease the skids for the feds to seize private funds and prosecute companies who manage mutual funds badly.

“Between the court ruling and the Obama administration’s push for stronger fiduciary rules,” the developments send a, “strong message that government can much easier seize the pension fund management industry of course to “protect the consumer,” writes Armstrong, warning that the ruling, “sets the stage to JUSTIFY government seizure of private pension funds to protect pensioners,” when the economy gets “messy”.

“This fits perfectly just in time for the Obama administration’s next assault as they prepare a landmark change of its own by issuing rules requiring that financial advisers put the interest of customers ahead of their own,” writes Armstrong. “This creates a very gray area wide enough to justify public seizure of pension funds under management.”

Following the 2008 financial collapse, reports emerged that the federal government was planning to seize the private 401(k) pensions of millions of Americans while enforcing an additional 5 per cent payroll tax as part of a new bailout program that would empower the Social Security Administration to redistribute pension funds “fairly” amongst citizens.

Armstrong warns that the development is part of a wider move towards “economic totalitarianism,” which is also characterized by efforts to eliminate physical cash altogether in the name of giving central banks more power.

Numerous prominent individuals have called for hard currency to be banned in recent months, including former Bank of England economist Jim Leaviss, who wrote a piece for the Telegraph which argued that, “Forcing everyone to spend only by electronic means from an account held at a government-run bank would give the authorities far better tools to deal with recessions and economic booms.”

Earlier this month, German Council Of Economic expert Peter Bofinger also said that imposing a cashless society would make it easier for central banks to enforce their economic policy.

As we have covered at length, commercial banks are beginning to impose more draconian controls on the withdrawal and depositing of cash, with the practice being treated as a suspicious activity even for relatively modest sums.

Armstrong, who correctly predicted the 1987 Black Monday crash as well as the 1998 Russian financial collapse, also warned last year that a coming financial collapse will cause widespread riots to erupt in America by 2016.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Posted by Earth Watch at 5:58 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Salon Collectivist Plays Race Card on Waco Shoot-out

Racist collective guilt diatribe seriously at odds with reality

Salon Collectivist Plays Race Card on Waco Shoot-out

by Infowars.com | May 23, 2015

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter44Share on Google+0Email this to someonePrint this page


The liberal online magazine Salon is attempting to spin the Waco shootout along racial lines.

Mensah Demary, a black author living in Brooklyn, injects racial bias into the news story by demanding that “White people, take responsibility for your Waco thugs.”

Demary writes:

The white privilege of individuality afforded to the biker gangs—thugs—and their murderous shootout as an isolated incident, as a singular event or, perhaps, even one of many events confined to the gangs themselves, as opposed to the larger white American population, is ingrained in the American imagination, indeed perhaps around the world.

This sort of mindless collectivism permeates liberal activist discussion in the wake of Ferguson and Baltimore.

Instead of blaming individuals for what happened in Waco, Demary believes the incident is attributable to “the actions of your people” and is, once again, a symbol of “white privilege” that is an “impenetrable shield like a cocoon.”

Demary, however, is treading on thin ice. As noted in news stories, a number of the Bandidos are in fact Hispanic. Are the people of Mexico, largely Hispanic, to be collective blamed for what the Bandidos did as well? Even more damaging for Demary’s racist argument is the fact one of the arrested was a black man.

Of course, as the Trayvon Martin case revealed, reality will not be allowed to stand in the way of the racist agenda — although George Zimmerman was obviously Hispanic, the race activists and the corporate media insisted the case was an incident of white racism against a back man (who was portrayed as a child, yet another distortion of reality).

Because Mr. Demary is a collectivist and an opportunistic racist, he believes white Americans as a group, as a collective, as a tribe must be required to uniformly “denounce the gangs. Apologize. Repent for the actions of your people.”

For the collectivist, there are no individuals and individual behavior is always attributed to a particular social class, be that class the bourgeoisie or white people. The crimes of a few, in accordance with their skin color, are to be blamed on the whole.

In past collectivist societies, in China and the Soviet Union, for example, this sort of groupthink led to almost unimaginable cruelty, murder and genocide.

If it is allowed to take hold in America, a similar result will occur.

As Alex Jones and Infowars discovered earlier this week, collectivist mobs are capable of intolerance and violence toward their perceived enemies.

Receive The Underground Insider!

Posted by Earth Watch at 4:06 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Monday, May 25, 2015

US Treasury Bonds,The Godfather Of All Bubbles

Monday, May 4, 2015

Posted by Charleston Voice

Bond Market-01

Charles E Carlson

The 30-plus-year-old bull market in US bonds, notes and bills may well be the most destructive man-made “Bubble” in all of recorded history.  It will sooner or later implode because it is unsound to the core. A puncturing of the bubble may start when any of several huge holders sells. Its implosion will trigger the sale of other overpriced corporate, municipal and foreign bonds, and the dollar itself may well be replaced as the world reserve currency. The US bond bubble is the Godfather because it is so large that no other investment market can absorb the mass exodus which will come from it. It is logical that those who have worked so deliberately to create this debt bubble will fight even harder to prevent its collapse.  When it implodes, it will probably bring down lesser bubbles and excesses, including the function of the dollar as a world exchange currency. 

A true “Bubble” must result from a successful, planned deception

The handling of US Treasury bonds, notes and bills, (“US debt” hereafter) has all the elements that make it a once-in-a-lifetime bubble. It is much more than an overvalued investment or an idea that has become an exaggerated fad, like the “Dot Com Bubble”.   We have seen many of these come and go and we have survived each one. A bubble must have the element of planned deception in order to reach proportions monstrous enough to draw in the money of a large body of public to it.  US debt floats on the unreasonable assumption of inflated value.  It deliberately and falsely promotes itself in the face of reality. Charles Mackey, a Scottish journalist, first published Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1) in 1841, a study of ancient bubbles.  HIs most famous quote is, “Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.” The slow regaining of senses is why the bubble takes so long to burst, far beyond what seems reasonable.

image: http://whtt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Madoff.Bernie-07-300x177.jpg

Madoff.Bernie-07

The eventual loss suffered by Bernie Madoff’s investors was at least $18 billion.

“Bubbles” are always recognized by some (one by one) before they finally pop.  This was the case with the scheme of Bernard Madoff, now in prison for life. Madoff started his famous Ponzi scheme, once called Ascot Partners, which, like the US debt bubble, lasted over 30 years. Several discovered it much earlier and tried to expose Madoff, but no one would listen because of the deep deception Madoff had surrounded himself with.  Madoff even held volunteer positions in regulatory agencies that should have policed him but did not.  He was also designing computer programs to backdate imaginary trades in order to achieve desired results for his customers’ accounts. He made imaginary investments in real securities, but only on paper, and instead deposited the clients’ funds in his own discretionary account at Chase Bank. [Mechanics of the Madoff Bubble – (2)]

Madoff’s reported results exceeded all investment expectations, but investors were too satisfied to worry about it being too good to be true. Hedge funds, pension plans and mutual funds all invested with Madoff. His deception was simple: his fund always moved higher and never had a bad year!  This was a sure sign something was wrong, and one by one a few tried to expose him. 

The eventual loss suffered by Madoff’s investors was at least $18 billion, although those who got out early reaped gains at the expense of those who stayed in to the end!  Madoff admitted during his March 2009 guilty plea that the essence of his scheme was to deposit client money into a Chase account, rather than invest it.  When clients wanted their money, “I used the money in the Chase Manhattan bank account that belonged to them or other clients to pay the requested funds,” he told the court.

A True Bubble requires mass public participation

On April 19, 2015, Bloomberg News reported that public investors, seeking safety, “may sink $350 billion into debt funds globally this year, adding to the $3 trillion they’ve already poured into bonds since 2008.” (3-A) This influx is mostly through banks, mutual finds and managed IRAs. Per a 2015 article, “In U.S.debt auctions this year, bond mutual funds have bought a record 43 percent of newly issued Treasuries, allotment data compiled by Bloomberg show.” (3-A)

A bubble-creating deception may be an illegal one, like Madoff’s, or it may be a legitimized deception, such as the Federal Reserve System (FED), enacted by Congress 102 years ago. 

The measure of a bubble is not legality, but successful deception.  

The modern mutual fund business has learned how to prosper on US debt investments, considered in a previous era to be a dull and prosaic investment.  Mutual funds have added excitement to it by an implied promise of perpetual capital gains on top of meager income.  No word of capital loss potential is every mentioned.  We will detail one such example by fund manager, J P Morgan Chase Bank in this paper.

Bloomberg News further points out (3-A), “There are plenty of reasons to be bearish on U.S. government bonds. They pay almost nothing, the Federal Reserve wants to raise interest rates and money managers are largely convinced they’re [bonds] too expensive …[A] record 84 percent of professional investors in a Bank of America Corp. survey released this month said bonds were overvalued.” (3-B)

This writer agrees.  Treasury bonds are near the end of a 30 plus year bull market, a “Bubble” based on an unrealistic and  manipulated assumption that US Treasury bonds do or can be made to always sell higher and higher in the market place, translating into ever lower interest payments.  The Treasury keeps its hands clean by looking to the FED to manage the deception that keeps a line of willing lenders ready to loan money to the Treasury at higher and higher prices, (lower interest rates).

Three Deceptions that fire the US Debt Bubble

The Federal Reserve Bank of NY has its own style of deception, which varies slightly from Madoff’s and is about 1000 times larger.  It is the super-bank franchise dealer for US debt and claims to be the largest single holder of US debt.  But, unlike other buyers, the FED is allowed to purchase without investing capital, which explains why it is the biggest lender. The US debt bubble has been produced by three contrived deceptions.

First, dollars are electronically printed on the books of the FED whenever the Treasury sells US debt directly to the Federal Reserve Bank for its own account. The Treasury then spends these dollars by writing checks on its bank account at the FED.  The deception is that the FED does not put up anything of value to acquire this new US debt, rather it uses electronically created dollars that recently have been conceded to be, and are referred to as “printed” dollars.  Thus the illusion is created whenever needed, that demand is outstripping supply, and that there is a constant shortage of US bonds and notes.  Chase Manhattan Bank and Morgan Guarantee Bank were original major stockholders of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank (4), before they merged into the present J P Morgan Chase Bank.  Its money management division helps keep the US debt market creeping upward, as will be discussed later.

Second, after issuance, the market price for the newly issued US debt is manipulated, always upwardly, by the Open Market Committee of the FED.  It accomplishes this by making additional purchases in the open market, again with electronically printed dollars. The impact of all this new money on the US debt market produces smooth, little-controlled rises in the US debt’s market value year after year. Because the interest rate paid on US debt and each instrument’s market price are inversely related, Treasury bond interest is currently at a record low, meaning the market price of the debt is at a near all-time record high. This happens in spite of the clear fact that new debt is constantly being sold into the market, which should make the market go down, not up. As with Bernie Madoff’s hedge fund, the illusion is created that the market for US debt can go only one way: UP. Gradually this bubble becomes accepted as reality!  The madness of Charles Mackey’s crowd is achieved. During the course of this manipulation, according to its own report, the FED has accumulated $2.4 trillion in US debt, for which it paid nothing at all.

Third, value in US debt comes from “professional” managers of other people’s money (OPMM), who sell the specious notion that the open market value of US debt always rises enough to make up for the minuscule interest rate bonds and notes pay to the investor. OPMM keep on buying and trading US debt and are the largest holders by far! We must examine how this is accomplished in a real world of declining purchasing power for these bonds.  We will use as our example, the J P Morgan Chase Bank, whose two predecessor banks were original owners of the FED (4), and probably still are.  [Because the FED is unaudited, its present ownership is unknown to this author.]

As in the Madoff Ponzi bubble, manipulating parties, including the self-serving Congress, have contrived an UP, UP, and ever higher market for US debt that is hanging the least suspecting citizens out to dry. Consider that the Social Security Trust Fund is invested almost entirely in US debt and that, with similar US agency funds, such as the military pension plan, they hold about 1/3 of all federal debt issued.  What would happen to Social Security checks and health care payments if, say, 25% of their assets evaporated in just a few months?

The military-banking complex continues to provide the need for vast sales of US debt with its serial wars in the Middle East, which started in 1991.  US debt expansion also destroys the underpinnings of the US Dollar as the world reserve currency because there is no limit as to how much dollar currency there will be in circulation.  This practice of making war, then printing or borrowing the money to pay for it, is surprisingly similar to the British course of action that broke the back of its economy by 1914 and which forced it off the gold standard for good, and in 1931, the world turned away from the Pound Sterling  as a world reserve currency and opted instead for the Dollar.

The British Empire destroyed itself by borrowing for foreign wars it never lost

England set the standard for brutality in war in the 1895-1910 era when it invaded and destroyed two far away and very different lands. They moved into Sudan in 1898, followed closely by their invasion of South Africa in 1902. Both campaigns were covered by youthful reporter/adventurer Winston Churchill.

The war to conquer Sudan was unpopular in England, but the British War Department overcame public objections by fashioning a publicity campaign for revenge on Mahdi Muhammad Ahman  because a year earlier he had led an independence movement that captured the garrison at Khartoum and killed a popular British war hero, Charles Gordon. The war faction in Britain managed to sub-humanize the black Muslim Sudanese. 

English gentlemen have long been conditioned to accept the necessity for killing “wogs” going beck to Rudyard Kipling’s India.  

In the slaughter at Khartoum, it was British modern military supremacy against a primitively armed Sudanese independence movement. Propaganda-wise, the Sudanese had two ethnic strikes against them: they were both black and Muslim. The British Empire’s bloody success at Omdurman was recorded in a classic book by British author Alan Moorhead, The Blue Nile (1962).

England’s next war adventure was the invasion of South Africa in 1902, which in England turned out to be a very unpopular and expensive war. The Boer War was fought for control of South African gold mines.  It became the straw that broke the Empire.  

The Boers were white Europeans, and their casualties included some 40,000 Dutch wives and children of the Boer farmer-soldiers.  Under command of Herbert Kitchener first Earl, the wives and kids were gathered into British concentration camps and starved to death, to force the Boer farmers to yield to a treaty.  It worked.  Back home The British heard about this and could not stomach the facts. The detailed and painful account of this last British war for assets is told by Englishman Thomas Pakengham, in his classic, The Boer War (1979).

READ MORE

View article...

Related Posts

  • The Whole Story Of Zionist Conspiracy & How the US was Recruited as a pro-Zionist Ally by England - *video*
  • Israelis Killed more Palestinians Last Year than in any Year since 1967
  • Espionage, Treason, and the Congressional Fifth Column
  • The Communist Plan to Conquer America to be by Inciting Anarchy via Black Racism & Anti-Gentilism
  • Business Chiefs that Abhor Private Property

 

 

Read more at http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2015/05/us-treasury-bondsthe-godfather-of-all.html#t0zw2e1jIMMOc5WA.99

Posted by Earth Watch at 4:25 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

They brought wolves to Yellowstone, but they had no idea this would be the result.


Posted by Earth Watch at 4:06 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Sunday, May 24, 2015

Mothers are losing the ability to give birth naturally and breastfeed their babies claims leading doctor who blames rise of C-sections and use of drugs

 

  • Mothers have become too reliant on the drugs used in labour, said doctor
  • Dr Michel Odent claimed that this puts women's ability to give birth at risk
  • Fewer women are able to produce the hormone oxytocin, doctor added
  • This threatens ability to breastfeed and to give birth naturally, he said 

By Jennifer Smith for MailOnline

Published: 02:42 EST, 24 May 2015 | Updated: 11:56 EST, 24 May 2015

Dr Michel Odent said women's ability to give birth naturally is under threat 

Dr Michel Odent said women's ability to give birth naturally is under threat 

Mothers are losing the ability to give birth naturally and breastfeed because their bodies have become too reliant on drugs used during labour, a leading doctor has claimed.

Dr Michel Odent believes women are at risk of losing the hormones needed to deliver children because they have been supplied by doctors via drips for so long. 

The Frenchman, who championed the use of birth pools in hospitals, added that a lack of naturally produced hormones will also hinder breastfeeding.

Women are already enduring longer labours, with mothers giving birth between 2002 and 2008 taking on average two-and-a-half hours longer than those in the late 1950s.

In his new book Do We Need Midwives?, Dr Rodent said the research 'demonstrates that women are losing the ability to give birth.'

'That is the primary phenomenon... the number of women who give birth naturally is becoming insignificant,' he is reported as saying by The Sunday Times.

One of the major contributors to the decline is medical supply of the hormone oxytocin, he said.

The hormone is needed to go into labour and is also necessary when breastfeeding, with some in the past claiming it is the component which makes a mother fall in love with her child and bond with them from birth. 

But with an increasing number of women depending on drips and Caesarean sections, Dr Odent said women's ability to produce the hormone by themselves is under threat. 

'The human oxytocin system - the oxytocin, being the hormone of love, fundamental to birth and bonding, even in adulthood - is growing weaker. 

RELATED ARTICLES

  • Pictured is Lisa Bailey with her young son Kayden-Jay. See SWNS story SWBREAST; A furious mum is threatening to pull her kids from a primary school after she claims she was shamed by the head teacher ñ for BREASTFEEDING.  Angry mum-of-four Lisa Bailey wants to stand up for other parents and shame the school for denying her the right to feed her tot.  Lisa was at Langney Primary School to wave her 11-year-old daughter Abbie off on a week-long school trip when her son Kayden-Jay, one, became irritable and hungry.  She went to the back of the assembly hall of the Eastbourne, East Sussex, to ìdiscreetlyî feed her baby, just before school started on Monday morning.  But moments later, the school head Julie Prentice came over and told her to move on, in case any of the students became uncomfortable.  Stay at home mum Lisa, 32, of Eastbourne, said: ìThe head teacher kept looking over at me. She came and sat next to me and she said ëCan I move you to my officeí.  She was quite abrupt about itBreastfeeding mother's fury after headteacher 'asked her not...Mothers who have a C-section CAN give birth naturally the...

'The future of the human capacity to give birth is at risk,' Dr Odent added.

In the past he has come under fire to criticising the number of women who undergo Caesarean sections.

In 2006 Dr Odent controversially said the procedure stood in the way of mothers bonding with their babies in the same way as those who gave birth naturally. 

'What we can say for sure is that when a woman gives birth with a pre-labour Caesarean section she does not release this flow of love hormones, so she is a different woman than if she had given birth naturally and the first contact between mother and baby is different.' 

The doctor said vital hormones needed during childbirth and breastfeeding are becoming more difficult for women to produce naturally (file image)

The doctor said vital hormones needed during childbirth and breastfeeding are becoming more difficult for women to produce naturally (file image)

Other leading midwives and doctors have in the past said the rate of women undergoing the procedure is too high. 

In response NHS collected data in 2008, the Royal College of Midwives said the number was 'worryingly high.

'Women should be aware that a caesarean section is a major surgical procedure,' said general secretary designate, Cathy Warwick. 

'There is clear evidence that some caesarean sections are unnecessary and put women and babies at risk. 

'Coupled with this the birthrate is rising sharply, and midwife numbers are failing to keep pace, leaving them little time antenatally to discuss the birth and the available options with women.'  

What is involved in a caesarean section? Hear from the experts

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3094813/Mothers-losing-ability-birth-naturally-breastfeed-babies-claims-doctor-blames-rise-C-sections-use-drugs.html#ixzz3b6YSepB2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Posted by Earth Watch at 5:20 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Cops Who Flash Banged Infant’s Crib Blame the Baby

Truth Frequency Radio
May 22, 2015

2.bp.blogspot.com_2015-05-22_11-25-44By Joshua Krause

Nearly a year has passed since a Habersham County SWAT team stormed into the Phonesavanh residence, and very nearly killed their 19–month-old child. The no-knock raid was prompted by an anonymous tip which suggested there were drugs in the house. As the officers forced their way into the home, they lobbed a flash grenade which wound up landing in the crib where baby “bou-bou” was sleeping. As it erupted, the infant suffered severe burns and had to be taken to the hospital, and placed in a medically induced coma.

To any sane person, the sheriff’s department would be responsible for the damage inflicted on this child. Not only were there no drugs in the house, but the suspect they were looking for was found elsewhere. And despite their claims that they had the house under surveillance for two days prior to the raid, somehow they had no idea that there were children who lived there.

Still, the family had to fight the county tooth and nail to have their $1 million in medical bills reimbursed. Last month they settled with the county, and received $964,000, half of which will be given to them now, and the rest will be given to baby after he turns 18. While it’s great to hear that the family is getting something out of this, it’s shocking to see how defiant the sheriff’s department was, right to the very end. They never once admitted culpability for their gross negligence, and in a bizarre twist, their defense statement in court basically blamed the infant for his own injuries.

William Norman Grigg from the Pro Libertate blog read through the lengthy document, and sifted through the legalese for our benefit. It’s almost unbelievable how far the sheriff’s department was willing to go to avoid paying the family whose child they burned alive.

The act of sleeping in a room about to be breached by a SWAT team constituted “criminal” conduct on the part of the infant. At the very least, the infant was fully liable for the nearly fatal injuries inflicted on him when Habersham County Sheriff’s Deputy Charles Long blindly heaved a flash-bang grenade – a “destructive device,” as described by the ATF, that when detonated burns at 2,000-3,500 degrees Fahrenheit – into the crib.

Merely by being in that room, Bou-Bou had assumed the risk of coming under attack by a SWAT team. By impeding the trajectory of that grenade, rather than fleeing from his crib, Bou-Bou failed to “avoid the consequences” of that attack.

In any case, Bou-Bou, along with his parents and his siblings, are fully and exclusively to blame for the injuries that nearly killed the child and left the family with more than one million dollars in medical bills. The SWAT team that invaded the home in Cornelia, Georgia on the basis of a bogus anonymous tip that a $50 drug transaction had occurred there is legally blameless.

This is the defense presented by Haberham County Sheriff Joey Terrell and his comrades in their reply to a federal lawsuit filed last February on behalf of Bou-Bou Phonesavanh and his family.

Can you believe that? It gets much worse from here. When photographic evidence of the baby’s horrific injuries were shown in court, the defendants denied that the photograph “accurately depicts the injuries allegedly sustained.” The statement goes on to the blame the parents and the baby because the damages caused to the child were “directly and proximately caused by the contributory and comparative negligence of the plaintiffs and their failure to exercise ordinary care.”

And as a last-ditch effort to avoid paying the bill, the sheriff’s department invoked the principle of “laches,” which in the legal world, is a kind of use it or lose it statement. It basically means that you don’t have the right to sue, if you waited a long period of time in the hopes that future circumstances would favor your case. It doesn’t apply in this case at all because the family almost immediately filed a notice with the court after the incident.

The origins and usage of that obscure and archaic legal term do offer some insight about the way Bou-Bou’s would-be murderers see themselves, and their victim.

“Laches” is a term embodying the ancient legal maxim that “Equity favors the vigilant, and not those who have slumbered on their rights.” Defendants who appeal to this oft-cited and little-applied concept are accusing plaintiffs of subjecting them to a form of “legal ambush.”

What Sheriff Joey and his cornpone chekists are claiming, in effect, is that while he was sleeping, Baby Bou-Bou ambushed them.

How low can one police department go?

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

http://truthfrequencyradio.com/cops-who-flash-banged-infants-crib-blame-the-baby/

Posted by Earth Watch at 12:59 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Special Report: TPP Gives Obama Power To Destroy America

The TPP is global domination by a fascist cartel bent on enslaving the world

Prison Planet.com
May 23, 2015

In this exclusive emergency address, Alex breaks down the hidden reasons behind the sinister Trans Pacific Trade Partnership.

The TPP is global domination by a fascist cartel bent on enslaving the world. Now the Senate has given fast-track authority to Obama to implement this secret plan and set fire to our Constitution, rules of law and ultimately our liberty and way of life.

Kentucky Senator and presidential candidate Rand Paul was among a host of lawmakers who staunchly opposed the secrecy surrounding the Trans Pacific Partnership bill, saying he disagrees with the proposed legislation “being held under lock and key.”

“I’m hesitant to give blanket authority on stuff we haven’t seen,” Senator Paul said earlier this month.

Yesterday, Paul was one of only five republican senators that voted against the final “fast-track” bill, in a vote that passed 62-37.

“Fast-track would allow Obama to send the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal to Congress for an up-or-down vote” sans the ability to negotiate amendments, notes The Hill.

The TPA must still pass a House vote, which is why it’s imperative to contact your representatives and let them know you’re against H.R. 1314, the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) or fast-track bill, which essentially grants the office of the president the power to do treaty by Executive Order.

This article was posted: Saturday, May 23, 2015 at 1:14 pm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/special-report-tpp-gives-obama-power-to-destroy-america.html

Posted by Earth Watch at 4:04 PM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Federal Court Rules Pro-Life Views are ‘Patently Offensive’

Daily Caller News Foundation

Federal Court Rules Pro-Life Views Are ‘Patently Offensive’

Photo of Blake Neff

Blake Neff Reporter

10:17 PM 05/22/2015

Federal Court Rules Pro-Life Views are 'Patently Offensive'

A new decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals holds that New York’s state government has the right to ban “Choose Life” license plates on the grounds that such a statement is “patently offensive.”

The dispute stems from a now-suspended program offered by New York’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) which allowed private organizations to create custom license plates. If drivers purchased the plates, the purchasing price was split between the DMV and the non-profit.

The Children First Foundation (CFF), an organization promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, submitted a design for a “Choose Life” license plate, which featured a drawing of two children’s faces in front of a yellow sun.

The proposed plate was rejected, with the DMV citing a policy that allows it to ban “patently offensive” plates in order to prevent incidents of road rage. The “patently offensive” category in U.S. speech is typically related to public obscenity laws, and allows for limitations on things like the public display of pornography or other materials that blatantly violate community standards.

Later, during the lawsuit, the DMV claimed it was simply carrying out a general ban on plates concerning politically divisive topics, since government-issued license plates could be perceived as government-sponsored speech. However, in the past the DMV has approved pro-union and pro-environmental plates.

Judge Rosemary Pooler, a Clinton appointee, agreed with New York’s position in her majority opinion. She took this view even though she also ruled that license plates are private speech subject to First Amendment protections. Despite these protections, however, she said that so many New Yorkers could find a plate advocating an anti-abortion position “patently offensive” that the DMV was justified in suppressing the speech.

Pooler also said that simple alternatives existed for drivers who wished to express opposition to abortion.

“[Drivers] may display a ‘Choose Life’ bumper sticker — or even cover every available square inch of their vehicle with such stickers,” Pooler wrote. “That message will resonate just as loudly as if vehicle displayed a ‘Choose Life’ license plate. It will merely do so without the perception of State endorsement.”

The decision overturned the ruling of a lower court from 2011, which held that blocking the plates was an illegal First Amendment violation.

In a strong dissent, Judge Debra Ann Livingston said the court was essentially granting the New York DMV the right to suppress any viewpoints it did not like.

The case has been worming its way through the courts for an exceptionally long time. The original Choose Life plate was rejected in 2002, and CFF’s lawsuit was filed in 2004. Even Friday’s ruling was in response to oral arguments that were first made in 2012. Friday’s ruling may not be the last, either. The Alliance Defending Freedom, a public interest law firm representing CFF, has said it is reviewing its legal options in the wake of the ruling,

Follow Blake on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/federal-court-rules-pro-life-views-are-patently-offensive/

Posted by Earth Watch at 11:34 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

How Monsanto Stops GMO Labeling Through Deception

Pro-GMO groups backed by Monsanto are already playing dirty

How Monsanto Stops GMO Labeling Through Deception

From the New York Times to Reuters and the Washington Post, all of the major publications agree: the general public is in full support of GMO labeling initiatives.

Quite simply, they want to know what they’re giving to both themselves and their family. Time and time again, we see poll results demonstrating that more than 90% of the US population is in favor of  GMO labeling. Yet time and time again, we see GMO labeling initiatives shot down across the country.

Are all of the major polling organizations in the country simply using incorrect statistical algorithms? Obviously, the answer instead lies in the dirty tricks (and even the mainstream media is now calling them out as such) used by mega biotech companies like Monsanto. In tandem with corporate food producers, these tricks are used to shove disinformation into the minds of voters who otherwise would fully support the concept of GMO labeling.

Specifically, we’re talking about pro-GMO lobby groups faking quotes from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that ‘support GMOs’ in the face of labeling initiatives, and even groups falsely claiming that Stanford is on the side of Monsanto amid the labeling debate (when they aren’t and haven’t even commented on the issue).

But before we get into these dirty geurilla tactics and their use in the informational war over GMOs, let’s really look at the truly overwhelming support for GMO labeling in this country based upon the estimates of major polling groups.

The New York Times: 93% found to be in support of labeling GMOs

MSNBC: 96% in support

Reuters/NPR: 93% in support of full labeling

Washington Post: 95% in support of full labeling

Consumer Reports: 95% agree GM animals should be labeled

ABC News: 93% want federal GM labeling mandate

So with these stats being reported virtually unanimously, what could Monsanto possibly be doing to sway voters outside of blatantly manipulating the actual polling results? As it turns out, and as we wrote about back in 2012, Monsanto has actually been caught not only misusing an FDA logo — but blatantly fabricating an FDA quote in order to suppress California’s notorious Prop 37 GMO labeling bill. From the report back in November of 2012:

fda-monsanto-prop-37

“Misuse of a United States government seal can lead to a $250,000 fine, twenty years in prison, and three years of supervised release — unless you’re a campaign organization funded by major corporations like Monsanto. In a move completely ignored by the mainstream media (many of which have financial ties to such corporations), the anti-GMO labeling No on 37 Committee paid for and disseminated a physical piece of direct mail that not only entirely misused the FDA logo but even sported a fabricated quote.

A quote that even the FDA has stated on record that was never stated. That is because it would actually be illegal to do so. You see federal agencies cannot take a stance on Proposition 37, which means that the Monsanto-funded No on 37 campaign literally created the quote and FDA support out of thin air. In other words, the organization leaders blatantly violated 8 U.S.C. §§ 506 and 1017 by misusing the FDA seal and writing a quote out of thin air to support their political campaign to keep Monsanto rolling in the billions.”

And that’s only a portion of what was needed to crush California’s highly anticipated GMO labeling bill. As Huffington Post points out, much more was also discovered:

“They used the Stanford logo in TV ads and mailers, when the University also did not take a stand on the issue. And they said that Henry I. Miller, their hired gun, is a professor at Stanford when in reality, he works for the Hoover Institution — which rents office space on the campus.

They paid a PR firm with expertise in fighting recycling legislation (on behalf of the soda pop industry) to generate a misleading “study” that was designed to show the proposition raising food prices by hundreds of dollars per state resident per year.

They said there have never been any documented ill-effects from GMO consumption. But many allege that 37 direct human deaths and 1,500 disabilities linked to a toxic batch of the supplement Tryptophan were caused by a genetically engineered strain of bacteria used in production. And there are numerous reports oflivestock that have died as a result of grazing on GMO cotton.”

Outside of deeply manipulating vote counts, pro-GMO groups backed by Monsanto are already playing dirty and spreading what amounts to complete misinformation into the public spotlight. And they’re doing it with millions in funding. Checkout the details of who exactly is pumping cash into efforts to defeat your ability to know what you’re eating:

Monsanto – $7,100,500
DuPont – $4,900,000
Pepsi – $2,145,400
Bayer – $2,000,000
Dow – $2,000,000
BASF – $2,000,000
Syngenta – $2,000,000
Kraft Foods – $1,950,000
Coca-Cola – $1,455,500
Nestle – $1,315,600
General Mills – $1,135,000
ConAgra – $1,077,000
Kellogg’s – $790,000
Smithfield – $684,000

And here’s a list of companies that have supported Prop 37:

Mercola.com – $1,115,000
Nature’s Path – $610,000
Dr. Bronner’s – $369,000
Lundberg – $251,000
Udis/EarthBalance/Glutino – $102,000
Clif Bar- $100,000
Organic Valley – $100,000
Amy’s – $100,000
Annie’s – $50,000
Nutiva – $50,000
Frey Vineyards – $35,000

Anthony Gucciardi is a natural health & self-development speaker, writer, and author. His writings have appeared in #1 selling books and top 100 websites.

Posted by Earth Watch at 11:13 AM
Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )

TiLTNews Archive

Search This Blog

Bannons War Room

Loading...

Warroom Live Transcripts

Make America Great Again

Make America Great Again

Blog Archive

The Whitehouse Live

https://www.whitehouse.gov/live/

News – The White House

Loading...

Presidential Actions – The White House

Loading...

President Trump Gives a Presidential Address to the Nation August 21, 2017

Today America Turned An Irreversible Corner

BREAKING: President Donald Trump Delivers an URGENT Message of Unity and Equality 1/15/18

Alex Jones Show

Total Pageviews

Theme images by enot-poloskun. Powered by Blogger.